用于报销目的的生物仿制药的经济评价——什么,何时,如何?

Q2 Medicine Journal of market access & health policy Pub Date : 2020-03-15 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20016689.2020.1739509
Evelien Moorkens, Hannah Broux, Isabelle Huys, Arnold G Vulto, Steven Simoens
{"title":"用于报销目的的生物仿制药的经济评价——什么,何时,如何?","authors":"Evelien Moorkens,&nbsp;Hannah Broux,&nbsp;Isabelle Huys,&nbsp;Arnold G Vulto,&nbsp;Steven Simoens","doi":"10.1080/20016689.2020.1739509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Limited previous research and guidelines on the design of economic evaluation for biosimilars have led to unresolved methodological questions on how to assess biosimilars. <b>Objectives</b>: We want to raise awareness of and explore methodological issues for the economic evaluation of biosimilars. <b>Methods</b>: We relied on a literature review, exploratory interviews, and our experiences. <b>Results and Conclusions</b>: In the majority of cases in which reimbursement for a biosimilar is sought, it will not be necessary to conduct an economic evaluation, given that the reference product is already reimbursed and standard of care. If the latter is not the case, a full economic evaluation of the biosimilar versus standard of care is needed. This might also be needed in the case of differences in administration form or adherence (for example, due to a nocebo effect) and to take into account value-added services. The entry of biosimilars and of next-generation biological products should trigger a re-assessment of the entire product class. HTA bodies and reimbursement agencies should provide clear guidance on how to assess the value of a biosimilar in each of these circumstances.</p>","PeriodicalId":73811,"journal":{"name":"Journal of market access & health policy","volume":"8 1","pages":"1739509"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20016689.2020.1739509","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic evaluation of biosimilars for reimbursement purposes - what, when, how?\",\"authors\":\"Evelien Moorkens,&nbsp;Hannah Broux,&nbsp;Isabelle Huys,&nbsp;Arnold G Vulto,&nbsp;Steven Simoens\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20016689.2020.1739509\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Limited previous research and guidelines on the design of economic evaluation for biosimilars have led to unresolved methodological questions on how to assess biosimilars. <b>Objectives</b>: We want to raise awareness of and explore methodological issues for the economic evaluation of biosimilars. <b>Methods</b>: We relied on a literature review, exploratory interviews, and our experiences. <b>Results and Conclusions</b>: In the majority of cases in which reimbursement for a biosimilar is sought, it will not be necessary to conduct an economic evaluation, given that the reference product is already reimbursed and standard of care. If the latter is not the case, a full economic evaluation of the biosimilar versus standard of care is needed. This might also be needed in the case of differences in administration form or adherence (for example, due to a nocebo effect) and to take into account value-added services. The entry of biosimilars and of next-generation biological products should trigger a re-assessment of the entire product class. HTA bodies and reimbursement agencies should provide clear guidance on how to assess the value of a biosimilar in each of these circumstances.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of market access & health policy\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"1739509\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20016689.2020.1739509\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of market access & health policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2020.1739509\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of market access & health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2020.1739509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

背景:关于生物仿制药经济评价设计的研究和指南有限,导致了如何评估生物仿制药的方法学问题尚未解决。目的:我们希望提高人们对生物仿制药经济评估的认识并探讨方法问题。方法:我们依靠文献回顾、探索性访谈和我们的经验。结果和结论:在大多数寻求生物仿制药报销的情况下,考虑到参考产品已经报销和护理标准,不需要进行经济评估。如果后者不是这种情况,则需要对生物仿制药与护理标准进行全面的经济评估。在给药形式或依从性存在差异的情况下(例如,由于反安慰剂效应)也可能需要这样做,并考虑到增值服务。生物仿制药和下一代生物制品的进入应触发对整个产品类别的重新评估。HTA机构和报销机构应就如何在每种情况下评估生物仿制药的价值提供明确的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Economic evaluation of biosimilars for reimbursement purposes - what, when, how?

Background: Limited previous research and guidelines on the design of economic evaluation for biosimilars have led to unresolved methodological questions on how to assess biosimilars. Objectives: We want to raise awareness of and explore methodological issues for the economic evaluation of biosimilars. Methods: We relied on a literature review, exploratory interviews, and our experiences. Results and Conclusions: In the majority of cases in which reimbursement for a biosimilar is sought, it will not be necessary to conduct an economic evaluation, given that the reference product is already reimbursed and standard of care. If the latter is not the case, a full economic evaluation of the biosimilar versus standard of care is needed. This might also be needed in the case of differences in administration form or adherence (for example, due to a nocebo effect) and to take into account value-added services. The entry of biosimilars and of next-generation biological products should trigger a re-assessment of the entire product class. HTA bodies and reimbursement agencies should provide clear guidance on how to assess the value of a biosimilar in each of these circumstances.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Value of Further Investment in R&D Using Mixed Methods: A Case Study of Biosensor-Integrated Arteriovenous Grafts. Managing Pharmaceutical Costs in Health Systems: A Review of Affordability, Accessibility and Sustainability Strategies. Operational Efficiency of Public Hospitals in Greece During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Analysis Using DEA and AHP Models. Gatekeeping or Provider Choice for Sustainable Health Systems? A Literature Review on Their Impact on Efficiency, Access, and Quality of Services. Technology Assessment vs. Technology Appraisal-How to Strengthen the Science/Value Dichotomy with EU HTA?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1