使用手洗模型直接和间接暴露于两种pH值明显不同的商业洗衣剂对敏感皮肤的临床皮肤温和度评估。

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED Journal of cosmetic science Pub Date : 2019-03-01
Susanna Brink, Y U Wang, Beatrice Blum, Mekhine Baccam, Alex Varbanov, Vince Boeh, Yuexi Wang, Jeremy Christman, Cynthia Elaine Cella, Mary B Johnson, Miranda A Farage
{"title":"使用手洗模型直接和间接暴露于两种pH值明显不同的商业洗衣剂对敏感皮肤的临床皮肤温和度评估。","authors":"Susanna Brink,&nbsp;Y U Wang,&nbsp;Beatrice Blum,&nbsp;Mekhine Baccam,&nbsp;Alex Varbanov,&nbsp;Vince Boeh,&nbsp;Yuexi Wang,&nbsp;Jeremy Christman,&nbsp;Cynthia Elaine Cella,&nbsp;Mary B Johnson,&nbsp;Miranda A Farage","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The skin mildness of two commercial laundry detergents designed for sensitive skin, Tide Free and Gentle<sup>®</sup> (TFG) versus All Free Clear<sup>®</sup> (AFC), was compared in clinical studies, and the role of marked product pH differences was assessed. Two double-blind randomized human studies were conducted. Study 1 was a 1-day repeat insult forearm test, in which four exposures to solutions of TFG or AFC were performed to mimic direct exposure to dilute detergent during hand-laundering. Corneometer, erythema and dryness grading, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), and skin surface pH evaluations were carried out. Study 2 was a 21-day arm patch test of fabrics washed with TFG or AFC to mimic indirect contact to skin of detergent residues, with erythema grading. Separately, pH and reserve alkalinity were determined for each detergent. In Study 1, TFG was significantly milder than AFC in all measures except TEWL (no significant difference). In Study 2, the detergents were approximately equivalent in erythema grading. Analysis showed AFC was substantially more alkaline (pH 10.8) than TFG (pH 7.9) with higher reserve alkalinity. TFG was significantly milder than AFC in Study 1, which may be due in part to the increased skin surface pH seen with direct exposure to AFC's high alkalinity.</p>","PeriodicalId":15523,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cosmetic science","volume":"70 2","pages":"89-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Skin Mildness Evaluations of Direct and Indirect Exposure to Two Commercial Laundry Detergents with Markedly Different pH Designed for Sensitive Skin Using a Hand-Laundering Model.\",\"authors\":\"Susanna Brink,&nbsp;Y U Wang,&nbsp;Beatrice Blum,&nbsp;Mekhine Baccam,&nbsp;Alex Varbanov,&nbsp;Vince Boeh,&nbsp;Yuexi Wang,&nbsp;Jeremy Christman,&nbsp;Cynthia Elaine Cella,&nbsp;Mary B Johnson,&nbsp;Miranda A Farage\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The skin mildness of two commercial laundry detergents designed for sensitive skin, Tide Free and Gentle<sup>®</sup> (TFG) versus All Free Clear<sup>®</sup> (AFC), was compared in clinical studies, and the role of marked product pH differences was assessed. Two double-blind randomized human studies were conducted. Study 1 was a 1-day repeat insult forearm test, in which four exposures to solutions of TFG or AFC were performed to mimic direct exposure to dilute detergent during hand-laundering. Corneometer, erythema and dryness grading, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), and skin surface pH evaluations were carried out. Study 2 was a 21-day arm patch test of fabrics washed with TFG or AFC to mimic indirect contact to skin of detergent residues, with erythema grading. Separately, pH and reserve alkalinity were determined for each detergent. In Study 1, TFG was significantly milder than AFC in all measures except TEWL (no significant difference). In Study 2, the detergents were approximately equivalent in erythema grading. Analysis showed AFC was substantially more alkaline (pH 10.8) than TFG (pH 7.9) with higher reserve alkalinity. TFG was significantly milder than AFC in Study 1, which may be due in part to the increased skin surface pH seen with direct exposure to AFC's high alkalinity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cosmetic science\",\"volume\":\"70 2\",\"pages\":\"89-105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cosmetic science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cosmetic science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在临床研究中,比较了两种针对敏感皮肤设计的商用洗衣液——Tide Free and Gentle®(TFG)和All Free Clear®(AFC)的皮肤温和性,并评估了产品pH值差异的作用。进行了两项双盲随机人体研究。研究1是为期1天的重复侮辱前臂试验,其中四次暴露于TFG或AFC溶液中,以模拟在洗手过程中直接暴露于稀释洗涤剂。进行角质计、红斑和干燥分级、经皮失水(TEWL)和皮肤表面pH值评估。研究2是对用TFG或AFC洗涤的织物进行为期21天的手臂贴片试验,以模拟洗涤剂残留物与皮肤的间接接触,并对红斑进行分级。分别测定了每种洗涤剂的pH值和储备碱度。在研究1中,除TEWL外,TFG在所有测量中均明显轻于AFC(无显著差异)。在研究2中,去污剂在红斑分级上大致相同。分析表明,AFC碱性(pH值10.8)明显高于TFG (pH值7.9),且储备碱度更高。在研究1中,TFG明显比AFC温和,这可能部分是由于直接暴露于AFC的高碱度导致皮肤表面pH值增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical Skin Mildness Evaluations of Direct and Indirect Exposure to Two Commercial Laundry Detergents with Markedly Different pH Designed for Sensitive Skin Using a Hand-Laundering Model.

The skin mildness of two commercial laundry detergents designed for sensitive skin, Tide Free and Gentle® (TFG) versus All Free Clear® (AFC), was compared in clinical studies, and the role of marked product pH differences was assessed. Two double-blind randomized human studies were conducted. Study 1 was a 1-day repeat insult forearm test, in which four exposures to solutions of TFG or AFC were performed to mimic direct exposure to dilute detergent during hand-laundering. Corneometer, erythema and dryness grading, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), and skin surface pH evaluations were carried out. Study 2 was a 21-day arm patch test of fabrics washed with TFG or AFC to mimic indirect contact to skin of detergent residues, with erythema grading. Separately, pH and reserve alkalinity were determined for each detergent. In Study 1, TFG was significantly milder than AFC in all measures except TEWL (no significant difference). In Study 2, the detergents were approximately equivalent in erythema grading. Analysis showed AFC was substantially more alkaline (pH 10.8) than TFG (pH 7.9) with higher reserve alkalinity. TFG was significantly milder than AFC in Study 1, which may be due in part to the increased skin surface pH seen with direct exposure to AFC's high alkalinity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of cosmetic science
Journal of cosmetic science 工程技术-皮肤病学
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The JOURNAL OF COSMETIC SCIENCE (JCS) publishes papers concerned with cosmetics, cosmetic products, fragrances, their formulation and their effects in skin care or in overall consumer well-being, as well as papers relating to the sciences underlying cosmetics, such as human skin physiology, color physics, physical chemistry of colloids and emulsions, or psychological effects of olfaction in humans. Papers of interest to the cosmetic industry and to the understanding of the cosmetic markets are also welcome for publication.
期刊最新文献
Skin Permeation of Hazardous Compounds of Tobacco Smoke in Presence of Antipollution Cosmetics. Rheology of Cosmetic Products: Surfactant Mesophases, Foams and Emulsions. Application of Biosurfactants and Biopolymers in Sustainable Cosmetic Formulation Design. Detection and Analysis of Ceramide in Skin and Blood in a Healthy Chinese Population. Antibacterial Activity of Senkyunolide A Isolated from Cnidium Officinale Extract.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1