Christian Bacci, Nicola Lucchiari, Anna C Frigo, Carla Stecco, Gastone Zanette, Virginia Dotto, Stefano Sivolella
{"title":"常规钻孔与单钻方法制备种植体部位时产生的温度:一项离体人类下颌骨研究。","authors":"Christian Bacci, Nicola Lucchiari, Anna C Frigo, Carla Stecco, Gastone Zanette, Virginia Dotto, Stefano Sivolella","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4970.19.04142-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nBone overheating during osteotomy is a potential cause of necrosis and consequent failure of dental implant osseointegration. The aim of this study is to identify any differences between conventional osteotomy with drills of increasing size and the use of a single drill in terms of the temperature increase in the bone during implant site preparation.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThirty-eight implant sites were prepared in ex vivo human mandibles, 19 using the conventional method with drills of increasing diameter (group A) and 19 using a single-drill method (group B), with no irrigation in either procedure. An infrared thermometer was used to measure the temperature difference (T°) induced by the drills at each site. Student's t-test (with P<0.05) was used to compare the temperature increase induced by the last drill in group A, and by the single drill in group B.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe mean ΔT° in group A was 0.64 °C, while in group B it was 1.47 °C. The difference between the temperatures obtained in the two groups was statistically significant (P=0.0073).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nIn statistical terms, the two methods differ significantly in the temperature increase induced by the drilling procedure, but this difference is clinically irrelevant.","PeriodicalId":18742,"journal":{"name":"Minerva stomatologica","volume":"68 6","pages":"277-284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temperatures generated during implant site preparation with conventional drilling versus single-drill method: an ex-vivo human mandible study.\",\"authors\":\"Christian Bacci, Nicola Lucchiari, Anna C Frigo, Carla Stecco, Gastone Zanette, Virginia Dotto, Stefano Sivolella\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0026-4970.19.04142-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nBone overheating during osteotomy is a potential cause of necrosis and consequent failure of dental implant osseointegration. The aim of this study is to identify any differences between conventional osteotomy with drills of increasing size and the use of a single drill in terms of the temperature increase in the bone during implant site preparation.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nThirty-eight implant sites were prepared in ex vivo human mandibles, 19 using the conventional method with drills of increasing diameter (group A) and 19 using a single-drill method (group B), with no irrigation in either procedure. An infrared thermometer was used to measure the temperature difference (T°) induced by the drills at each site. Student's t-test (with P<0.05) was used to compare the temperature increase induced by the last drill in group A, and by the single drill in group B.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nThe mean ΔT° in group A was 0.64 °C, while in group B it was 1.47 °C. The difference between the temperatures obtained in the two groups was statistically significant (P=0.0073).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nIn statistical terms, the two methods differ significantly in the temperature increase induced by the drilling procedure, but this difference is clinically irrelevant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva stomatologica\",\"volume\":\"68 6\",\"pages\":\"277-284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva stomatologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4970.19.04142-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva stomatologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4970.19.04142-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Temperatures generated during implant site preparation with conventional drilling versus single-drill method: an ex-vivo human mandible study.
BACKGROUND
Bone overheating during osteotomy is a potential cause of necrosis and consequent failure of dental implant osseointegration. The aim of this study is to identify any differences between conventional osteotomy with drills of increasing size and the use of a single drill in terms of the temperature increase in the bone during implant site preparation.
METHODS
Thirty-eight implant sites were prepared in ex vivo human mandibles, 19 using the conventional method with drills of increasing diameter (group A) and 19 using a single-drill method (group B), with no irrigation in either procedure. An infrared thermometer was used to measure the temperature difference (T°) induced by the drills at each site. Student's t-test (with P<0.05) was used to compare the temperature increase induced by the last drill in group A, and by the single drill in group B.
RESULTS
The mean ΔT° in group A was 0.64 °C, while in group B it was 1.47 °C. The difference between the temperatures obtained in the two groups was statistically significant (P=0.0073).
CONCLUSIONS
In statistical terms, the two methods differ significantly in the temperature increase induced by the drilling procedure, but this difference is clinically irrelevant.
期刊介绍:
The journal Minerva Stomatologica publishes scientific papers on dentistry and maxillo-facial surgery. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, therapeutical notes, special articles and letters to the Editor. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (www.icmje.org). Articles not conforming to international standards will not be considered for acceptance.