根据国际协议验证四种自动测量血压的设备:Pic室内个人检查,舒适检查,我的检查和旅行检查。

Blood pressure. Supplement Pub Date : 2009-10-01
Giuseppe Germano, Angelos Psimenos, Francesco Sarullo, Alessandro Venditti, Valerio Pecchioli, Roland Asmar
{"title":"根据国际协议验证四种自动测量血压的设备:Pic室内个人检查,舒适检查,我的检查和旅行检查。","authors":"Giuseppe Germano,&nbsp;Angelos Psimenos,&nbsp;Francesco Sarullo,&nbsp;Alessandro Venditti,&nbsp;Valerio Pecchioli,&nbsp;Roland Asmar","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Four oscillometric devices for self-measurement of blood pressure (SBPM) were evaluated according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) in four separate studies. The Pic Indolor Personal Check, Comfort Check and My Check measure blood pressure (BP) at the brachial level; the Travel Check measures radial BP at the wrist level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The International Protocol includes a total number of 33 subjects. In each study and for each subject, four BP measurements were performed simultaneously by two observers using mercury sphygmomanometers alternately with three measurements by the tested device. The difference between the observers and the device BP values (99 pairs) were classified into three categories (< or =5, < or =10, < or =15 mmHg).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All four tested devices passed the validation process. The mean differences between the device and mercury readings were 0.1 +/- 2.9 and -0.1 +/- 3.8 mmHg for systolic and diastolic BP respectively for the Personal Check; -1.0 +/- 3.7 and 0.2 +/- 3.2 mmHg for the Comfort Check; -0.6 +/- 4.5 and -1.5 +/- 4.3 mmHg for the My Check; -0.1 +/- 2.0 and 0.6 +/- 1.7 mmHg for the Travel Check.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Readings of the Pic Indolor Personal Check, Comfort Check, My Check and Travel Check devices differing by less than 5, 10 and 15 mmHg fulfill the International Protocol requirements and therefore can be used by patients for SBPM.</p>","PeriodicalId":8974,"journal":{"name":"Blood pressure. Supplement","volume":"1 ","pages":"15-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of four automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol: the Pic Indolor Personal Check, Comfort Check, My Check and Travel Check.\",\"authors\":\"Giuseppe Germano,&nbsp;Angelos Psimenos,&nbsp;Francesco Sarullo,&nbsp;Alessandro Venditti,&nbsp;Valerio Pecchioli,&nbsp;Roland Asmar\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Four oscillometric devices for self-measurement of blood pressure (SBPM) were evaluated according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) in four separate studies. The Pic Indolor Personal Check, Comfort Check and My Check measure blood pressure (BP) at the brachial level; the Travel Check measures radial BP at the wrist level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The International Protocol includes a total number of 33 subjects. In each study and for each subject, four BP measurements were performed simultaneously by two observers using mercury sphygmomanometers alternately with three measurements by the tested device. The difference between the observers and the device BP values (99 pairs) were classified into three categories (< or =5, < or =10, < or =15 mmHg).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All four tested devices passed the validation process. The mean differences between the device and mercury readings were 0.1 +/- 2.9 and -0.1 +/- 3.8 mmHg for systolic and diastolic BP respectively for the Personal Check; -1.0 +/- 3.7 and 0.2 +/- 3.2 mmHg for the Comfort Check; -0.6 +/- 4.5 and -1.5 +/- 4.3 mmHg for the My Check; -0.1 +/- 2.0 and 0.6 +/- 1.7 mmHg for the Travel Check.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Readings of the Pic Indolor Personal Check, Comfort Check, My Check and Travel Check devices differing by less than 5, 10 and 15 mmHg fulfill the International Protocol requirements and therefore can be used by patients for SBPM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood pressure. Supplement\",\"volume\":\"1 \",\"pages\":\"15-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood pressure. Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood pressure. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:根据欧洲高血压学会(ESH)的国际协议,在四个独立的研究中评估四种自我测量血压的振荡装置(sppm)。Pic室内Personal Check、Comfort Check和My Check测量肱动脉水平的血压;旅行检查测量手腕水平的径向血压。方法:国际议定书共纳入33名受试者。在每项研究中,对每名受试者,由两名观测者同时使用水银血压计进行四次血压测量,并由被测设备交替进行三次测量。观察者与设备BP值(99对)的差异分为三类(< or =5, < or =10, < or =15 mmHg)。结果:四种测试设备均通过了验证过程。个人检查的收缩压和舒张压的平均差异分别为0.1 +/- 2.9和-0.1 +/- 3.8 mmHg;-1.0 +/- 3.7和0.2 +/- 3.2 mmHg的舒适度检查;-0.6 +/- 4.5和-1.5 +/- 4.3 mmHg;-0.1 +/- 2.0和0.6 +/- 1.7 mmHg的旅行检查。结论:Pic室内个人检查、舒适检查、我的检查和旅行检查设备的读数相差小于5、10和15毫米汞柱符合国际议定书的要求,因此可以用于spbpm患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of four automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol: the Pic Indolor Personal Check, Comfort Check, My Check and Travel Check.

Objective: Four oscillometric devices for self-measurement of blood pressure (SBPM) were evaluated according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) in four separate studies. The Pic Indolor Personal Check, Comfort Check and My Check measure blood pressure (BP) at the brachial level; the Travel Check measures radial BP at the wrist level.

Methods: The International Protocol includes a total number of 33 subjects. In each study and for each subject, four BP measurements were performed simultaneously by two observers using mercury sphygmomanometers alternately with three measurements by the tested device. The difference between the observers and the device BP values (99 pairs) were classified into three categories (< or =5, < or =10, < or =15 mmHg).

Results: All four tested devices passed the validation process. The mean differences between the device and mercury readings were 0.1 +/- 2.9 and -0.1 +/- 3.8 mmHg for systolic and diastolic BP respectively for the Personal Check; -1.0 +/- 3.7 and 0.2 +/- 3.2 mmHg for the Comfort Check; -0.6 +/- 4.5 and -1.5 +/- 4.3 mmHg for the My Check; -0.1 +/- 2.0 and 0.6 +/- 1.7 mmHg for the Travel Check.

Conclusion: Readings of the Pic Indolor Personal Check, Comfort Check, My Check and Travel Check devices differing by less than 5, 10 and 15 mmHg fulfill the International Protocol requirements and therefore can be used by patients for SBPM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Post-registration studies for the evaluation of antihypertensive drugs. Effect of fixed dose combinations of metoprolol and amlodipine in essential hypertension: MARS--a randomized controlled trial. Efficacy and safety of valsartan in hypertensive Taiwanese patients: post-marketing surveillance study. Efficacy and safety of early versus late titration of fixed-dose irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide: ACTUAL study. Clevidipine for severe hypertension in patients with renal dysfunction: a VELOCITY trial analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1