共同引领潮流:部落和学术伙伴在CBPR研究中的早期合作。

Pimatisiwin Pub Date : 2013-01-01
Heather S V Lonczak, Lisa Rey Thomas, Dennis Donovan, Lisette Austin, Robin L W Sigo, Nigel Lawrence
{"title":"共同引领潮流:部落和学术伙伴在CBPR研究中的早期合作。","authors":"Heather S V Lonczak, Lisa Rey Thomas, Dennis Donovan, Lisette Austin, Robin L W Sigo, Nigel Lawrence","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR) approaches stress the importance of building strong, cohesive collaborations between academic researchers and partnering communities; yet there is minimal research examining the actual quality of CBPR partnerships. The objective of the present paper is to describe and explore the quality of collaborative relationships across the first two years of the Healing of the Canoe project teams, comprised of researchers from the University of Washington and community partners from the Suquamish Tribe. Three quantitative/qualitative process measures were used to assess perceptions regarding collaborative processes and aspects of meeting effectiveness. Staff meetings were primarily viewed as cohesive, with clear agendas and shared communication. Collaborative processes were perceived as generally positive, with Tribal empowerment rated as especially important. Additionally, effective leadership and flexibility were highly rated while a need for a stronger community voice in decision-making was noted. Steady improvements were found in terms of trust between research teams, and both research teams reported a need for more intra-team project- and social-focused interaction. Overall, this data reveals a solid CBPR collaboration that is making effective strides in fostering a climate of respect, trust, and open communication between research partners.</p>","PeriodicalId":88633,"journal":{"name":"Pimatisiwin","volume":"11 3","pages":"395-409"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4209702/pdf/nihms-540641.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating the Tide Together: Early Collaboration between Tribal and Academic Partners in a CBPR Study.\",\"authors\":\"Heather S V Lonczak, Lisa Rey Thomas, Dennis Donovan, Lisette Austin, Robin L W Sigo, Nigel Lawrence\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR) approaches stress the importance of building strong, cohesive collaborations between academic researchers and partnering communities; yet there is minimal research examining the actual quality of CBPR partnerships. The objective of the present paper is to describe and explore the quality of collaborative relationships across the first two years of the Healing of the Canoe project teams, comprised of researchers from the University of Washington and community partners from the Suquamish Tribe. Three quantitative/qualitative process measures were used to assess perceptions regarding collaborative processes and aspects of meeting effectiveness. Staff meetings were primarily viewed as cohesive, with clear agendas and shared communication. Collaborative processes were perceived as generally positive, with Tribal empowerment rated as especially important. Additionally, effective leadership and flexibility were highly rated while a need for a stronger community voice in decision-making was noted. Steady improvements were found in terms of trust between research teams, and both research teams reported a need for more intra-team project- and social-focused interaction. Overall, this data reveals a solid CBPR collaboration that is making effective strides in fostering a climate of respect, trust, and open communication between research partners.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pimatisiwin\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"395-409\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4209702/pdf/nihms-540641.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pimatisiwin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pimatisiwin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于社区的参与式研究(CBPR)方法强调在学术研究人员和伙伴社区之间建立强有力的、有凝聚力的合作的重要性;然而,检验CBPR伙伴关系实际质量的研究却很少。本论文的目的是描述和探索独木舟项目团队头两年的合作关系质量,该团队由华盛顿大学的研究人员和苏夸米什部落的社区合作伙伴组成。三个定量/定性过程测量被用来评估关于协作过程和会议有效性方面的看法。工作人员会议主要被认为是有凝聚力的,有明确的议程和共同的沟通。协作过程通常被认为是积极的,部落授权被认为特别重要。此外,有效的领导和灵活性得到高度评价,同时指出需要在决策中有更大的社区发言权。在研究团队之间的信任方面发现了稳步的改善,两个研究团队都报告需要更多的团队内部项目和社会互动。总体而言,这些数据表明,在培养研究伙伴之间尊重、信任和开放沟通的氛围方面,CBPR合作正在取得有效进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Navigating the Tide Together: Early Collaboration between Tribal and Academic Partners in a CBPR Study.

Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR) approaches stress the importance of building strong, cohesive collaborations between academic researchers and partnering communities; yet there is minimal research examining the actual quality of CBPR partnerships. The objective of the present paper is to describe and explore the quality of collaborative relationships across the first two years of the Healing of the Canoe project teams, comprised of researchers from the University of Washington and community partners from the Suquamish Tribe. Three quantitative/qualitative process measures were used to assess perceptions regarding collaborative processes and aspects of meeting effectiveness. Staff meetings were primarily viewed as cohesive, with clear agendas and shared communication. Collaborative processes were perceived as generally positive, with Tribal empowerment rated as especially important. Additionally, effective leadership and flexibility were highly rated while a need for a stronger community voice in decision-making was noted. Steady improvements were found in terms of trust between research teams, and both research teams reported a need for more intra-team project- and social-focused interaction. Overall, this data reveals a solid CBPR collaboration that is making effective strides in fostering a climate of respect, trust, and open communication between research partners.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Community-university Research Liaisons: Translating the Languages of Research and Culture. Navigating the Tide Together: Early Collaboration between Tribal and Academic Partners in a CBPR Study. Indigenous Women of Latin America: Unintended Pregnancy, Unsafe Abortion, and Reproductive Health Outcomes. Health Is Life in Balance: Students and Communities Explore Healthy Lifestyles in a Culturally Based Curriculum. Life Story Board: A Tool in the Prevention of Domestic Violence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1