缬沙坦对台湾高血压患者的疗效和安全性:上市后监测研究。

Chia-Wei Liou, Tung-Chen Yeh, I-Chung Chen, Chi-Hung Huang, Yi-Jen Hung, Kwan-Lih Hsu, Jian-Der Lee, Meng-Huan Lei, Kuan-Cheng Chang, Pei-Yung Liao, Zhih-Cherng Chen, Jackson Wang, Charles Jia-yin Hou
{"title":"缬沙坦对台湾高血压患者的疗效和安全性:上市后监测研究。","authors":"Chia-Wei Liou,&nbsp;Tung-Chen Yeh,&nbsp;I-Chung Chen,&nbsp;Chi-Hung Huang,&nbsp;Yi-Jen Hung,&nbsp;Kwan-Lih Hsu,&nbsp;Jian-Der Lee,&nbsp;Meng-Huan Lei,&nbsp;Kuan-Cheng Chang,&nbsp;Pei-Yung Liao,&nbsp;Zhih-Cherng Chen,&nbsp;Jackson Wang,&nbsp;Charles Jia-yin Hou","doi":"10.3109/08037051.2011.588458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of valsartan in Taiwanese patients with essential hypertension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This 12-week multi-center, open-label, observational, post-marketing surveillance study enrolled 2046 hypertensive patients who were prescribed valsartan 80 or 160 mg as monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensives based on clinical judgment. The primary endpoint was the incidence rate of dizziness with valsartan 160 mg monotherapy or combination therapy at Week 4. Secondary endpoints included the blood-pressure-lowering efficacy and the overall safety and tolerability of valsartan at Weeks 4 and 12.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The monotherapy and combination groups had comparable baseline characteristics. At Week 4, monotherapy was found non-inferior to combination for incidence rate of dizziness (monotherapy, 9.25%; combination, 10%; difference in incidence of dizziness, 0.75%; 95% CI - 0.61% to 2.12%; non-inferiority margin, -1.33%;WaldTest approach). Greater blood pressure (BP) reduction was noted atWeek 12 than atWeek 4.The antihypertensive effect was greater with combination therapy and the 160-mg dose. BP control (systolic <140 mmHg or diastolic <90 mmHg) was achieved in 80-90% patients.Valsartan was well tolerated; most commonly reported adverse events included dizziness, headache, constipation and cough.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Valsartan is an effective treatment option for essential hypertension in Taiwanese patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8974,"journal":{"name":"Blood pressure. Supplement","volume":"2 ","pages":"13-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/08037051.2011.588458","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of valsartan in hypertensive Taiwanese patients: post-marketing surveillance study.\",\"authors\":\"Chia-Wei Liou,&nbsp;Tung-Chen Yeh,&nbsp;I-Chung Chen,&nbsp;Chi-Hung Huang,&nbsp;Yi-Jen Hung,&nbsp;Kwan-Lih Hsu,&nbsp;Jian-Der Lee,&nbsp;Meng-Huan Lei,&nbsp;Kuan-Cheng Chang,&nbsp;Pei-Yung Liao,&nbsp;Zhih-Cherng Chen,&nbsp;Jackson Wang,&nbsp;Charles Jia-yin Hou\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/08037051.2011.588458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of valsartan in Taiwanese patients with essential hypertension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This 12-week multi-center, open-label, observational, post-marketing surveillance study enrolled 2046 hypertensive patients who were prescribed valsartan 80 or 160 mg as monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensives based on clinical judgment. The primary endpoint was the incidence rate of dizziness with valsartan 160 mg monotherapy or combination therapy at Week 4. Secondary endpoints included the blood-pressure-lowering efficacy and the overall safety and tolerability of valsartan at Weeks 4 and 12.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The monotherapy and combination groups had comparable baseline characteristics. At Week 4, monotherapy was found non-inferior to combination for incidence rate of dizziness (monotherapy, 9.25%; combination, 10%; difference in incidence of dizziness, 0.75%; 95% CI - 0.61% to 2.12%; non-inferiority margin, -1.33%;WaldTest approach). Greater blood pressure (BP) reduction was noted atWeek 12 than atWeek 4.The antihypertensive effect was greater with combination therapy and the 160-mg dose. BP control (systolic <140 mmHg or diastolic <90 mmHg) was achieved in 80-90% patients.Valsartan was well tolerated; most commonly reported adverse events included dizziness, headache, constipation and cough.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Valsartan is an effective treatment option for essential hypertension in Taiwanese patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood pressure. Supplement\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"13-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/08037051.2011.588458\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood pressure. Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/08037051.2011.588458\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood pressure. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/08037051.2011.588458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的:评价缬沙坦治疗台湾原发性高血压的疗效和安全性。方法:这项为期12周的多中心、开放标签、观察性、上市后监测研究纳入了2046例高血压患者,这些患者根据临床判断服用缬沙坦80或160 mg作为单药治疗或与其他抗高血压药物联合治疗。主要终点是第4周缬沙坦160 mg单药或联合治疗的头晕发生率。次要终点包括在第4周和第12周缬沙坦的降压效果、总体安全性和耐受性。结果:单药治疗组和联合治疗组具有相似的基线特征。在第4周,发现单药治疗的头晕发生率不低于联合治疗(单药治疗,9.25%;组合,10%;头晕发生率差异为0.75%;95% CI - 0.61% - 2.12%;非劣效性边际,-1.33%;WaldTest方法)。与第4周相比,第12周血压(BP)下降幅度更大。联合用药和160mg降压效果更好。结论:缬沙坦是台湾原发性高血压患者有效的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy and safety of valsartan in hypertensive Taiwanese patients: post-marketing surveillance study.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of valsartan in Taiwanese patients with essential hypertension.

Methods: This 12-week multi-center, open-label, observational, post-marketing surveillance study enrolled 2046 hypertensive patients who were prescribed valsartan 80 or 160 mg as monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensives based on clinical judgment. The primary endpoint was the incidence rate of dizziness with valsartan 160 mg monotherapy or combination therapy at Week 4. Secondary endpoints included the blood-pressure-lowering efficacy and the overall safety and tolerability of valsartan at Weeks 4 and 12.

Results: The monotherapy and combination groups had comparable baseline characteristics. At Week 4, monotherapy was found non-inferior to combination for incidence rate of dizziness (monotherapy, 9.25%; combination, 10%; difference in incidence of dizziness, 0.75%; 95% CI - 0.61% to 2.12%; non-inferiority margin, -1.33%;WaldTest approach). Greater blood pressure (BP) reduction was noted atWeek 12 than atWeek 4.The antihypertensive effect was greater with combination therapy and the 160-mg dose. BP control (systolic <140 mmHg or diastolic <90 mmHg) was achieved in 80-90% patients.Valsartan was well tolerated; most commonly reported adverse events included dizziness, headache, constipation and cough.

Conclusion: Valsartan is an effective treatment option for essential hypertension in Taiwanese patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Post-registration studies for the evaluation of antihypertensive drugs. Effect of fixed dose combinations of metoprolol and amlodipine in essential hypertension: MARS--a randomized controlled trial. Efficacy and safety of valsartan in hypertensive Taiwanese patients: post-marketing surveillance study. Efficacy and safety of early versus late titration of fixed-dose irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide: ACTUAL study. Clevidipine for severe hypertension in patients with renal dysfunction: a VELOCITY trial analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1