Troy D Hubbard, Jui-Hua Hsieh, Cynthia V Rider, Nisha S Sipes, Alexander Sedykh, Bradley J Collins, Scott S Auerbach, Menghang Xia, Ruili Huang, Nigel J Walker, Michael J DeVito
{"title":"使用 Tox21 高通量筛选测定法评估植物补充剂和膳食补充剂。","authors":"Troy D Hubbard, Jui-Hua Hsieh, Cynthia V Rider, Nisha S Sipes, Alexander Sedykh, Bradley J Collins, Scott S Auerbach, Menghang Xia, Ruili Huang, Nigel J Walker, Michael J DeVito","doi":"10.1089/aivt.2018.0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Recent nationwide surveys found that natural products, including botanical dietary supplements, are used by ∼18% of adults. In many cases, there is a paucity of toxicological data available for these substances to allow for confident evaluations of product safety. The National Toxicology Program (NTP) has received numerous nominations from the public and federal agencies to study the toxicological effects of botanical dietary supplements. The NTP sought to evaluate the utility of <i>in vitro</i> quantitative high-throughput screening (qHTS) assays for toxicological assessment of botanical and dietary supplements. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> In brief, concentration-response assessments of 90 test substances, including 13 distinct botanical species, and individual purported active constituents were evaluated using a subset of the Tox21 qHTS testing panel. The screen included 20 different endpoints that covered a broad range of biologically relevant signaling pathways to detect test article effects upon endocrine activity, nuclear receptor signaling, stress response signaling, genotoxicity, and cell death signaling. <b><i>Results and Discussion:</i></b> Botanical dietary supplement extracts induced measurable and diverse activity. Elevated biological activity profiles were observed following treatments with individual chemical constituents relative to their associated botanical extract. The overall distribution of activity was comparable to activities exhibited by compounds present in the Tox21 10K chemical library. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Botanical supplements did not exhibit minimal or idiosyncratic activities that would preclude the use of qHTS platforms as a feasible method to screen this class of compounds. However, there are still many considerations and further development required when attempting to use <i>in vitro</i> qHTS methods to characterize the safety profile of botanical/dietary supplements.</p>","PeriodicalId":37448,"journal":{"name":"Applied In Vitro Toxicology","volume":"5 1","pages":"10-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6442399/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Tox21 High-Throughput Screening Assays for the Evaluation of Botanical and Dietary Supplements.\",\"authors\":\"Troy D Hubbard, Jui-Hua Hsieh, Cynthia V Rider, Nisha S Sipes, Alexander Sedykh, Bradley J Collins, Scott S Auerbach, Menghang Xia, Ruili Huang, Nigel J Walker, Michael J DeVito\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/aivt.2018.0020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Recent nationwide surveys found that natural products, including botanical dietary supplements, are used by ∼18% of adults. In many cases, there is a paucity of toxicological data available for these substances to allow for confident evaluations of product safety. The National Toxicology Program (NTP) has received numerous nominations from the public and federal agencies to study the toxicological effects of botanical dietary supplements. The NTP sought to evaluate the utility of <i>in vitro</i> quantitative high-throughput screening (qHTS) assays for toxicological assessment of botanical and dietary supplements. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> In brief, concentration-response assessments of 90 test substances, including 13 distinct botanical species, and individual purported active constituents were evaluated using a subset of the Tox21 qHTS testing panel. The screen included 20 different endpoints that covered a broad range of biologically relevant signaling pathways to detect test article effects upon endocrine activity, nuclear receptor signaling, stress response signaling, genotoxicity, and cell death signaling. <b><i>Results and Discussion:</i></b> Botanical dietary supplement extracts induced measurable and diverse activity. Elevated biological activity profiles were observed following treatments with individual chemical constituents relative to their associated botanical extract. The overall distribution of activity was comparable to activities exhibited by compounds present in the Tox21 10K chemical library. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Botanical supplements did not exhibit minimal or idiosyncratic activities that would preclude the use of qHTS platforms as a feasible method to screen this class of compounds. However, there are still many considerations and further development required when attempting to use <i>in vitro</i> qHTS methods to characterize the safety profile of botanical/dietary supplements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied In Vitro Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"10-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6442399/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied In Vitro Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/aivt.2018.0020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/3/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied In Vitro Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/aivt.2018.0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/3/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
Using Tox21 High-Throughput Screening Assays for the Evaluation of Botanical and Dietary Supplements.
Introduction: Recent nationwide surveys found that natural products, including botanical dietary supplements, are used by ∼18% of adults. In many cases, there is a paucity of toxicological data available for these substances to allow for confident evaluations of product safety. The National Toxicology Program (NTP) has received numerous nominations from the public and federal agencies to study the toxicological effects of botanical dietary supplements. The NTP sought to evaluate the utility of in vitro quantitative high-throughput screening (qHTS) assays for toxicological assessment of botanical and dietary supplements. Materials and Methods: In brief, concentration-response assessments of 90 test substances, including 13 distinct botanical species, and individual purported active constituents were evaluated using a subset of the Tox21 qHTS testing panel. The screen included 20 different endpoints that covered a broad range of biologically relevant signaling pathways to detect test article effects upon endocrine activity, nuclear receptor signaling, stress response signaling, genotoxicity, and cell death signaling. Results and Discussion: Botanical dietary supplement extracts induced measurable and diverse activity. Elevated biological activity profiles were observed following treatments with individual chemical constituents relative to their associated botanical extract. The overall distribution of activity was comparable to activities exhibited by compounds present in the Tox21 10K chemical library. Conclusion: Botanical supplements did not exhibit minimal or idiosyncratic activities that would preclude the use of qHTS platforms as a feasible method to screen this class of compounds. However, there are still many considerations and further development required when attempting to use in vitro qHTS methods to characterize the safety profile of botanical/dietary supplements.
期刊介绍:
Applied In Vitro Toxicology is a peer-reviewed journal providing the latest research on the application of alternative in vitro testing methods for predicting adverse effects in the pharmaceutical, chemical, and personal care industries. This Journal aims to address important issues facing the various chemical industries, including regulatory requirements; the reduction, refinement, and replacement of animal testing; new screening methods; evaluation of new cell and tissue models; and the most appropriate methods for assessing safety and satisfying regulatory demands. The Journal also delivers the latest views and opinions of developers of new models, end users of the models, academic laboratories that are inventing new tools, and regulatory agencies in the United States, Europe, Latin America, Australia and Asia. Applied In Vitro Toxicology is the journal that scientists involved with hazard identification and risk assessment will read to understand how new and existing in vitro methods are applied, and the questions for which these models provide answers. Applied In Vitro Toxicology coverage includes: -Applied in vitro toxicology industry standards -New technologies developed for applied in vitro toxicology -Data acquisition, cleaning, distribution, and best practices -Data protection, privacy, and policy -Business interests from research to product -The changing role of in vitro toxicology -Visualization and design principles of applied in vitro toxicology infrastructures -Physical interfaces and robotics -Opportunities around applied in vitro toxicology