确定丹麦卫生中心的健康素养反应性改进理念:OS的初步测试!的方法。

Q2 Medicine Health literacy research and practice Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-12 DOI:10.3928/24748307-20220825-01
Anna Aaby, Helle Terkildsen Maindal
{"title":"确定丹麦卫生中心的健康素养反应性改进理念:OS的初步测试!的方法。","authors":"Anna Aaby,&nbsp;Helle Terkildsen Maindal","doi":"10.3928/24748307-20220825-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health services hold a critical role in mitigating the effect of health literacy challenges. Several tools and approaches have been developed to support health organizations in responding to their target population's health literacy needs. One of these is the OS! approach, which is an adapted and less rigorous version of the Australian Organizational health literacy responsiveness tool (Org-HLR). In this study, we aimed to report on our initial testing of the OS! approach in two Danish health care settings.</p><p><strong>Brief description: </strong>The OS! aim to prompt and support the development of local organizational health literacy improvement ideas. The process consists of three consecutive workshops focusing on reflection, self-evaluation, and prioritization. For each workshop tools are provided to support implementation.</p><p><strong>Implementation: </strong>The OS! approach was tested in two Danish municipal health centers (Tårnby Health Centre and Frederiksberg Health Centre), where both staff members and leaders took part in the processes (<i>N</i> = 62 and <i>N</i> = 84). In Tårnby, the process was closely facilitated by the research team, while local managers was in charge of the implementation in Frederiksberg.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both settings, the process succeeded in identifying a list of relevant prioritized action ideas aimed at improving local health literacy responsiveness. In both instances, leaders were able to integrate some of these ideas in action plans for the organizations nearby future.</p><p><strong>Lessons learned: </strong>We found the OS! approach effective in its aim to identify health literacy responsiveness improvement ideas and based on our experience also less arduous to implement than the Org-HLR. We also learned that good implementation of the OS! approach depends strongly on careful facilitation including thorough introduction of the concepts of health literacy, openness, and creativity in relation to local adaptions within the overall framework of the approach, and the consolidation of consistent leader support throughout the organization. [<b><i>HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice</i>. 2022;6(3):e232-e238.</b>] Plain Language Summary: This study describes the initial testing of the OS!</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>The OS! approach is based on the Australian methodology \"Org-HLR\" and use a participatory approach to prompt and support the identification of local health literacy responsiveness improvement ideas in health care organizations. The article provides valuable experiences regarding local development of organizational health literacy in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":36651,"journal":{"name":"Health literacy research and practice","volume":" ","pages":"e232-e238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/02/c4/hlrp0922aabybp-prt.PMC9469775.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying Health Literacy Responsiveness Improvement Ideas in Danish Health Centers: Initial Testing of the OS! Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Aaby,&nbsp;Helle Terkildsen Maindal\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/24748307-20220825-01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health services hold a critical role in mitigating the effect of health literacy challenges. Several tools and approaches have been developed to support health organizations in responding to their target population's health literacy needs. One of these is the OS! approach, which is an adapted and less rigorous version of the Australian Organizational health literacy responsiveness tool (Org-HLR). In this study, we aimed to report on our initial testing of the OS! approach in two Danish health care settings.</p><p><strong>Brief description: </strong>The OS! aim to prompt and support the development of local organizational health literacy improvement ideas. The process consists of three consecutive workshops focusing on reflection, self-evaluation, and prioritization. For each workshop tools are provided to support implementation.</p><p><strong>Implementation: </strong>The OS! approach was tested in two Danish municipal health centers (Tårnby Health Centre and Frederiksberg Health Centre), where both staff members and leaders took part in the processes (<i>N</i> = 62 and <i>N</i> = 84). In Tårnby, the process was closely facilitated by the research team, while local managers was in charge of the implementation in Frederiksberg.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both settings, the process succeeded in identifying a list of relevant prioritized action ideas aimed at improving local health literacy responsiveness. In both instances, leaders were able to integrate some of these ideas in action plans for the organizations nearby future.</p><p><strong>Lessons learned: </strong>We found the OS! approach effective in its aim to identify health literacy responsiveness improvement ideas and based on our experience also less arduous to implement than the Org-HLR. We also learned that good implementation of the OS! approach depends strongly on careful facilitation including thorough introduction of the concepts of health literacy, openness, and creativity in relation to local adaptions within the overall framework of the approach, and the consolidation of consistent leader support throughout the organization. [<b><i>HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice</i>. 2022;6(3):e232-e238.</b>] Plain Language Summary: This study describes the initial testing of the OS!</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>The OS! approach is based on the Australian methodology \\\"Org-HLR\\\" and use a participatory approach to prompt and support the identification of local health literacy responsiveness improvement ideas in health care organizations. The article provides valuable experiences regarding local development of organizational health literacy in practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health literacy research and practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e232-e238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/02/c4/hlrp0922aabybp-prt.PMC9469775.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health literacy research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20220825-01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/9/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health literacy research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20220825-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:卫生服务在减轻卫生知识普及挑战的影响方面发挥着关键作用。已经制定了若干工具和办法,以支持卫生组织满足其目标人群的卫生知识普及需求。其中之一就是操作系统!该方法是澳大利亚组织卫生素养响应工具(Org-HLR)的改编版,但不那么严格。在这项研究中,我们的目的是报告我们对操作系统的初步测试!方法在两个丹麦卫生保健机构。简要描述:The OS!旨在促进和支持地方组织健康素养提升理念的发展。这个过程包括三个连续的研讨会,重点是反思、自我评估和优先排序。为每个车间提供了支持实现的工具。实现:操作系统!在丹麦的两个市级保健中心(t伦比保健中心和腓特烈斯堡保健中心)对这种方法进行了试验,工作人员和领导都参加了这一过程(N = 62和N = 84)。在塔塔伦比,研究小组密切促进了这一进程,而当地管理人员则负责在腓特烈斯堡的执行工作。结果:在这两种情况下,这一进程成功地确定了一系列相关的优先行动想法,旨在提高当地卫生知识普及的响应能力。在这两个例子中,领导者都能够将其中的一些想法整合到组织近期的行动计划中。经验教训:我们找到了操作系统!方法有效,其目的是确定卫生扫盲反应能力改进的想法,根据我们的经验,也比Org-HLR更容易实施。我们还学会了很好的操作系统实现!该方法在很大程度上取决于谨慎的促进,包括在该方法的总体框架内彻底引入卫生知识普及、开放和创造性等概念,以便在地方进行调整,并在整个组织内巩固领导的一贯支持。健康素养研究与实践[j] .中国医学工程学报,2010;6(3):832 - 838。摘要:本研究描述了操作系统的初始测试!方法:操作系统!该方法以澳大利亚的"Org-HLR"方法为基础,采用参与性方法,促进和支持确定卫生保健组织的地方卫生扫盲反应能力改进想法。本文在实践中为地方组织健康素养的发展提供了宝贵的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Identifying Health Literacy Responsiveness Improvement Ideas in Danish Health Centers: Initial Testing of the OS! Approach.

Background: Health services hold a critical role in mitigating the effect of health literacy challenges. Several tools and approaches have been developed to support health organizations in responding to their target population's health literacy needs. One of these is the OS! approach, which is an adapted and less rigorous version of the Australian Organizational health literacy responsiveness tool (Org-HLR). In this study, we aimed to report on our initial testing of the OS! approach in two Danish health care settings.

Brief description: The OS! aim to prompt and support the development of local organizational health literacy improvement ideas. The process consists of three consecutive workshops focusing on reflection, self-evaluation, and prioritization. For each workshop tools are provided to support implementation.

Implementation: The OS! approach was tested in two Danish municipal health centers (Tårnby Health Centre and Frederiksberg Health Centre), where both staff members and leaders took part in the processes (N = 62 and N = 84). In Tårnby, the process was closely facilitated by the research team, while local managers was in charge of the implementation in Frederiksberg.

Results: In both settings, the process succeeded in identifying a list of relevant prioritized action ideas aimed at improving local health literacy responsiveness. In both instances, leaders were able to integrate some of these ideas in action plans for the organizations nearby future.

Lessons learned: We found the OS! approach effective in its aim to identify health literacy responsiveness improvement ideas and based on our experience also less arduous to implement than the Org-HLR. We also learned that good implementation of the OS! approach depends strongly on careful facilitation including thorough introduction of the concepts of health literacy, openness, and creativity in relation to local adaptions within the overall framework of the approach, and the consolidation of consistent leader support throughout the organization. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2022;6(3):e232-e238.] Plain Language Summary: This study describes the initial testing of the OS!

Approach: The OS! approach is based on the Australian methodology "Org-HLR" and use a participatory approach to prompt and support the identification of local health literacy responsiveness improvement ideas in health care organizations. The article provides valuable experiences regarding local development of organizational health literacy in practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health literacy research and practice
Health literacy research and practice Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Relation Between Health Literacy, Infodemic, and Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination in Iran: A Cross-Sectional Study. Health Literacy and Adherence to Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study in Portugal. Association of Social Determinants of Health With Hospital Readmission and Mortality: A Prospective Cohort Study. Health Literacy Directed Weight Loss Intervention in Primary Care Clinics. Get Health'e': A Pilot Test of a Digital Health Literacy Intervention for Young Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1