计算机辅助规划和导航提高了骨盆模拟骨肿瘤手术的切割精度。

Q Medicine Computer Aided Surgery Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2012-11-26 DOI:10.3109/10929088.2012.744096
Olivier Cartiaux, Xavier Banse, Laurent Paul, Bernard G Francq, Carl-Éric Aubin, Pierre-Louis Docquier
{"title":"计算机辅助规划和导航提高了骨盆模拟骨肿瘤手术的切割精度。","authors":"Olivier Cartiaux,&nbsp;Xavier Banse,&nbsp;Laurent Paul,&nbsp;Bernard G Francq,&nbsp;Carl-Éric Aubin,&nbsp;Pierre-Louis Docquier","doi":"10.3109/10929088.2012.744096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Resection of bone tumors within the pelvis requires good cutting accuracy to achieve satisfactory safe margins. Manually controlled bone cutting can result in serious errors, especially due to the complex three-dimensional geometry, limited visibility, and restricted working space of the pelvic bone. This experimental study investigated cutting accuracy during navigated and non-navigated simulated bone tumor cutting in the pelvis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A periacetabular tumor resection was simulated using a pelvic bone model. Twenty-three operators (10 senior and 13 junior surgeons) were asked to perform the tumor cutting, initially according to a freehand procedure and later with the aid of a navigation system. Before cutting, each operator used preoperative planning software to define four target planes around the tumor with a 10-mm desired safe margin. After cutting, the location and flatness of the cut planes were measured, as well as the achieved surgical margins and the time required for each cutting procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The location of the cut planes with respect to the target planes was significantly improved by using the navigated cutting procedure, averaging 2.8 mm as compared to 11.2 mm for the freehand cutting procedure (p < 0.001). There was no intralesional tumor cutting when using the navigation system. The maximum difference between the achieved margins and the 10-mm desired safe margin was 6.5 mm with the navigated cutting process (compared to 13 mm with the freehand cutting process).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cutting accuracy during simulated bone cuts of the pelvis can be significantly improved by using a freehand process assisted by a navigation system. When fully validated with complementary in vivo studies, the planning and navigation-guided technologies that have been developed for the present study may improve bone cutting accuracy during pelvic tumor resection by providing clinically acceptable margins.</p>","PeriodicalId":50644,"journal":{"name":"Computer Aided Surgery","volume":"18 1-2","pages":"19-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/10929088.2012.744096","citationCount":"65","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computer-assisted planning and navigation improves cutting accuracy during simulated bone tumor surgery of the pelvis.\",\"authors\":\"Olivier Cartiaux,&nbsp;Xavier Banse,&nbsp;Laurent Paul,&nbsp;Bernard G Francq,&nbsp;Carl-Éric Aubin,&nbsp;Pierre-Louis Docquier\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/10929088.2012.744096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Resection of bone tumors within the pelvis requires good cutting accuracy to achieve satisfactory safe margins. Manually controlled bone cutting can result in serious errors, especially due to the complex three-dimensional geometry, limited visibility, and restricted working space of the pelvic bone. This experimental study investigated cutting accuracy during navigated and non-navigated simulated bone tumor cutting in the pelvis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A periacetabular tumor resection was simulated using a pelvic bone model. Twenty-three operators (10 senior and 13 junior surgeons) were asked to perform the tumor cutting, initially according to a freehand procedure and later with the aid of a navigation system. Before cutting, each operator used preoperative planning software to define four target planes around the tumor with a 10-mm desired safe margin. After cutting, the location and flatness of the cut planes were measured, as well as the achieved surgical margins and the time required for each cutting procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The location of the cut planes with respect to the target planes was significantly improved by using the navigated cutting procedure, averaging 2.8 mm as compared to 11.2 mm for the freehand cutting procedure (p < 0.001). There was no intralesional tumor cutting when using the navigation system. The maximum difference between the achieved margins and the 10-mm desired safe margin was 6.5 mm with the navigated cutting process (compared to 13 mm with the freehand cutting process).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cutting accuracy during simulated bone cuts of the pelvis can be significantly improved by using a freehand process assisted by a navigation system. When fully validated with complementary in vivo studies, the planning and navigation-guided technologies that have been developed for the present study may improve bone cutting accuracy during pelvic tumor resection by providing clinically acceptable margins.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Aided Surgery\",\"volume\":\"18 1-2\",\"pages\":\"19-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/10929088.2012.744096\",\"citationCount\":\"65\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Aided Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/10929088.2012.744096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/11/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Aided Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10929088.2012.744096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 65

摘要

背景:骨盆内骨肿瘤切除需要良好的切割精度以获得满意的安全切缘。人工控制的骨切割会导致严重的错误,特别是由于骨盆骨的三维几何形状复杂,能见度有限,工作空间有限。本实验研究探讨了导航和非导航模拟骨盆骨肿瘤切割的准确性。方法:采用骨盆骨模型模拟髋臼周围肿瘤切除术。23名外科医生(10名高级外科医生和13名初级外科医生)被要求进行肿瘤切割,最初根据徒手手术,后来在导航系统的帮助下进行。在切割之前,每位手术人员使用术前规划软件确定肿瘤周围的四个靶平面,期望的安全裕度为10mm。切割后,测量切割平面的位置和平整度,以及达到的手术切缘和每次切割所需的时间。结果:使用导航切割程序,切割平面相对于靶平面的位置显着改善,平均2.8 mm,而徒手切割程序为11.2 mm (p结论:在模拟骨盆骨切割过程中,使用导航系统辅助的徒手过程可以显着提高切割精度。当补充的体内研究充分验证后,为本研究开发的计划和导航引导技术可以通过提供临床可接受的边缘来提高骨盆肿瘤切除术时的骨切割准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Computer-assisted planning and navigation improves cutting accuracy during simulated bone tumor surgery of the pelvis.

Background: Resection of bone tumors within the pelvis requires good cutting accuracy to achieve satisfactory safe margins. Manually controlled bone cutting can result in serious errors, especially due to the complex three-dimensional geometry, limited visibility, and restricted working space of the pelvic bone. This experimental study investigated cutting accuracy during navigated and non-navigated simulated bone tumor cutting in the pelvis.

Methods: A periacetabular tumor resection was simulated using a pelvic bone model. Twenty-three operators (10 senior and 13 junior surgeons) were asked to perform the tumor cutting, initially according to a freehand procedure and later with the aid of a navigation system. Before cutting, each operator used preoperative planning software to define four target planes around the tumor with a 10-mm desired safe margin. After cutting, the location and flatness of the cut planes were measured, as well as the achieved surgical margins and the time required for each cutting procedure.

Results: The location of the cut planes with respect to the target planes was significantly improved by using the navigated cutting procedure, averaging 2.8 mm as compared to 11.2 mm for the freehand cutting procedure (p < 0.001). There was no intralesional tumor cutting when using the navigation system. The maximum difference between the achieved margins and the 10-mm desired safe margin was 6.5 mm with the navigated cutting process (compared to 13 mm with the freehand cutting process).

Conclusions: Cutting accuracy during simulated bone cuts of the pelvis can be significantly improved by using a freehand process assisted by a navigation system. When fully validated with complementary in vivo studies, the planning and navigation-guided technologies that have been developed for the present study may improve bone cutting accuracy during pelvic tumor resection by providing clinically acceptable margins.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computer Aided Surgery
Computer Aided Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
0.75
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Computer Aided Surgery encompasses all fields within surgery, as well as biomedical imaging and instrumentation, and digital technology employed as an adjunct to imaging in diagnosis, therapeutics, and surgery. Topics featured include frameless as well as conventional stereotaxic procedures, surgery guided by ultrasound, image guided focal irradiation, robotic surgery, and other therapeutic interventions that are performed with the use of digital imaging technology.
期刊最新文献
One-step reconstruction with a 3D-printed, biomechanically evaluated custom implant after complex pelvic tumor resection. Quantitative analysis of velopharyngeal movement using a stereoendoscope: accuracy and reliability of range images. Numerical simulation of blood flow and plaque progression in carotid-carotid bypass patient specific case. Towards the clinical integration of an image-guided navigation system for percutaneous liver tumor ablation using freehand 2D ultrasound images. A comparison of two surgical approaches in functional neurosurgery: individualized versus conventional stereotactic frames.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1