了解卫生支付意愿的全球衡量标准。

Q2 Medicine Journal of market access & health policy Pub Date : 2020-02-15 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20016689.2020.1717030
Jean A McDougall, Wesley E Furnback, Bruce C M Wang, Jörg Mahlich
{"title":"了解卫生支付意愿的全球衡量标准。","authors":"Jean A McDougall,&nbsp;Wesley E Furnback,&nbsp;Bruce C M Wang,&nbsp;Jörg Mahlich","doi":"10.1080/20016689.2020.1717030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>: To understand the different methodologies used to elicit willingness to pay for health and the value of a statistical life year through surveys. <b>Methodology</b>: A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to identify studies using surveys to estimate either willingness to pay for health or the value of a statistical life year. Each study was reviewed and the study setting, sample size, sample description, survey administration (online or face to face), survey methodology, and results were extracted. The results of the studies were then compared to any published national guidelines of cost-effectiveness thresholds to determine their accuracy. <b>Results</b>: Eighteen studies were included in the review with 15 classified as willingness to pay and 3 value of a statistical life. The included studies covered Asia (n = 6), Europe (n = 4), the Middle East (n = 1), and North America (n = 5), with one study taking a global perspective. There were substantial differences in both the methodologies and the estimates of both willingness to pay and value of a statistical life between the different studies. <b>Conclusion</b>: Different methods used to elicit willingness to pay and the value of a statistical life year resulted in a wide range of estimates.</p>","PeriodicalId":73811,"journal":{"name":"Journal of market access & health policy","volume":"8 1","pages":"1717030"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20016689.2020.1717030","citationCount":"68","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the global measurement of willingness to pay in health.\",\"authors\":\"Jean A McDougall,&nbsp;Wesley E Furnback,&nbsp;Bruce C M Wang,&nbsp;Jörg Mahlich\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20016689.2020.1717030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective</b>: To understand the different methodologies used to elicit willingness to pay for health and the value of a statistical life year through surveys. <b>Methodology</b>: A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to identify studies using surveys to estimate either willingness to pay for health or the value of a statistical life year. Each study was reviewed and the study setting, sample size, sample description, survey administration (online or face to face), survey methodology, and results were extracted. The results of the studies were then compared to any published national guidelines of cost-effectiveness thresholds to determine their accuracy. <b>Results</b>: Eighteen studies were included in the review with 15 classified as willingness to pay and 3 value of a statistical life. The included studies covered Asia (n = 6), Europe (n = 4), the Middle East (n = 1), and North America (n = 5), with one study taking a global perspective. There were substantial differences in both the methodologies and the estimates of both willingness to pay and value of a statistical life between the different studies. <b>Conclusion</b>: Different methods used to elicit willingness to pay and the value of a statistical life year resulted in a wide range of estimates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of market access & health policy\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"1717030\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20016689.2020.1717030\",\"citationCount\":\"68\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of market access & health policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2020.1717030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of market access & health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2020.1717030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 68

摘要

目的:通过调查了解用于诱导健康支付意愿的不同方法和统计生命年的价值。方法:对文献进行了系统审查,以确定使用调查来估计健康支付意愿或统计生命年价值的研究。对每项研究进行回顾,提取研究设置、样本量、样本描述、调查管理(在线或面对面)、调查方法和结果。然后将研究结果与任何公布的国家成本效益阈值指南进行比较,以确定其准确性。结果:共纳入18项研究,其中15项为支付意愿,3项为统计生命价值。纳入的研究涵盖亚洲(n = 6)、欧洲(n = 4)、中东(n = 1)和北美(n = 5),其中一项研究采取了全球视角。在不同的研究之间,在方法和对支付意愿和统计生命价值的估计方面存在实质性差异。结论:使用不同的方法来引出支付意愿和统计生命年的价值导致了广泛的估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding the global measurement of willingness to pay in health.

Objective: To understand the different methodologies used to elicit willingness to pay for health and the value of a statistical life year through surveys. Methodology: A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to identify studies using surveys to estimate either willingness to pay for health or the value of a statistical life year. Each study was reviewed and the study setting, sample size, sample description, survey administration (online or face to face), survey methodology, and results were extracted. The results of the studies were then compared to any published national guidelines of cost-effectiveness thresholds to determine their accuracy. Results: Eighteen studies were included in the review with 15 classified as willingness to pay and 3 value of a statistical life. The included studies covered Asia (n = 6), Europe (n = 4), the Middle East (n = 1), and North America (n = 5), with one study taking a global perspective. There were substantial differences in both the methodologies and the estimates of both willingness to pay and value of a statistical life between the different studies. Conclusion: Different methods used to elicit willingness to pay and the value of a statistical life year resulted in a wide range of estimates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Value of Further Investment in R&D Using Mixed Methods: A Case Study of Biosensor-Integrated Arteriovenous Grafts. Managing Pharmaceutical Costs in Health Systems: A Review of Affordability, Accessibility and Sustainability Strategies. Operational Efficiency of Public Hospitals in Greece During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Analysis Using DEA and AHP Models. Gatekeeping or Provider Choice for Sustainable Health Systems? A Literature Review on Their Impact on Efficiency, Access, and Quality of Services. Technology Assessment vs. Technology Appraisal-How to Strengthen the Science/Value Dichotomy with EU HTA?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1