肾移植术后10年内移植物衰竭风险个体化预测的预后工具。

IF 0.9 Q3 SURGERY Journal of Transplantation Pub Date : 2019-04-08 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2019/7245142
Danko Stamenic, Annick Rousseau, Marie Essig, Philippe Gatault, Mathias Buchler, Matthieu Filloux, Pierre Marquet, Aurélie Prémaud
{"title":"肾移植术后10年内移植物衰竭风险个体化预测的预后工具。","authors":"Danko Stamenic,&nbsp;Annick Rousseau,&nbsp;Marie Essig,&nbsp;Philippe Gatault,&nbsp;Mathias Buchler,&nbsp;Matthieu Filloux,&nbsp;Pierre Marquet,&nbsp;Aurélie Prémaud","doi":"10.1155/2019/7245142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Identification of patients at risk of kidney graft loss relies on early individual prediction of graft failure. Data from 616 kidney transplant recipients with a follow-up of at least one year were retrospectively studied. A joint latent class model investigating the impact of serum creatinine (Scr) time-trajectories and onset of <i>de novo</i> donor-specific anti-HLA antibody (<i>dn</i>DSA) on graft survival was developed. The capacity of the model to calculate individual predicted probabilities of graft failure over time was evaluated in 80 independent patients. The model classified the patients in three latent classes with significantly different Scr time profiles and different graft survivals. Donor age contributed to explaining latent class membership. In addition to the SCr classes, the other variables retained in the survival model were proteinuria measured one-year after transplantation (HR=2.4, p=0.01), pretransplant non-donor-specific antibodies (HR=3.3, p<0.001), and <i>dn</i>DSA in patient who experienced acute rejection (HR=15.9, p=0.02). In the validation dataset, individual predictions of graft failure risk provided good predictive performances (sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of graft failure prediction at ten years were 77.7%, 95.8%, and 85%, resp.) for the 60 patients who had not developed <i>dn</i>DSA. For patients with <i>dn</i>DSA individual risk of graft failure was not predicted with a so good performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":45795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2019/7245142","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Prognostic Tool for Individualized Prediction of Graft Failure Risk within Ten Years after Kidney Transplantation.\",\"authors\":\"Danko Stamenic,&nbsp;Annick Rousseau,&nbsp;Marie Essig,&nbsp;Philippe Gatault,&nbsp;Mathias Buchler,&nbsp;Matthieu Filloux,&nbsp;Pierre Marquet,&nbsp;Aurélie Prémaud\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2019/7245142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Identification of patients at risk of kidney graft loss relies on early individual prediction of graft failure. Data from 616 kidney transplant recipients with a follow-up of at least one year were retrospectively studied. A joint latent class model investigating the impact of serum creatinine (Scr) time-trajectories and onset of <i>de novo</i> donor-specific anti-HLA antibody (<i>dn</i>DSA) on graft survival was developed. The capacity of the model to calculate individual predicted probabilities of graft failure over time was evaluated in 80 independent patients. The model classified the patients in three latent classes with significantly different Scr time profiles and different graft survivals. Donor age contributed to explaining latent class membership. In addition to the SCr classes, the other variables retained in the survival model were proteinuria measured one-year after transplantation (HR=2.4, p=0.01), pretransplant non-donor-specific antibodies (HR=3.3, p<0.001), and <i>dn</i>DSA in patient who experienced acute rejection (HR=15.9, p=0.02). In the validation dataset, individual predictions of graft failure risk provided good predictive performances (sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of graft failure prediction at ten years were 77.7%, 95.8%, and 85%, resp.) for the 60 patients who had not developed <i>dn</i>DSA. For patients with <i>dn</i>DSA individual risk of graft failure was not predicted with a so good performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Transplantation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2019/7245142\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7245142\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7245142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

识别有肾移植损失风险的患者依赖于对移植衰竭的早期个体预测。回顾性研究了616例肾移植受者至少1年的随访数据。建立了一个联合潜在类模型,研究血清肌酐(Scr)时间轨迹和新生供体特异性hla抗体(dnDSA)的发生对移植物存活的影响。在80名独立患者中评估了该模型计算个体预测移植物衰竭概率的能力。该模型将患者分为三种潜在类型,具有显著不同的Scr时间分布和不同的移植物存活率。捐赠者的年龄有助于解释潜在的阶级成员。除了SCr分类,生存模型中保留的其他变量包括移植后一年的蛋白尿(HR=2.4, p=0.01),移植前非供体特异性抗体(HR=3.3,急性排斥反应患者的pdnDSA (HR=15.9, p=0.02)。在验证数据集中,对于60名未发生dnDSA的患者,移植衰竭风险的个体预测提供了良好的预测性能(10年移植衰竭预测的敏感性、特异性和总体准确性分别为77.7%、95.8%和85%)。对于dnDSA患者,个体移植失败的风险没有预测到,但表现很好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Prognostic Tool for Individualized Prediction of Graft Failure Risk within Ten Years after Kidney Transplantation.

Identification of patients at risk of kidney graft loss relies on early individual prediction of graft failure. Data from 616 kidney transplant recipients with a follow-up of at least one year were retrospectively studied. A joint latent class model investigating the impact of serum creatinine (Scr) time-trajectories and onset of de novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibody (dnDSA) on graft survival was developed. The capacity of the model to calculate individual predicted probabilities of graft failure over time was evaluated in 80 independent patients. The model classified the patients in three latent classes with significantly different Scr time profiles and different graft survivals. Donor age contributed to explaining latent class membership. In addition to the SCr classes, the other variables retained in the survival model were proteinuria measured one-year after transplantation (HR=2.4, p=0.01), pretransplant non-donor-specific antibodies (HR=3.3, p<0.001), and dnDSA in patient who experienced acute rejection (HR=15.9, p=0.02). In the validation dataset, individual predictions of graft failure risk provided good predictive performances (sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of graft failure prediction at ten years were 77.7%, 95.8%, and 85%, resp.) for the 60 patients who had not developed dnDSA. For patients with dnDSA individual risk of graft failure was not predicted with a so good performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
4.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pneumatosis Intestinalis and Pneumoperitoneum After Lung Transplantation: Single-Center Experience and Systematic Review. Hepatic Duct Division During Robotic Living Donor Hepatectomy: A Comparison Between the Novel Triple C (Clip-Clamp-Cut) and the Cut-Suture Techniques. Psychosocial Trauma History Negatively Impacts Liver Transplant Access in Women with Chronic Liver Disease. Long-Term Outcomes of Recipients of Liver Transplants from Living Donors Treated with a Very Low-Calorie Diet. Addressing Kidney Transplant Shortage: The Potential of Kidney Paired Exchanges in Jordan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1