潜在变量模型的混合因果搜索算法。

Juan Miguel Ogarrio, Peter Spirtes, Joe Ramsey
{"title":"潜在变量模型的混合因果搜索算法。","authors":"Juan Miguel Ogarrio,&nbsp;Peter Spirtes,&nbsp;Joe Ramsey","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Existing score-based causal model search algorithms such as <i>GES</i> (and a speeded up version, <i>FGS</i>) are asymptotically correct, fast, and reliable, but make the unrealistic assumption that the true causal graph does not contain any unmeasured confounders. There are several constraint-based causal search algorithms (e.g <i>RFCI, FCI</i>, or <i>FCI</i>+) that are asymptotically correct without assuming that there are no unmeasured confounders, but often perform poorly on small samples. We describe a combined score and constraint-based algorithm, <i>GFCI</i>, that we prove is asymptotically correct. On synthetic data, <i>GFCI</i> is only slightly slower than <i>RFCI</i> but more accurate than <i>FCI, RFCI</i> and <i>FCI</i>+.</p>","PeriodicalId":89793,"journal":{"name":"JMLR workshop and conference proceedings","volume":"52 ","pages":"368-379"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5325717/pdf/nihms845582.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Hybrid Causal Search Algorithm for Latent Variable Models.\",\"authors\":\"Juan Miguel Ogarrio,&nbsp;Peter Spirtes,&nbsp;Joe Ramsey\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Existing score-based causal model search algorithms such as <i>GES</i> (and a speeded up version, <i>FGS</i>) are asymptotically correct, fast, and reliable, but make the unrealistic assumption that the true causal graph does not contain any unmeasured confounders. There are several constraint-based causal search algorithms (e.g <i>RFCI, FCI</i>, or <i>FCI</i>+) that are asymptotically correct without assuming that there are no unmeasured confounders, but often perform poorly on small samples. We describe a combined score and constraint-based algorithm, <i>GFCI</i>, that we prove is asymptotically correct. On synthetic data, <i>GFCI</i> is only slightly slower than <i>RFCI</i> but more accurate than <i>FCI, RFCI</i> and <i>FCI</i>+.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMLR workshop and conference proceedings\",\"volume\":\"52 \",\"pages\":\"368-379\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5325717/pdf/nihms845582.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMLR workshop and conference proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMLR workshop and conference proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现有的基于分数的因果模型搜索算法,如GES(和一个加速版本,FGS)是渐进正确、快速和可靠的,但它做出了一个不切实际的假设,即真正的因果图不包含任何不可测量的混杂因素。有几种基于约束的因果搜索算法(如RFCI、FCI或FCI+)在不假设没有未测量混杂因素的情况下是渐近正确的,但在小样本上往往表现不佳。我们描述了一个结合分数和约束的算法,GFCI,我们证明了它是渐近正确的。在综合数据上,GFCI仅比RFCI略慢,但比FCI、RFCI和FCI+更准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Hybrid Causal Search Algorithm for Latent Variable Models.

Existing score-based causal model search algorithms such as GES (and a speeded up version, FGS) are asymptotically correct, fast, and reliable, but make the unrealistic assumption that the true causal graph does not contain any unmeasured confounders. There are several constraint-based causal search algorithms (e.g RFCI, FCI, or FCI+) that are asymptotically correct without assuming that there are no unmeasured confounders, but often perform poorly on small samples. We describe a combined score and constraint-based algorithm, GFCI, that we prove is asymptotically correct. On synthetic data, GFCI is only slightly slower than RFCI but more accurate than FCI, RFCI and FCI+.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Scalable Convex Multiple Sequence Alignment via Entropy-Regularized Dual Decomposition. Greedy Direction Method of Multiplier for MAP Inference of Large Output Domain. A Hybrid Causal Search Algorithm for Latent Variable Models. Doctor AI: Predicting Clinical Events via Recurrent Neural Networks. Uncovering Voice Misuse Using Symbolic Mismatch.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1