{"title":"缬沙坦对台湾高血压患者的疗效和安全性:上市后监测研究。","authors":"Chia-Wei Liou, Tung-Chen Yeh, I-Chung Chen, Chi-Hung Huang, Yi-Jen Hung, Kwan-Lih Hsu, Jian-Der Lee, Meng-Huan Lei, Kuan-Cheng Chang, Pei-Yung Liao, Zhih-Cherng Chen, Jackson Wang, Charles Jia-yin Hou","doi":"10.3109/08037051.2011.588458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of valsartan in Taiwanese patients with essential hypertension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This 12-week multi-center, open-label, observational, post-marketing surveillance study enrolled 2046 hypertensive patients who were prescribed valsartan 80 or 160 mg as monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensives based on clinical judgment. The primary endpoint was the incidence rate of dizziness with valsartan 160 mg monotherapy or combination therapy at Week 4. Secondary endpoints included the blood-pressure-lowering efficacy and the overall safety and tolerability of valsartan at Weeks 4 and 12.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The monotherapy and combination groups had comparable baseline characteristics. At Week 4, monotherapy was found non-inferior to combination for incidence rate of dizziness (monotherapy, 9.25%; combination, 10%; difference in incidence of dizziness, 0.75%; 95% CI - 0.61% to 2.12%; non-inferiority margin, -1.33%;WaldTest approach). Greater blood pressure (BP) reduction was noted atWeek 12 than atWeek 4.The antihypertensive effect was greater with combination therapy and the 160-mg dose. BP control (systolic <140 mmHg or diastolic <90 mmHg) was achieved in 80-90% patients.Valsartan was well tolerated; most commonly reported adverse events included dizziness, headache, constipation and cough.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Valsartan is an effective treatment option for essential hypertension in Taiwanese patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8974,"journal":{"name":"Blood pressure. Supplement","volume":"2 ","pages":"13-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/08037051.2011.588458","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of valsartan in hypertensive Taiwanese patients: post-marketing surveillance study.\",\"authors\":\"Chia-Wei Liou, Tung-Chen Yeh, I-Chung Chen, Chi-Hung Huang, Yi-Jen Hung, Kwan-Lih Hsu, Jian-Der Lee, Meng-Huan Lei, Kuan-Cheng Chang, Pei-Yung Liao, Zhih-Cherng Chen, Jackson Wang, Charles Jia-yin Hou\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/08037051.2011.588458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of valsartan in Taiwanese patients with essential hypertension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This 12-week multi-center, open-label, observational, post-marketing surveillance study enrolled 2046 hypertensive patients who were prescribed valsartan 80 or 160 mg as monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensives based on clinical judgment. The primary endpoint was the incidence rate of dizziness with valsartan 160 mg monotherapy or combination therapy at Week 4. Secondary endpoints included the blood-pressure-lowering efficacy and the overall safety and tolerability of valsartan at Weeks 4 and 12.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The monotherapy and combination groups had comparable baseline characteristics. At Week 4, monotherapy was found non-inferior to combination for incidence rate of dizziness (monotherapy, 9.25%; combination, 10%; difference in incidence of dizziness, 0.75%; 95% CI - 0.61% to 2.12%; non-inferiority margin, -1.33%;WaldTest approach). Greater blood pressure (BP) reduction was noted atWeek 12 than atWeek 4.The antihypertensive effect was greater with combination therapy and the 160-mg dose. BP control (systolic <140 mmHg or diastolic <90 mmHg) was achieved in 80-90% patients.Valsartan was well tolerated; most commonly reported adverse events included dizziness, headache, constipation and cough.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Valsartan is an effective treatment option for essential hypertension in Taiwanese patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood pressure. Supplement\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"13-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/08037051.2011.588458\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood pressure. Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/08037051.2011.588458\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood pressure. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/08037051.2011.588458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
目的:评价缬沙坦治疗台湾原发性高血压的疗效和安全性。方法:这项为期12周的多中心、开放标签、观察性、上市后监测研究纳入了2046例高血压患者,这些患者根据临床判断服用缬沙坦80或160 mg作为单药治疗或与其他抗高血压药物联合治疗。主要终点是第4周缬沙坦160 mg单药或联合治疗的头晕发生率。次要终点包括在第4周和第12周缬沙坦的降压效果、总体安全性和耐受性。结果:单药治疗组和联合治疗组具有相似的基线特征。在第4周,发现单药治疗的头晕发生率不低于联合治疗(单药治疗,9.25%;组合,10%;头晕发生率差异为0.75%;95% CI - 0.61% - 2.12%;非劣效性边际,-1.33%;WaldTest方法)。与第4周相比,第12周血压(BP)下降幅度更大。联合用药和160mg降压效果更好。结论:缬沙坦是台湾原发性高血压患者有效的治疗选择。
Efficacy and safety of valsartan in hypertensive Taiwanese patients: post-marketing surveillance study.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of valsartan in Taiwanese patients with essential hypertension.
Methods: This 12-week multi-center, open-label, observational, post-marketing surveillance study enrolled 2046 hypertensive patients who were prescribed valsartan 80 or 160 mg as monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensives based on clinical judgment. The primary endpoint was the incidence rate of dizziness with valsartan 160 mg monotherapy or combination therapy at Week 4. Secondary endpoints included the blood-pressure-lowering efficacy and the overall safety and tolerability of valsartan at Weeks 4 and 12.
Results: The monotherapy and combination groups had comparable baseline characteristics. At Week 4, monotherapy was found non-inferior to combination for incidence rate of dizziness (monotherapy, 9.25%; combination, 10%; difference in incidence of dizziness, 0.75%; 95% CI - 0.61% to 2.12%; non-inferiority margin, -1.33%;WaldTest approach). Greater blood pressure (BP) reduction was noted atWeek 12 than atWeek 4.The antihypertensive effect was greater with combination therapy and the 160-mg dose. BP control (systolic <140 mmHg or diastolic <90 mmHg) was achieved in 80-90% patients.Valsartan was well tolerated; most commonly reported adverse events included dizziness, headache, constipation and cough.
Conclusion: Valsartan is an effective treatment option for essential hypertension in Taiwanese patients.