体外到体内外推的观点。

Q2 Health Professions Applied In Vitro Toxicology Pub Date : 2018-12-01 Epub Date: 2018-12-08 DOI:10.1089/aivt.2016.0026
Thomas Hartung
{"title":"体外到体内外推的观点。","authors":"Thomas Hartung","doi":"10.1089/aivt.2016.0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quantitative <i>in vitro</i> to <i>in vivo</i> extrapolation (QIVIVE) is broadly considered a prerequisite bridge from <i>in vitro</i> findings to a dose paradigm. Quality and relevance of cell systems are the first prerequisite for QIVIVE. Information-rich and mechanistic endpoints (biomarkers) improve extrapolations, but a sophisticated endpoint does not make a bad cell model a good one. The next need is reverse toxicokinetics (TK), which estimates the dose necessary to reach a tissue concentration that is active <i>in vitro</i>. The Johns Hopkins Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT) has created a roadmap for animal-free systemic toxicity testing, in which the needs and opportunities for TK are elaborated, in the context of different systemic toxicities. The report was discussed at two stakeholder forums in Brussels in 2012 and in Washington in 2013; the key recommendations are summarized herein. Contrary to common belief and the Paracelsus paradigm of everything is toxic, the majority of industrial chemicals do not exhibit toxicity. Strengthening the credibility of negative results of alternative approaches for hazard identification, therefore, avoids the need for QIVIVE. Here, especially the combination of methods in integrated testing strategies is most promising. Two further but very different approaches aim to overcome the problem of modeling <i>in vivo</i> complexity: The <i>human-on-a-chip</i> movement aims to reproduce large parts of living organism's complexity via microphysiological systems, that is, organ equivalents combined by microfluidics. At the same time, the Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century (Tox-21c) movement aims for mechanistic approaches (adverse outcome pathways as promoted by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) or pathways of toxicity in the Human Toxome Project) for high-throughput screening, biological phenotyping, and ultimately a systems toxicology approach through integration with computer modeling. These 21st century approaches also require 21st century validation, for example, by evidence-based toxicology. Ultimately, QIVIVE is a prerequisite for extrapolating Tox-21c such approaches to human risk assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":37448,"journal":{"name":"Applied In Vitro Toxicology","volume":"4 4","pages":"305-316"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/aivt.2016.0026","citationCount":"48","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perspectives on <i>In Vitro</i> to <i>In Vivo</i> Extrapolations.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Hartung\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/aivt.2016.0026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Quantitative <i>in vitro</i> to <i>in vivo</i> extrapolation (QIVIVE) is broadly considered a prerequisite bridge from <i>in vitro</i> findings to a dose paradigm. Quality and relevance of cell systems are the first prerequisite for QIVIVE. Information-rich and mechanistic endpoints (biomarkers) improve extrapolations, but a sophisticated endpoint does not make a bad cell model a good one. The next need is reverse toxicokinetics (TK), which estimates the dose necessary to reach a tissue concentration that is active <i>in vitro</i>. The Johns Hopkins Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT) has created a roadmap for animal-free systemic toxicity testing, in which the needs and opportunities for TK are elaborated, in the context of different systemic toxicities. The report was discussed at two stakeholder forums in Brussels in 2012 and in Washington in 2013; the key recommendations are summarized herein. Contrary to common belief and the Paracelsus paradigm of everything is toxic, the majority of industrial chemicals do not exhibit toxicity. Strengthening the credibility of negative results of alternative approaches for hazard identification, therefore, avoids the need for QIVIVE. Here, especially the combination of methods in integrated testing strategies is most promising. Two further but very different approaches aim to overcome the problem of modeling <i>in vivo</i> complexity: The <i>human-on-a-chip</i> movement aims to reproduce large parts of living organism's complexity via microphysiological systems, that is, organ equivalents combined by microfluidics. At the same time, the Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century (Tox-21c) movement aims for mechanistic approaches (adverse outcome pathways as promoted by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) or pathways of toxicity in the Human Toxome Project) for high-throughput screening, biological phenotyping, and ultimately a systems toxicology approach through integration with computer modeling. These 21st century approaches also require 21st century validation, for example, by evidence-based toxicology. Ultimately, QIVIVE is a prerequisite for extrapolating Tox-21c such approaches to human risk assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied In Vitro Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"4 4\",\"pages\":\"305-316\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/aivt.2016.0026\",\"citationCount\":\"48\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied In Vitro Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/aivt.2016.0026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/12/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied In Vitro Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/aivt.2016.0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/12/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

摘要

体外到体内的定量外推(QIVIVE)被广泛认为是从体外研究结果到剂量范式的先决条件。细胞系统的质量和相关性是QIVIVE的首要先决条件。信息丰富和机械的端点(生物标记物)可以改善推断,但是一个复杂的端点并不能使一个坏的细胞模型变成一个好的模型。下一个需要的是反向毒性动力学(TK),它估计达到体外有效的组织浓度所需的剂量。约翰霍普金斯大学动物试验替代方案中心(CAAT)为无动物全身毒性试验制定了路线图,在不同的全身毒性背景下,详细阐述了传统知识的需求和机会。2012年在布鲁塞尔和2013年在华盛顿举行的两个利益攸关方论坛讨论了该报告;本文总结了主要建议。与“万物皆有毒”的普遍观念和帕拉塞尔苏斯范式相反,大多数工业化学品并不表现出毒性。因此,加强危害识别替代方法的负面结果的可信度,避免了对QIVIVE的需要。在这里,特别是集成测试策略中方法的结合是最有前途的。两种进一步但非常不同的方法旨在克服模拟体内复杂性的问题:人体芯片运动旨在通过微生理系统重现大部分生物体的复杂性,即由微流体结合的器官等效物。与此同时,21世纪毒性测试(Tox-21c)运动旨在采用机械方法(经济合作与发展组织(OECD)倡导的不良结果途径或人类弓形虫计划中的毒性途径)进行高通量筛选、生物表型分析,并最终通过与计算机建模相结合形成系统毒理学方法。这些21世纪的方法也需要21世纪的验证,例如,通过循证毒理学。最终,QIVIVE是推断x-21c这类人类风险评估方法的先决条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perspectives on In Vitro to In Vivo Extrapolations.

Quantitative in vitro to in vivo extrapolation (QIVIVE) is broadly considered a prerequisite bridge from in vitro findings to a dose paradigm. Quality and relevance of cell systems are the first prerequisite for QIVIVE. Information-rich and mechanistic endpoints (biomarkers) improve extrapolations, but a sophisticated endpoint does not make a bad cell model a good one. The next need is reverse toxicokinetics (TK), which estimates the dose necessary to reach a tissue concentration that is active in vitro. The Johns Hopkins Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT) has created a roadmap for animal-free systemic toxicity testing, in which the needs and opportunities for TK are elaborated, in the context of different systemic toxicities. The report was discussed at two stakeholder forums in Brussels in 2012 and in Washington in 2013; the key recommendations are summarized herein. Contrary to common belief and the Paracelsus paradigm of everything is toxic, the majority of industrial chemicals do not exhibit toxicity. Strengthening the credibility of negative results of alternative approaches for hazard identification, therefore, avoids the need for QIVIVE. Here, especially the combination of methods in integrated testing strategies is most promising. Two further but very different approaches aim to overcome the problem of modeling in vivo complexity: The human-on-a-chip movement aims to reproduce large parts of living organism's complexity via microphysiological systems, that is, organ equivalents combined by microfluidics. At the same time, the Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century (Tox-21c) movement aims for mechanistic approaches (adverse outcome pathways as promoted by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) or pathways of toxicity in the Human Toxome Project) for high-throughput screening, biological phenotyping, and ultimately a systems toxicology approach through integration with computer modeling. These 21st century approaches also require 21st century validation, for example, by evidence-based toxicology. Ultimately, QIVIVE is a prerequisite for extrapolating Tox-21c such approaches to human risk assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied In Vitro Toxicology
Applied In Vitro Toxicology Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Applied In Vitro Toxicology is a peer-reviewed journal providing the latest research on the application of alternative in vitro testing methods for predicting adverse effects in the pharmaceutical, chemical, and personal care industries. This Journal aims to address important issues facing the various chemical industries, including regulatory requirements; the reduction, refinement, and replacement of animal testing; new screening methods; evaluation of new cell and tissue models; and the most appropriate methods for assessing safety and satisfying regulatory demands. The Journal also delivers the latest views and opinions of developers of new models, end users of the models, academic laboratories that are inventing new tools, and regulatory agencies in the United States, Europe, Latin America, Australia and Asia. Applied In Vitro Toxicology is the journal that scientists involved with hazard identification and risk assessment will read to understand how new and existing in vitro methods are applied, and the questions for which these models provide answers. Applied In Vitro Toxicology coverage includes: -Applied in vitro toxicology industry standards -New technologies developed for applied in vitro toxicology -Data acquisition, cleaning, distribution, and best practices -Data protection, privacy, and policy -Business interests from research to product -The changing role of in vitro toxicology -Visualization and design principles of applied in vitro toxicology infrastructures -Physical interfaces and robotics -Opportunities around applied in vitro toxicology
期刊最新文献
In Vitro Assessment of Translocation and Toxicological Effects of Nicotine and Ethyl Maltol from e-Cigarettes Using Air–Liquid Interface-Cultured Bronchial Epithelial Cells The Use of Toxicokinetic Information for Setting Concentrations of In Vitro Toxicity Tests and for Interpreting Their Results: A Proposed Workflow Correction to: Assessing Experimental Uncertainty in Defined Approaches: Borderline Ranges for In Chemico and In Vitro Skin Sensitization Methods Determined from Ring Trial Data, by Kolle, et al. Appl In Vitro Toxicol 2021;7(3):102–111; doi: 10.1089/aivt.2021.0003 Protective Effect of Resveratrol on Cytotoxicity, Genotoxicity, and Oxidative Stress Caused by Cyclophosphamide and Methotrexate in Bone Marrow Stem Cell Line and Blood Lymphocytes of the Rat Validation of the VITROCELL Mammalian 48 Exposure Module Using In Vitro Cytotoxicity via the Neutral Red Uptake Assay in Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells Following Exposure to Whole Smoke from Combustible Cigarettes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1