[记忆偏差在巴西青少年回忆法获得月经初潮年龄中的重要性]。

Silvia Diez Castilho, Luciana Bertoldi Nucci, Samanta Ramos Assuino, Lucca Ortolan Hansen
{"title":"[记忆偏差在巴西青少年回忆法获得月经初潮年龄中的重要性]。","authors":"Silvia Diez Castilho,&nbsp;Luciana Bertoldi Nucci,&nbsp;Samanta Ramos Assuino,&nbsp;Lucca Ortolan Hansen","doi":"10.1590/0004-2730000003080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the age at menarche obtained by recall method according to the time elapsed since the event, in order to verify the importance of the recall bias.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Were evaluated 1,671 girls (7-18 years) at schools in Campinas-SP regarding the occurrence of menarche by the status quo method (menarche: yes or no) and the recall method (date of menarche, for those who mentioned it). The age at menarche obtained by the status quo method was calculated by logit, which considers the whole group, and the age obtained by the recall method was calculated as the average of the mentioned age at menarche. In this group, the age at menarche was obtained by the difference between the date of the event and the date of birth. Girls who reported menarche (883, 52.8%) were divided into four groups according to the time elapsed since the event. To analyze the results, we used ANOVA and logistic regression for the analysis, with a significance level of 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The age at menarche calculated by logit was 12.14 y/o (95% CI 12.08 to 12.20). Mean ages obtained by recall were: for those who experienced menarche within the previous year 12.26 y/o (±1.14), between > 1-2 years before, 12.29 y (±1.22); between > 2-3 years before, 12.23 y/o (±1.27); and more than 3 years before, 11.55y/o (±1.24), p < 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The age at menarche obtained by the recall method was similar for girls who menstruated within the previous 3 years (and approaches the age calculated by logit); when more than 3 years have passed, the recall bias was significant.</p>","PeriodicalId":8395,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos brasileiros de endocrinologia e metabologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/0004-2730000003080","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The importance of memory bias in obtaining age of menarche by recall method in Brazilian adolescents].\",\"authors\":\"Silvia Diez Castilho,&nbsp;Luciana Bertoldi Nucci,&nbsp;Samanta Ramos Assuino,&nbsp;Lucca Ortolan Hansen\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0004-2730000003080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the age at menarche obtained by recall method according to the time elapsed since the event, in order to verify the importance of the recall bias.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Were evaluated 1,671 girls (7-18 years) at schools in Campinas-SP regarding the occurrence of menarche by the status quo method (menarche: yes or no) and the recall method (date of menarche, for those who mentioned it). The age at menarche obtained by the status quo method was calculated by logit, which considers the whole group, and the age obtained by the recall method was calculated as the average of the mentioned age at menarche. In this group, the age at menarche was obtained by the difference between the date of the event and the date of birth. Girls who reported menarche (883, 52.8%) were divided into four groups according to the time elapsed since the event. To analyze the results, we used ANOVA and logistic regression for the analysis, with a significance level of 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The age at menarche calculated by logit was 12.14 y/o (95% CI 12.08 to 12.20). Mean ages obtained by recall were: for those who experienced menarche within the previous year 12.26 y/o (±1.14), between > 1-2 years before, 12.29 y (±1.22); between > 2-3 years before, 12.23 y/o (±1.27); and more than 3 years before, 11.55y/o (±1.24), p < 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The age at menarche obtained by the recall method was similar for girls who menstruated within the previous 3 years (and approaches the age calculated by logit); when more than 3 years have passed, the recall bias was significant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arquivos brasileiros de endocrinologia e metabologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/0004-2730000003080\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arquivos brasileiros de endocrinologia e metabologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-2730000003080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos brasileiros de endocrinologia e metabologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-2730000003080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

目的:根据事件发生后的时间,比较回忆法获得的初潮年龄,以验证回忆偏倚的重要性。对象和方法:采用现状法(月经初潮:有或没有)和回忆法(月经初潮日期,提及者)对坎皮纳斯- sp学校1671名7-18岁女生月经初潮发生情况进行评估。现状法得到的初潮年龄采用logit计算,考虑整个群体,召回法得到的初潮年龄计算为上述初潮年龄的平均值。在这一组中,月经初潮的年龄是通过事件发生日期和出生日期之间的差异来获得的。报告月经初潮的女生(883,52.8%)根据月经初潮发生的时间分为四组。对结果进行分析,我们采用方差分析和逻辑回归进行分析,显著性水平为0.05。结果:经logit计算月经初潮年龄为12.14 y/o (95% CI 12.08 ~ 12.20)。回忆得到的平均年龄为:前一年初潮者12.26 y/o(±1.14),前1-2年者12.29 y(±1.22);> 2-3年前,12.23 y/o(±1.27);与3年前相比,11.55y/o(±1.24),p < 0.001。结论:前3年内来过月经的女生,用召回法得到的月经初潮年龄相近(且接近logit法计算的年龄);当时间超过3年时,回忆偏差显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[The importance of memory bias in obtaining age of menarche by recall method in Brazilian adolescents].

Objective: To compare the age at menarche obtained by recall method according to the time elapsed since the event, in order to verify the importance of the recall bias.

Subjects and methods: Were evaluated 1,671 girls (7-18 years) at schools in Campinas-SP regarding the occurrence of menarche by the status quo method (menarche: yes or no) and the recall method (date of menarche, for those who mentioned it). The age at menarche obtained by the status quo method was calculated by logit, which considers the whole group, and the age obtained by the recall method was calculated as the average of the mentioned age at menarche. In this group, the age at menarche was obtained by the difference between the date of the event and the date of birth. Girls who reported menarche (883, 52.8%) were divided into four groups according to the time elapsed since the event. To analyze the results, we used ANOVA and logistic regression for the analysis, with a significance level of 0.05.

Results: The age at menarche calculated by logit was 12.14 y/o (95% CI 12.08 to 12.20). Mean ages obtained by recall were: for those who experienced menarche within the previous year 12.26 y/o (±1.14), between > 1-2 years before, 12.29 y (±1.22); between > 2-3 years before, 12.23 y/o (±1.27); and more than 3 years before, 11.55y/o (±1.24), p < 0.001.

Conclusion: The age at menarche obtained by the recall method was similar for girls who menstruated within the previous 3 years (and approaches the age calculated by logit); when more than 3 years have passed, the recall bias was significant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊最新文献
[Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2]. [Thyroid hormone resistance syndrome]. A case of thyroid hormone resistance: a rare mutation. [Giant metastasis of thyroid papillar carcinoma]. Angiotensin-II induced insulin resistance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1