{"title":"机器人远端胰腺切除术是否提供与腹腔镜和开放手术相似的结果?来自单一医疗中心的比较研究。","authors":"Hipolito Duran, Benedetto Ielpo, Riccardo Caruso, Valentina Ferri, Yolanda Quijano, Eduardo Diaz, Isabel Fabra, Catalina Oliva, Sergio Olivares, Emilio Vicente","doi":"10.1002/rcs.1569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the field of pancreatic surgery, robotic surgery has yet to be evaluated against open and laparoscopic approaches. The outcomes of robotic surgery for distal pancreatectomy were analysed and the results compared with those of laparoscopic and open procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective reviews were made of 47 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy at our institution between 2008 and 2013 with three different approaches: 16 robotic, 18 laparoscopic and 13 open surgeries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant difference was observed in blood loss in the open group (mean 3.44 units) compared with the robotic (mean 0.5 units) and laparoscopic (0 units) technique (P = 0.046). A shorter hospital stay was observed for the robotic group (8.87 days) compared with the laparoscopic (19.16 days) and open groups (20.44 days) (P = 0.035). Morbidity was lower in the robotic group (0%) compared with the Laparoscopic (44%) and Open groups (46%) (P = 0.014).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings support the proposition that robotic distal pancreatectomy is as safe as the laparoscopic approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":75029,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS","volume":"10 3","pages":"280-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/rcs.1569","citationCount":"61","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does robotic distal pancreatectomy surgery offer similar results as laparoscopic and open approach? A comparative study from a single medical center.\",\"authors\":\"Hipolito Duran, Benedetto Ielpo, Riccardo Caruso, Valentina Ferri, Yolanda Quijano, Eduardo Diaz, Isabel Fabra, Catalina Oliva, Sergio Olivares, Emilio Vicente\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/rcs.1569\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the field of pancreatic surgery, robotic surgery has yet to be evaluated against open and laparoscopic approaches. The outcomes of robotic surgery for distal pancreatectomy were analysed and the results compared with those of laparoscopic and open procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective reviews were made of 47 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy at our institution between 2008 and 2013 with three different approaches: 16 robotic, 18 laparoscopic and 13 open surgeries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant difference was observed in blood loss in the open group (mean 3.44 units) compared with the robotic (mean 0.5 units) and laparoscopic (0 units) technique (P = 0.046). A shorter hospital stay was observed for the robotic group (8.87 days) compared with the laparoscopic (19.16 days) and open groups (20.44 days) (P = 0.035). Morbidity was lower in the robotic group (0%) compared with the Laparoscopic (44%) and Open groups (46%) (P = 0.014).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings support the proposition that robotic distal pancreatectomy is as safe as the laparoscopic approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"280-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/rcs.1569\",\"citationCount\":\"61\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1569\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/1/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does robotic distal pancreatectomy surgery offer similar results as laparoscopic and open approach? A comparative study from a single medical center.
Introduction: In the field of pancreatic surgery, robotic surgery has yet to be evaluated against open and laparoscopic approaches. The outcomes of robotic surgery for distal pancreatectomy were analysed and the results compared with those of laparoscopic and open procedures.
Methods: Retrospective reviews were made of 47 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy at our institution between 2008 and 2013 with three different approaches: 16 robotic, 18 laparoscopic and 13 open surgeries.
Results: A significant difference was observed in blood loss in the open group (mean 3.44 units) compared with the robotic (mean 0.5 units) and laparoscopic (0 units) technique (P = 0.046). A shorter hospital stay was observed for the robotic group (8.87 days) compared with the laparoscopic (19.16 days) and open groups (20.44 days) (P = 0.035). Morbidity was lower in the robotic group (0%) compared with the Laparoscopic (44%) and Open groups (46%) (P = 0.014).
Conclusions: These findings support the proposition that robotic distal pancreatectomy is as safe as the laparoscopic approach.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
