[采用巢式病例对照研究评价中药治疗糖尿病肾病的疗效]。

Zhao-lan Liu, Qing Li, Yu-jie Mu, Ying Gao, Jian-ping Liu
{"title":"[采用巢式病例对照研究评价中药治疗糖尿病肾病的疗效]。","authors":"Zhao-lan Liu,&nbsp;Qing Li,&nbsp;Yu-jie Mu,&nbsp;Ying Gao,&nbsp;Jian-ping Liu","doi":"10.3736/jcim20120907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>A nested case-control study was carried out to assess the effectiveness of Chinese medicines in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy, so as to explore the feasibility of using nested case-control study on effect assessment of Chinese medicine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nested case-control study was applied and the participants were enrolled from the subjects recruited in a cohort study. The cases and the controls were matched by 1 to 4 in age, gender, nationality and the stage of diabetic nephropathy when recruited in the cohort study. The EpiData 3.1 software was used for inputting data and SAS system was used for data analysis. Conditional logistic regress was applied to analyze the relationship between treatment and the progression of diabetic nephropathy. The study power was estimated and the sample sizes for case-control study and cohort study were recalculated based on the data from the cohort study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight cases and 32 controls were recruited in this study. The education level, ratio of drug withdrawal, change of therapy, syndrome differentiation and treatment were not significantly different in case and control groups. The progression of diabetic nephropathy was not significantly related with the treatment and the odds ratio (OR) value was 0.725 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.174 to 3.030. The statistical power of the study was 5%. To achieve the statistical power of 80%, 1 350 (270:1 080) participants were needed for 1:4 matched case-control study, 880 (440:440) for 1:1 paired case-control study, and 1 020 (510:510) for 1:1 control study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The treatment method is not significantly related with the progress of diabetic nephropathy. The nested case-control study is applicable in the therapeutic effect evaluation of Chinese medicine. Basic studies such as cross-sectional studies should be carried out to supply fundamental information for other types of studies including case-control study, cohort study and randomized clinical trials. Large sample size studies were needed to appraise the effect of Chinese medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":23993,"journal":{"name":"Zhong xi yi jie he xue bao = Journal of Chinese integrative medicine","volume":"10 9","pages":"991-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Using nested case-control study to appraise the effectiveness of Chinese medicines in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy].\",\"authors\":\"Zhao-lan Liu,&nbsp;Qing Li,&nbsp;Yu-jie Mu,&nbsp;Ying Gao,&nbsp;Jian-ping Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.3736/jcim20120907\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>A nested case-control study was carried out to assess the effectiveness of Chinese medicines in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy, so as to explore the feasibility of using nested case-control study on effect assessment of Chinese medicine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nested case-control study was applied and the participants were enrolled from the subjects recruited in a cohort study. The cases and the controls were matched by 1 to 4 in age, gender, nationality and the stage of diabetic nephropathy when recruited in the cohort study. The EpiData 3.1 software was used for inputting data and SAS system was used for data analysis. Conditional logistic regress was applied to analyze the relationship between treatment and the progression of diabetic nephropathy. The study power was estimated and the sample sizes for case-control study and cohort study were recalculated based on the data from the cohort study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight cases and 32 controls were recruited in this study. The education level, ratio of drug withdrawal, change of therapy, syndrome differentiation and treatment were not significantly different in case and control groups. The progression of diabetic nephropathy was not significantly related with the treatment and the odds ratio (OR) value was 0.725 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.174 to 3.030. The statistical power of the study was 5%. To achieve the statistical power of 80%, 1 350 (270:1 080) participants were needed for 1:4 matched case-control study, 880 (440:440) for 1:1 paired case-control study, and 1 020 (510:510) for 1:1 control study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The treatment method is not significantly related with the progress of diabetic nephropathy. The nested case-control study is applicable in the therapeutic effect evaluation of Chinese medicine. Basic studies such as cross-sectional studies should be carried out to supply fundamental information for other types of studies including case-control study, cohort study and randomized clinical trials. Large sample size studies were needed to appraise the effect of Chinese medicine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zhong xi yi jie he xue bao = Journal of Chinese integrative medicine\",\"volume\":\"10 9\",\"pages\":\"991-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zhong xi yi jie he xue bao = Journal of Chinese integrative medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3736/jcim20120907\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhong xi yi jie he xue bao = Journal of Chinese integrative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3736/jcim20120907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过巢式病例对照研究评价中药治疗糖尿病肾病的疗效,探讨采用巢式病例对照研究评价中药疗效的可行性。方法:采用巢式病例对照研究,参与者从队列研究中招募的受试者中招募。在队列研究中,病例和对照组在年龄、性别、国籍和糖尿病肾病分期方面的比例为1比4。数据输入采用EpiData 3.1软件,数据分析采用SAS系统。采用条件logistic回归分析治疗与糖尿病肾病进展的关系。根据队列研究的资料,估计研究威力,重新计算病例对照研究和队列研究的样本量。结果:本研究共纳入病例8例,对照组32例。病例组与对照组患者受教育程度、停药比例、治疗方法改变、辨证论治差异无统计学意义。糖尿病肾病的进展与治疗无显著相关,优势比(OR)值为0.725,95%可信区间为0.174 ~ 3.030。该研究的统计效力为5%。为达到80%的统计效力,1:4配对病例对照研究需要1350(270:1080)名受试者,1:1配对病例对照研究需要880(440:440)名受试者,1:1对照研究需要1020(510:510)名受试者。结论:治疗方法与糖尿病肾病的进展无显著相关。巢式病例对照研究适用于中药疗效评价。应开展横断面研究等基础研究,为病例对照研究、队列研究、随机临床试验等其他类型的研究提供基础信息。评估中药的效果需要大样本研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Using nested case-control study to appraise the effectiveness of Chinese medicines in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy].

Objective: A nested case-control study was carried out to assess the effectiveness of Chinese medicines in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy, so as to explore the feasibility of using nested case-control study on effect assessment of Chinese medicine.

Methods: Nested case-control study was applied and the participants were enrolled from the subjects recruited in a cohort study. The cases and the controls were matched by 1 to 4 in age, gender, nationality and the stage of diabetic nephropathy when recruited in the cohort study. The EpiData 3.1 software was used for inputting data and SAS system was used for data analysis. Conditional logistic regress was applied to analyze the relationship between treatment and the progression of diabetic nephropathy. The study power was estimated and the sample sizes for case-control study and cohort study were recalculated based on the data from the cohort study.

Results: Eight cases and 32 controls were recruited in this study. The education level, ratio of drug withdrawal, change of therapy, syndrome differentiation and treatment were not significantly different in case and control groups. The progression of diabetic nephropathy was not significantly related with the treatment and the odds ratio (OR) value was 0.725 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.174 to 3.030. The statistical power of the study was 5%. To achieve the statistical power of 80%, 1 350 (270:1 080) participants were needed for 1:4 matched case-control study, 880 (440:440) for 1:1 paired case-control study, and 1 020 (510:510) for 1:1 control study.

Conclusion: The treatment method is not significantly related with the progress of diabetic nephropathy. The nested case-control study is applicable in the therapeutic effect evaluation of Chinese medicine. Basic studies such as cross-sectional studies should be carried out to supply fundamental information for other types of studies including case-control study, cohort study and randomized clinical trials. Large sample size studies were needed to appraise the effect of Chinese medicine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Leaf extract of Alpinia purpurata (Vieill.) K. Schum screened for its phytochemical constituents and antibacterial and anticancer activities. Effects of Sisheng Decoction on the immunity and anti-stress function in mice with spleen deficiency syndrome. Estrogen-dependent effect of soy extract on pentylenetetrazole-induced seizures in rats. Effects of different extracts of Eugenia caryophyllata on pentylenetetrazole-induced seizures in mice. Effects of naringenin on allodynia and hyperalgesia in rats with chronic constriction injury-induced neuropathic pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1