Divya Tiwari, Michael Vassallo, Charlotte Owen, Richard Renaut, Stephen Allen
{"title":"管理住院的老年患者:对资源转移到“前门”的结果的研究。","authors":"Divya Tiwari, Michael Vassallo, Charlotte Owen, Richard Renaut, Stephen Allen","doi":"10.7861/futurehosp.3-3-174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We performed a retrospective cohort comparison study to look at the processes for concentrating geriatric resources in the acute admissions area in a general hospital in the UK and compare key outcomes. The number of consultant geriatricians and other staff working at the 'front door' - acute medical unit (AMU) and short stay ward (SSW) - was increased. We compared 'front door' outcomes with whole department outcomes in 2013 and 2014, looking at the proportion of patients discharged within 3 and 5 days of admission, the proportion discharged from the 'front door', mean lengths of stay (LOS) and readmissions within 28 days of discharge. There were 1,147 and 1,381 discharge episodes in 2013 and 2014, respectively. 'Front door' discharges rose from 36% to 46% (p<0.001) between 2013 and 2014, and the proportion of 'front door' discharges occurring within 3 days rose from 56% (2013) to 68% (2014), compared with 35% and 33% for the department as a whole (p=0.006). The mean LOS at the 'front door' fell from 6.1 to 3.8 days (p=0.007). Readmissions from 'front door' discharges rose from 12% to 14% (p=0.004). The change in the configuration of the acute geriatric service was associated with more favourable discharge performance outcomes at the 'front door' but modest improvements in discharge performance for the geriatric service as a whole.</p>","PeriodicalId":92635,"journal":{"name":"Future hospital journal","volume":"3 3","pages":"174-177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6465802/pdf/futurehosp-3-3-174.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Managing older medical patients in hospital: a study of the outcomes from a shift of resources to the 'front door'.\",\"authors\":\"Divya Tiwari, Michael Vassallo, Charlotte Owen, Richard Renaut, Stephen Allen\",\"doi\":\"10.7861/futurehosp.3-3-174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We performed a retrospective cohort comparison study to look at the processes for concentrating geriatric resources in the acute admissions area in a general hospital in the UK and compare key outcomes. The number of consultant geriatricians and other staff working at the 'front door' - acute medical unit (AMU) and short stay ward (SSW) - was increased. We compared 'front door' outcomes with whole department outcomes in 2013 and 2014, looking at the proportion of patients discharged within 3 and 5 days of admission, the proportion discharged from the 'front door', mean lengths of stay (LOS) and readmissions within 28 days of discharge. There were 1,147 and 1,381 discharge episodes in 2013 and 2014, respectively. 'Front door' discharges rose from 36% to 46% (p<0.001) between 2013 and 2014, and the proportion of 'front door' discharges occurring within 3 days rose from 56% (2013) to 68% (2014), compared with 35% and 33% for the department as a whole (p=0.006). The mean LOS at the 'front door' fell from 6.1 to 3.8 days (p=0.007). Readmissions from 'front door' discharges rose from 12% to 14% (p=0.004). The change in the configuration of the acute geriatric service was associated with more favourable discharge performance outcomes at the 'front door' but modest improvements in discharge performance for the geriatric service as a whole.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":92635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future hospital journal\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"174-177\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6465802/pdf/futurehosp-3-3-174.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future hospital journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehosp.3-3-174\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future hospital journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehosp.3-3-174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Managing older medical patients in hospital: a study of the outcomes from a shift of resources to the 'front door'.
We performed a retrospective cohort comparison study to look at the processes for concentrating geriatric resources in the acute admissions area in a general hospital in the UK and compare key outcomes. The number of consultant geriatricians and other staff working at the 'front door' - acute medical unit (AMU) and short stay ward (SSW) - was increased. We compared 'front door' outcomes with whole department outcomes in 2013 and 2014, looking at the proportion of patients discharged within 3 and 5 days of admission, the proportion discharged from the 'front door', mean lengths of stay (LOS) and readmissions within 28 days of discharge. There were 1,147 and 1,381 discharge episodes in 2013 and 2014, respectively. 'Front door' discharges rose from 36% to 46% (p<0.001) between 2013 and 2014, and the proportion of 'front door' discharges occurring within 3 days rose from 56% (2013) to 68% (2014), compared with 35% and 33% for the department as a whole (p=0.006). The mean LOS at the 'front door' fell from 6.1 to 3.8 days (p=0.007). Readmissions from 'front door' discharges rose from 12% to 14% (p=0.004). The change in the configuration of the acute geriatric service was associated with more favourable discharge performance outcomes at the 'front door' but modest improvements in discharge performance for the geriatric service as a whole.