病理学研究的设计、实施和报告,以实现动物模型转化研究的严谨性和可重复性。

IF 3.1 3区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES Ilar Journal Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.1093/ilar/ily020
Jeffrey I Everitt, Piper M Treuting, Cheryl Scudamore, Rani Sellers, Patricia V Turner, Jerrold M Ward, Caroline J Zeiss
{"title":"病理学研究的设计、实施和报告,以实现动物模型转化研究的严谨性和可重复性。","authors":"Jeffrey I Everitt,&nbsp;Piper M Treuting,&nbsp;Cheryl Scudamore,&nbsp;Rani Sellers,&nbsp;Patricia V Turner,&nbsp;Jerrold M Ward,&nbsp;Caroline J Zeiss","doi":"10.1093/ilar/ily020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In translational research, animal models are an important tool to aid in decision-making when taking potential therapies into human clinical trials. Recently, there have been a number of papers that have suggested limited concordance of preclinical animal experiments with subsequent human clinical experience. Assessments of preclinical animal studies have led to concerns about the reproducibility of data and have highlighted the need for an emphasis on rigor and quality in the planning, conduct, analysis, and reporting of such studies. The incorporation of a wider role for the comparative pathologist using pathology best practices in the planning and conduct of animal model-based research is one way to increase the quality and reproducibility of data. The use of optimal design and planning of tissue collection, incorporation of pathology methods into written protocols, conduct of pathology procedures using accepted best practices, and the use of optimal pathology analysis and reporting methods enhance the quality of the data acquired from many types of preclinical animal models and studies. Many of these pathology practices are well established in the discipline of toxicologic pathology and have a proven and useful track record in enhancing the data from animal-based studies used in safety assessment of human therapeutics. Some of this experience can be adopted by the wider community of preclinical investigators to increase the reproducibility of animal study data.</p>","PeriodicalId":56299,"journal":{"name":"Ilar Journal","volume":"59 1","pages":"4-12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/ilar/ily020","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pathology Study Design, Conduct, and Reporting to Achieve Rigor and Reproducibility in Translational Research Using Animal Models.\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey I Everitt,&nbsp;Piper M Treuting,&nbsp;Cheryl Scudamore,&nbsp;Rani Sellers,&nbsp;Patricia V Turner,&nbsp;Jerrold M Ward,&nbsp;Caroline J Zeiss\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ilar/ily020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In translational research, animal models are an important tool to aid in decision-making when taking potential therapies into human clinical trials. Recently, there have been a number of papers that have suggested limited concordance of preclinical animal experiments with subsequent human clinical experience. Assessments of preclinical animal studies have led to concerns about the reproducibility of data and have highlighted the need for an emphasis on rigor and quality in the planning, conduct, analysis, and reporting of such studies. The incorporation of a wider role for the comparative pathologist using pathology best practices in the planning and conduct of animal model-based research is one way to increase the quality and reproducibility of data. The use of optimal design and planning of tissue collection, incorporation of pathology methods into written protocols, conduct of pathology procedures using accepted best practices, and the use of optimal pathology analysis and reporting methods enhance the quality of the data acquired from many types of preclinical animal models and studies. Many of these pathology practices are well established in the discipline of toxicologic pathology and have a proven and useful track record in enhancing the data from animal-based studies used in safety assessment of human therapeutics. Some of this experience can be adopted by the wider community of preclinical investigators to increase the reproducibility of animal study data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ilar Journal\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"4-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/ilar/ily020\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ilar Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar/ily020\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ilar Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar/ily020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在转化研究中,动物模型是一个重要的工具,以帮助决策时采取潜在的治疗进入人体临床试验。最近,有一些论文提出临床前动物实验与随后的人类临床经验的有限一致性。对临床前动物研究的评估引起了人们对数据可重复性的担忧,并强调了在此类研究的计划、实施、分析和报告中强调严谨性和质量的必要性。在动物模型研究的规划和实施中,运用病理学最佳实践,使比较病理学家发挥更广泛的作用,是提高数据质量和可重复性的一种方法。使用组织收集的最佳设计和规划,将病理方法纳入书面协议,使用公认的最佳实践进行病理程序,以及使用最佳病理分析和报告方法,提高了从许多类型的临床前动物模型和研究中获得的数据的质量。这些病理学实践中的许多在毒理学病理学学科中已经建立起来,并且在加强用于人类治疗安全性评估的动物研究数据方面具有经过验证和有用的记录。其中一些经验可以被更广泛的临床前研究人员所采用,以提高动物研究数据的可重复性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pathology Study Design, Conduct, and Reporting to Achieve Rigor and Reproducibility in Translational Research Using Animal Models.

In translational research, animal models are an important tool to aid in decision-making when taking potential therapies into human clinical trials. Recently, there have been a number of papers that have suggested limited concordance of preclinical animal experiments with subsequent human clinical experience. Assessments of preclinical animal studies have led to concerns about the reproducibility of data and have highlighted the need for an emphasis on rigor and quality in the planning, conduct, analysis, and reporting of such studies. The incorporation of a wider role for the comparative pathologist using pathology best practices in the planning and conduct of animal model-based research is one way to increase the quality and reproducibility of data. The use of optimal design and planning of tissue collection, incorporation of pathology methods into written protocols, conduct of pathology procedures using accepted best practices, and the use of optimal pathology analysis and reporting methods enhance the quality of the data acquired from many types of preclinical animal models and studies. Many of these pathology practices are well established in the discipline of toxicologic pathology and have a proven and useful track record in enhancing the data from animal-based studies used in safety assessment of human therapeutics. Some of this experience can be adopted by the wider community of preclinical investigators to increase the reproducibility of animal study data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ilar Journal
Ilar Journal 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
>18 weeks
期刊介绍: The ILAR Journal is the peer-reviewed, theme-oriented publication of the Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (ILAR), which provides timely information for all who study, use, care for, and oversee the use of animals in research. The journal publishes original articles that review research on animals either as direct subjects or as surrogates for humans. According to policy, any previously unpublished animal research reported in the ILAR Journal will have been conducted according to the scientific, technical, and humanely appropriate guidelines current at the time the research was conducted in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals or other guidance provided by taxonomically-oriented professional societies (e.g., American Society of Mammalogy) as referenced in the Guide.
期刊最新文献
ILAR: A Retrospective and Prospective Look A Structured Approach to Optimizing Animal Model Selection for Human Translation: The Animal Model Quality Assessment. Livestock and Risk Group 4 Pathogens: Researching Zoonotic Threats to Public Health and Agriculture in Maximum Containment. Fit for Purpose Assessment: A New Direction for IACUCs. Animals as Beneficiaries of Biomedical Research Originally Intended for Humans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1