Susanna Brink, Y U Wang, Beatrice Blum, Mekhine Baccam, Alex Varbanov, Vince Boeh, Yuexi Wang, Jeremy Christman, Cynthia Elaine Cella, Mary B Johnson, Miranda A Farage
{"title":"使用手洗模型直接和间接暴露于两种pH值明显不同的商业洗衣剂对敏感皮肤的临床皮肤温和度评估。","authors":"Susanna Brink, Y U Wang, Beatrice Blum, Mekhine Baccam, Alex Varbanov, Vince Boeh, Yuexi Wang, Jeremy Christman, Cynthia Elaine Cella, Mary B Johnson, Miranda A Farage","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The skin mildness of two commercial laundry detergents designed for sensitive skin, Tide Free and Gentle<sup>®</sup> (TFG) versus All Free Clear<sup>®</sup> (AFC), was compared in clinical studies, and the role of marked product pH differences was assessed. Two double-blind randomized human studies were conducted. Study 1 was a 1-day repeat insult forearm test, in which four exposures to solutions of TFG or AFC were performed to mimic direct exposure to dilute detergent during hand-laundering. Corneometer, erythema and dryness grading, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), and skin surface pH evaluations were carried out. Study 2 was a 21-day arm patch test of fabrics washed with TFG or AFC to mimic indirect contact to skin of detergent residues, with erythema grading. Separately, pH and reserve alkalinity were determined for each detergent. In Study 1, TFG was significantly milder than AFC in all measures except TEWL (no significant difference). In Study 2, the detergents were approximately equivalent in erythema grading. Analysis showed AFC was substantially more alkaline (pH 10.8) than TFG (pH 7.9) with higher reserve alkalinity. TFG was significantly milder than AFC in Study 1, which may be due in part to the increased skin surface pH seen with direct exposure to AFC's high alkalinity.</p>","PeriodicalId":15523,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cosmetic science","volume":"70 2","pages":"89-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Skin Mildness Evaluations of Direct and Indirect Exposure to Two Commercial Laundry Detergents with Markedly Different pH Designed for Sensitive Skin Using a Hand-Laundering Model.\",\"authors\":\"Susanna Brink, Y U Wang, Beatrice Blum, Mekhine Baccam, Alex Varbanov, Vince Boeh, Yuexi Wang, Jeremy Christman, Cynthia Elaine Cella, Mary B Johnson, Miranda A Farage\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The skin mildness of two commercial laundry detergents designed for sensitive skin, Tide Free and Gentle<sup>®</sup> (TFG) versus All Free Clear<sup>®</sup> (AFC), was compared in clinical studies, and the role of marked product pH differences was assessed. Two double-blind randomized human studies were conducted. Study 1 was a 1-day repeat insult forearm test, in which four exposures to solutions of TFG or AFC were performed to mimic direct exposure to dilute detergent during hand-laundering. Corneometer, erythema and dryness grading, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), and skin surface pH evaluations were carried out. Study 2 was a 21-day arm patch test of fabrics washed with TFG or AFC to mimic indirect contact to skin of detergent residues, with erythema grading. Separately, pH and reserve alkalinity were determined for each detergent. In Study 1, TFG was significantly milder than AFC in all measures except TEWL (no significant difference). In Study 2, the detergents were approximately equivalent in erythema grading. Analysis showed AFC was substantially more alkaline (pH 10.8) than TFG (pH 7.9) with higher reserve alkalinity. TFG was significantly milder than AFC in Study 1, which may be due in part to the increased skin surface pH seen with direct exposure to AFC's high alkalinity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cosmetic science\",\"volume\":\"70 2\",\"pages\":\"89-105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cosmetic science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cosmetic science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在临床研究中,比较了两种针对敏感皮肤设计的商用洗衣液——Tide Free and Gentle®(TFG)和All Free Clear®(AFC)的皮肤温和性,并评估了产品pH值差异的作用。进行了两项双盲随机人体研究。研究1是为期1天的重复侮辱前臂试验,其中四次暴露于TFG或AFC溶液中,以模拟在洗手过程中直接暴露于稀释洗涤剂。进行角质计、红斑和干燥分级、经皮失水(TEWL)和皮肤表面pH值评估。研究2是对用TFG或AFC洗涤的织物进行为期21天的手臂贴片试验,以模拟洗涤剂残留物与皮肤的间接接触,并对红斑进行分级。分别测定了每种洗涤剂的pH值和储备碱度。在研究1中,除TEWL外,TFG在所有测量中均明显轻于AFC(无显著差异)。在研究2中,去污剂在红斑分级上大致相同。分析表明,AFC碱性(pH值10.8)明显高于TFG (pH值7.9),且储备碱度更高。在研究1中,TFG明显比AFC温和,这可能部分是由于直接暴露于AFC的高碱度导致皮肤表面pH值增加。
Clinical Skin Mildness Evaluations of Direct and Indirect Exposure to Two Commercial Laundry Detergents with Markedly Different pH Designed for Sensitive Skin Using a Hand-Laundering Model.
The skin mildness of two commercial laundry detergents designed for sensitive skin, Tide Free and Gentle® (TFG) versus All Free Clear® (AFC), was compared in clinical studies, and the role of marked product pH differences was assessed. Two double-blind randomized human studies were conducted. Study 1 was a 1-day repeat insult forearm test, in which four exposures to solutions of TFG or AFC were performed to mimic direct exposure to dilute detergent during hand-laundering. Corneometer, erythema and dryness grading, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), and skin surface pH evaluations were carried out. Study 2 was a 21-day arm patch test of fabrics washed with TFG or AFC to mimic indirect contact to skin of detergent residues, with erythema grading. Separately, pH and reserve alkalinity were determined for each detergent. In Study 1, TFG was significantly milder than AFC in all measures except TEWL (no significant difference). In Study 2, the detergents were approximately equivalent in erythema grading. Analysis showed AFC was substantially more alkaline (pH 10.8) than TFG (pH 7.9) with higher reserve alkalinity. TFG was significantly milder than AFC in Study 1, which may be due in part to the increased skin surface pH seen with direct exposure to AFC's high alkalinity.
期刊介绍:
The JOURNAL OF COSMETIC SCIENCE (JCS) publishes papers concerned with cosmetics, cosmetic products, fragrances, their formulation and their effects in skin care or in overall consumer well-being, as well as papers relating to the sciences underlying cosmetics, such as human skin physiology, color physics, physical chemistry of colloids and emulsions, or psychological effects of olfaction in humans. Papers of interest to the cosmetic industry and to the understanding of the cosmetic markets are also welcome for publication.