{"title":"潜在变量模型的混合因果搜索算法。","authors":"Juan Miguel Ogarrio, Peter Spirtes, Joe Ramsey","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Existing score-based causal model search algorithms such as <i>GES</i> (and a speeded up version, <i>FGS</i>) are asymptotically correct, fast, and reliable, but make the unrealistic assumption that the true causal graph does not contain any unmeasured confounders. There are several constraint-based causal search algorithms (e.g <i>RFCI, FCI</i>, or <i>FCI</i>+) that are asymptotically correct without assuming that there are no unmeasured confounders, but often perform poorly on small samples. We describe a combined score and constraint-based algorithm, <i>GFCI</i>, that we prove is asymptotically correct. On synthetic data, <i>GFCI</i> is only slightly slower than <i>RFCI</i> but more accurate than <i>FCI, RFCI</i> and <i>FCI</i>+.</p>","PeriodicalId":89793,"journal":{"name":"JMLR workshop and conference proceedings","volume":"52 ","pages":"368-379"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5325717/pdf/nihms845582.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Hybrid Causal Search Algorithm for Latent Variable Models.\",\"authors\":\"Juan Miguel Ogarrio, Peter Spirtes, Joe Ramsey\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Existing score-based causal model search algorithms such as <i>GES</i> (and a speeded up version, <i>FGS</i>) are asymptotically correct, fast, and reliable, but make the unrealistic assumption that the true causal graph does not contain any unmeasured confounders. There are several constraint-based causal search algorithms (e.g <i>RFCI, FCI</i>, or <i>FCI</i>+) that are asymptotically correct without assuming that there are no unmeasured confounders, but often perform poorly on small samples. We describe a combined score and constraint-based algorithm, <i>GFCI</i>, that we prove is asymptotically correct. On synthetic data, <i>GFCI</i> is only slightly slower than <i>RFCI</i> but more accurate than <i>FCI, RFCI</i> and <i>FCI</i>+.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMLR workshop and conference proceedings\",\"volume\":\"52 \",\"pages\":\"368-379\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5325717/pdf/nihms845582.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMLR workshop and conference proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMLR workshop and conference proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Hybrid Causal Search Algorithm for Latent Variable Models.
Existing score-based causal model search algorithms such as GES (and a speeded up version, FGS) are asymptotically correct, fast, and reliable, but make the unrealistic assumption that the true causal graph does not contain any unmeasured confounders. There are several constraint-based causal search algorithms (e.g RFCI, FCI, or FCI+) that are asymptotically correct without assuming that there are no unmeasured confounders, but often perform poorly on small samples. We describe a combined score and constraint-based algorithm, GFCI, that we prove is asymptotically correct. On synthetic data, GFCI is only slightly slower than RFCI but more accurate than FCI, RFCI and FCI+.