MALDI生物分型对评分值≧2.000鉴定结果的信度:包括哪些多微生物种

Hiroki Hanaiwa, Taeko Narita, Kyohei Kato, Atsumi Yokoo, Kazuhiro Shinto, Yumiko Funashima, Kenichi Sato, Zenzo Nagasawa, Tsukuru Umemura
{"title":"MALDI生物分型对评分值≧2.000鉴定结果的信度:包括哪些多微生物种","authors":"Hiroki Hanaiwa,&nbsp;Taeko Narita,&nbsp;Kyohei Kato,&nbsp;Atsumi Yokoo,&nbsp;Kazuhiro Shinto,&nbsp;Yumiko Funashima,&nbsp;Kenichi Sato,&nbsp;Zenzo Nagasawa,&nbsp;Tsukuru Umemura","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Identification of bacteria by using MALDI Biotyper is relevant at the species category if Score Value (SV) is not less than 2.000. However, in practical examination, the analysis by MALDI Biotyper frequently produces the multiple candidate bacterial species with SV ≥2.000. In this study, we analyzed the ratio of multiple results among 10,081 specimens and identified the species of bacteria with high frequency of multiple results. Our analysis indicated that 8,129 strains out of 10,081 strains examined from July 2015 to July 2017, showed multiple identification results with MALDI Biotyper, and that multiple result was obtained in 4.9% of gram positive cocci analysis, 5.8% of gram positive rods, 25.4% of gram negative cocci, 16% of gram negative rod, none of fungus. In particular, MALDI Biotyper analysis of <i>Enterobacter</i> spp. (<i>E. cloacae</i>, <i>E. asburiae</i>, <i>E. kobei</i>, etc.), <i>Acinetobacter</i> spp. (<i>A. baumannii</i>, <i>A. nosocomialis</i>, <i>A. pittii</i> etc.), <i>Neisseria</i> spp. (<i>N. flavescens</i>, <i>N. perflava</i> etc.) had high ratios of multiple results. Our data suggests that genetic homology among bacteria results in multiple results of bacteria identification. The mass spectrometer method is the rapid test for bacteria identification. However, for obtaining higher specificity, it is required to combine with other methods. Furthermore, systematic annotation of bacteria is highly recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"29 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Reliability of the Identification Result of Score Value ≧2.000 with the MALDI Biotyper: What Kind of Polymicrobial Species Are Included].\",\"authors\":\"Hiroki Hanaiwa,&nbsp;Taeko Narita,&nbsp;Kyohei Kato,&nbsp;Atsumi Yokoo,&nbsp;Kazuhiro Shinto,&nbsp;Yumiko Funashima,&nbsp;Kenichi Sato,&nbsp;Zenzo Nagasawa,&nbsp;Tsukuru Umemura\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Identification of bacteria by using MALDI Biotyper is relevant at the species category if Score Value (SV) is not less than 2.000. However, in practical examination, the analysis by MALDI Biotyper frequently produces the multiple candidate bacterial species with SV ≥2.000. In this study, we analyzed the ratio of multiple results among 10,081 specimens and identified the species of bacteria with high frequency of multiple results. Our analysis indicated that 8,129 strains out of 10,081 strains examined from July 2015 to July 2017, showed multiple identification results with MALDI Biotyper, and that multiple result was obtained in 4.9% of gram positive cocci analysis, 5.8% of gram positive rods, 25.4% of gram negative cocci, 16% of gram negative rod, none of fungus. In particular, MALDI Biotyper analysis of <i>Enterobacter</i> spp. (<i>E. cloacae</i>, <i>E. asburiae</i>, <i>E. kobei</i>, etc.), <i>Acinetobacter</i> spp. (<i>A. baumannii</i>, <i>A. nosocomialis</i>, <i>A. pittii</i> etc.), <i>Neisseria</i> spp. (<i>N. flavescens</i>, <i>N. perflava</i> etc.) had high ratios of multiple results. Our data suggests that genetic homology among bacteria results in multiple results of bacteria identification. The mass spectrometer method is the rapid test for bacteria identification. However, for obtaining higher specificity, it is required to combine with other methods. Furthermore, systematic annotation of bacteria is highly recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如果得分值(SV)不小于2.000,则MALDI Biotyper在菌种分类上具有相关性。然而,在实际检验中,MALDI Biotyper分析经常产生SV≥2.000的多个候选菌种。在本研究中,我们对10081份标本中多重结果的比例进行了分析,确定了多重结果出现频率较高的细菌种类。分析结果显示,2015年7月至2017年7月检测的10081株菌株中,有8129株MALDI Biotyper出现多重鉴定结果,其中革兰氏阳性球菌分析为4.9%,革兰氏阳性杆状菌分析为5.8%,革兰氏阴性球菌分析为25.4%,革兰氏阴性杆状菌分析为16%,真菌分析为零。特别是对肠杆菌(阴沟肠杆菌、asburiae肠杆菌、kobei肠杆菌等)、不动杆菌(鲍曼不动杆菌、医院不动杆菌、pittii不动杆菌等)、奈瑟菌(黄奈瑟菌、perflava奈瑟菌等)的MALDI生物分型分析具有较高的多重结果比例。我们的数据表明,细菌之间的基因同源性导致了细菌鉴定的多重结果。质谱法是细菌鉴定的快速方法。然而,为了获得更高的特异性,需要与其他方法联合使用。此外,强烈建议对细菌进行系统注释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Reliability of the Identification Result of Score Value ≧2.000 with the MALDI Biotyper: What Kind of Polymicrobial Species Are Included].

Identification of bacteria by using MALDI Biotyper is relevant at the species category if Score Value (SV) is not less than 2.000. However, in practical examination, the analysis by MALDI Biotyper frequently produces the multiple candidate bacterial species with SV ≥2.000. In this study, we analyzed the ratio of multiple results among 10,081 specimens and identified the species of bacteria with high frequency of multiple results. Our analysis indicated that 8,129 strains out of 10,081 strains examined from July 2015 to July 2017, showed multiple identification results with MALDI Biotyper, and that multiple result was obtained in 4.9% of gram positive cocci analysis, 5.8% of gram positive rods, 25.4% of gram negative cocci, 16% of gram negative rod, none of fungus. In particular, MALDI Biotyper analysis of Enterobacter spp. (E. cloacae, E. asburiae, E. kobei, etc.), Acinetobacter spp. (A. baumannii, A. nosocomialis, A. pittii etc.), Neisseria spp. (N. flavescens, N. perflava etc.) had high ratios of multiple results. Our data suggests that genetic homology among bacteria results in multiple results of bacteria identification. The mass spectrometer method is the rapid test for bacteria identification. However, for obtaining higher specificity, it is required to combine with other methods. Furthermore, systematic annotation of bacteria is highly recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Japanese Case of COVID-19 Caused by Omicron Strain with Y453F Substitution. [Evaluation of Methicillin Resistance Determination Time for MRSA Using Fully Automated Rapid Identification Susceptibility testing system RAISAS S4]. [Evaluation of the Clinical Validity of the Clostridioides difficile Nucleic Acid Detection Kit "Smart Gene® CD ToxinB"]. [Relationship between Serotypes and Biotypes of Yersinia enterocolitica and the Names of Identified Bacteria in the Microbial Identification and Susceptibility Testing Devices]. Comparison of Microorganism Detection, Time to Positivity, and Time-Dependent Shift in Viable Bacterial Count from VersaTREK and BacT/ALERT 3D Blood Culture Systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1