Lasker/IRRF弱视倡议总结。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Visual Neuroscience Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1017/S0952523817000268
John E Dowling
{"title":"Lasker/IRRF弱视倡议总结。","authors":"John E Dowling","doi":"10.1017/S0952523817000268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"All agree that amblyopia is a disorder that affects visual structures beyond the eye. Many simply say that amblyopia is a brain disorder. But the retina is part of the brain, pushed out into the eye during development. As someone who has long studied the retina, I wonder if the retina is at all affected. At first glance, retinal function appears normal in amblyopia, but is it totally unaltered? I am not convinced, but as yet, nothing of significance has been shown in this regard. The reasons I suggest this are three fold: first, there are centrifugal fibers from higher visual structures that innervate the retina and alterations in higher visual pathways could very well affect the retina. Second, as noted many times in this report, there are many visual deficits that occur in amblyopia—it is not just a defect in visual acuity but in contrast sensitivity, accommodation, fixation, binocularity, and so forth. Third, some visual alterations are seen in the other eye in unilateral amblyopia and suggest to me that a closer examination of retinal function in amblyopia might be useful to undertake. I am not suggesting that retinal changes are the major alterations in amblyopia; clearly, the major effects of amblyopia are manifest in the cortex. But where in the cortex? Beginning in area V1 but certainly in higher visual areas as well and even, probably, in other nonvisual areas. The bottom line is that amblyopia is a very complex disorder consisting of several different forms, each of which is expressed somewhat differently. Today, throughout the world, we are focusing enormous effort on studies of the brain structure and function, and many of the major issues regarding how the brain functions are the front and center in amblyopia research. In other words, findings in amblyopia research are instructive in terms of understanding the brain function and vice versa. A prime example is that of brain plasticity—how hard wired are our brains? Our views on this have changed dramatically over the past half century, beginning with the pioneering studies of Wiesel and Hubel on monocular visual deprivation in cats and monkeys. Dramatic changes in structure and function occur in area V1 of the cortex often after just a relatively short period of deprivation. And as was learned from the clinic, the changes in amblyopia occur most dramatically in the young, during the so-called critical period. It was also recognized in the clinic that if recovery was to be achieved, it happened most readily by interventions in the critical period. All of the above are certainly correct, but what has changed is our understanding of critical periods—when the nervous system is modifiable. Whereas it was once viewed that the critical period was finite, we now recognize that it is not. Brain plasticity can occur all of our lives, although as we grow older it does decline. As described in several of the reviews in this volume, critical periods can be extended and even reopened by various manipulations, by the administration of drugs and other neuroactive substances, by brain stimulation and even by environmental and behavioral treatments. Further, we now recognize that various visual phenomena have different critical periods in terms of timing. All of this research is beginning to have a clinical impact. It was believed that recovery from amblyopia in humans could not happen in adulthood; however, this view has now softened, and various approaches to this possibility are being explored. Clearly, there is great variability in the response of older individuals to these therapies, so we still have much to learn. That our brain circuitry can be altered throughout our lives by neurons growing new dendrites and forming new synapses, research pioneered by visual deprivation studies, has an impact far beyond amblyopia. Indeed, our view today is that the brain is continually changing by everything we do and experience. A paradigm shift in our thinking, it has immense implications on understanding how the brain develops, how it ages, and on how we treat various brain disorders and degenerative diseases. We hope this report will be useful not only for those studying amblyopia but for brain science in general. PersPective","PeriodicalId":23556,"journal":{"name":"Visual Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0952523817000268","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concluding remarks on the Lasker/IRRF initiative on amblyopia.\",\"authors\":\"John E Dowling\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0952523817000268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"All agree that amblyopia is a disorder that affects visual structures beyond the eye. Many simply say that amblyopia is a brain disorder. But the retina is part of the brain, pushed out into the eye during development. As someone who has long studied the retina, I wonder if the retina is at all affected. At first glance, retinal function appears normal in amblyopia, but is it totally unaltered? I am not convinced, but as yet, nothing of significance has been shown in this regard. The reasons I suggest this are three fold: first, there are centrifugal fibers from higher visual structures that innervate the retina and alterations in higher visual pathways could very well affect the retina. Second, as noted many times in this report, there are many visual deficits that occur in amblyopia—it is not just a defect in visual acuity but in contrast sensitivity, accommodation, fixation, binocularity, and so forth. Third, some visual alterations are seen in the other eye in unilateral amblyopia and suggest to me that a closer examination of retinal function in amblyopia might be useful to undertake. I am not suggesting that retinal changes are the major alterations in amblyopia; clearly, the major effects of amblyopia are manifest in the cortex. But where in the cortex? Beginning in area V1 but certainly in higher visual areas as well and even, probably, in other nonvisual areas. The bottom line is that amblyopia is a very complex disorder consisting of several different forms, each of which is expressed somewhat differently. Today, throughout the world, we are focusing enormous effort on studies of the brain structure and function, and many of the major issues regarding how the brain functions are the front and center in amblyopia research. In other words, findings in amblyopia research are instructive in terms of understanding the brain function and vice versa. A prime example is that of brain plasticity—how hard wired are our brains? Our views on this have changed dramatically over the past half century, beginning with the pioneering studies of Wiesel and Hubel on monocular visual deprivation in cats and monkeys. Dramatic changes in structure and function occur in area V1 of the cortex often after just a relatively short period of deprivation. And as was learned from the clinic, the changes in amblyopia occur most dramatically in the young, during the so-called critical period. It was also recognized in the clinic that if recovery was to be achieved, it happened most readily by interventions in the critical period. All of the above are certainly correct, but what has changed is our understanding of critical periods—when the nervous system is modifiable. Whereas it was once viewed that the critical period was finite, we now recognize that it is not. Brain plasticity can occur all of our lives, although as we grow older it does decline. As described in several of the reviews in this volume, critical periods can be extended and even reopened by various manipulations, by the administration of drugs and other neuroactive substances, by brain stimulation and even by environmental and behavioral treatments. Further, we now recognize that various visual phenomena have different critical periods in terms of timing. All of this research is beginning to have a clinical impact. It was believed that recovery from amblyopia in humans could not happen in adulthood; however, this view has now softened, and various approaches to this possibility are being explored. Clearly, there is great variability in the response of older individuals to these therapies, so we still have much to learn. That our brain circuitry can be altered throughout our lives by neurons growing new dendrites and forming new synapses, research pioneered by visual deprivation studies, has an impact far beyond amblyopia. Indeed, our view today is that the brain is continually changing by everything we do and experience. A paradigm shift in our thinking, it has immense implications on understanding how the brain develops, how it ages, and on how we treat various brain disorders and degenerative diseases. We hope this report will be useful not only for those studying amblyopia but for brain science in general. PersPective\",\"PeriodicalId\":23556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Visual Neuroscience\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0952523817000268\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Visual Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952523817000268\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visual Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952523817000268","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Concluding remarks on the Lasker/IRRF initiative on amblyopia.
All agree that amblyopia is a disorder that affects visual structures beyond the eye. Many simply say that amblyopia is a brain disorder. But the retina is part of the brain, pushed out into the eye during development. As someone who has long studied the retina, I wonder if the retina is at all affected. At first glance, retinal function appears normal in amblyopia, but is it totally unaltered? I am not convinced, but as yet, nothing of significance has been shown in this regard. The reasons I suggest this are three fold: first, there are centrifugal fibers from higher visual structures that innervate the retina and alterations in higher visual pathways could very well affect the retina. Second, as noted many times in this report, there are many visual deficits that occur in amblyopia—it is not just a defect in visual acuity but in contrast sensitivity, accommodation, fixation, binocularity, and so forth. Third, some visual alterations are seen in the other eye in unilateral amblyopia and suggest to me that a closer examination of retinal function in amblyopia might be useful to undertake. I am not suggesting that retinal changes are the major alterations in amblyopia; clearly, the major effects of amblyopia are manifest in the cortex. But where in the cortex? Beginning in area V1 but certainly in higher visual areas as well and even, probably, in other nonvisual areas. The bottom line is that amblyopia is a very complex disorder consisting of several different forms, each of which is expressed somewhat differently. Today, throughout the world, we are focusing enormous effort on studies of the brain structure and function, and many of the major issues regarding how the brain functions are the front and center in amblyopia research. In other words, findings in amblyopia research are instructive in terms of understanding the brain function and vice versa. A prime example is that of brain plasticity—how hard wired are our brains? Our views on this have changed dramatically over the past half century, beginning with the pioneering studies of Wiesel and Hubel on monocular visual deprivation in cats and monkeys. Dramatic changes in structure and function occur in area V1 of the cortex often after just a relatively short period of deprivation. And as was learned from the clinic, the changes in amblyopia occur most dramatically in the young, during the so-called critical period. It was also recognized in the clinic that if recovery was to be achieved, it happened most readily by interventions in the critical period. All of the above are certainly correct, but what has changed is our understanding of critical periods—when the nervous system is modifiable. Whereas it was once viewed that the critical period was finite, we now recognize that it is not. Brain plasticity can occur all of our lives, although as we grow older it does decline. As described in several of the reviews in this volume, critical periods can be extended and even reopened by various manipulations, by the administration of drugs and other neuroactive substances, by brain stimulation and even by environmental and behavioral treatments. Further, we now recognize that various visual phenomena have different critical periods in terms of timing. All of this research is beginning to have a clinical impact. It was believed that recovery from amblyopia in humans could not happen in adulthood; however, this view has now softened, and various approaches to this possibility are being explored. Clearly, there is great variability in the response of older individuals to these therapies, so we still have much to learn. That our brain circuitry can be altered throughout our lives by neurons growing new dendrites and forming new synapses, research pioneered by visual deprivation studies, has an impact far beyond amblyopia. Indeed, our view today is that the brain is continually changing by everything we do and experience. A paradigm shift in our thinking, it has immense implications on understanding how the brain develops, how it ages, and on how we treat various brain disorders and degenerative diseases. We hope this report will be useful not only for those studying amblyopia but for brain science in general. PersPective
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Visual Neuroscience
Visual Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
8
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Visual Neuroscience is an international journal devoted to the publication of experimental and theoretical research on biological mechanisms of vision. A major goal of publication is to bring together in one journal a broad range of studies that reflect the diversity and originality of all aspects of neuroscience research relating to the visual system. Contributions may address molecular, cellular or systems-level processes in either vertebrate or invertebrate species. The journal publishes work based on a wide range of technical approaches, including molecular genetics, anatomy, physiology, psychophysics and imaging, and utilizing comparative, developmental, theoretical or computational approaches to understand the biology of vision and visuo-motor control. The journal also publishes research seeking to understand disorders of the visual system and strategies for restoring vision. Studies based exclusively on clinical, psychophysiological or behavioral data are welcomed, provided that they address questions concerning neural mechanisms of vision or provide insight into visual dysfunction.
期刊最新文献
Chemically induced cone degeneration in the 13-lined ground squirrel. Pre-stimulus bioelectrical activity in lightadapted ERG under blue versus white background - CORRIGENDUM. Evolution of the visual system in ray-finned fishes. Pre-stimulus bioelectrical activity in light-adapted ERG under blue versus white background Two mechanisms for direction selectivity in a model of the primate starburst amacrine cell.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1