抗tsh受体抗体的测量:什么是正确的临界值?

4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Netherlands Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2020-03-01
M A Smit, C M J van Kinschot, J van der Linden, C van Noord, S Kos
{"title":"抗tsh受体抗体的测量:什么是正确的临界值?","authors":"M A Smit,&nbsp;C M J van Kinschot,&nbsp;J van der Linden,&nbsp;C van Noord,&nbsp;S Kos","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Autoantibodies against the thyroid stimulating hormone receptor, thyrotropin receptor autoantibodies (TRAb) are diagnostic for Graves' disease and can be measured by different methods. As antibody concentrations are not comparable between methods, appropriate cut-off values need to be established for every single method. For a third-generation TRAb assay (Phadia, Thermofisher), the manufacturer determined the cut-off value in a study population consisting of Graves' disease (both newly diagnosed and patients under treatment) and non-Graves' disease patients. The aim of this study was to verify whether this cut-off value holds true in our population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis was performed on TRAb measurements collected over a period of six months from all patients referred for TRAb testing. For our study, we included patients that were newly diagnosed with hyperthyroidism including Graves' disease, multinodular goitre, toxic adenoma, and thyroiditis. Furthermore, we included Graves' patients that were under treatment at the time of TRAb measurement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Whereas all patients with Graves' disease had positive TRAb, few patients with multinodular goitre, toxic adenoma, and thyroiditis scored positive for TRAb. ROC curve analysis revealed a cut-off value of 4.5 IU/l (compared to 3.3 IU/l established by the manufacturer). Newly diagnosed Graves' patients had higher TRAb concentrations compared to patients under treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cut-off value of this immunoassay should probably be set higher in untreated Graves' patients than proposed by the manufacturer as the cut-off value should be determined in a study population excluding Graves' patients under treatment. The overall clinical picture remains crucial in the diagnosis of Graves' disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":18918,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands Journal of Medicine","volume":"78 2","pages":"55-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement of anti-TSH receptor antibodies: what is the correct cut-off value?\",\"authors\":\"M A Smit,&nbsp;C M J van Kinschot,&nbsp;J van der Linden,&nbsp;C van Noord,&nbsp;S Kos\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Autoantibodies against the thyroid stimulating hormone receptor, thyrotropin receptor autoantibodies (TRAb) are diagnostic for Graves' disease and can be measured by different methods. As antibody concentrations are not comparable between methods, appropriate cut-off values need to be established for every single method. For a third-generation TRAb assay (Phadia, Thermofisher), the manufacturer determined the cut-off value in a study population consisting of Graves' disease (both newly diagnosed and patients under treatment) and non-Graves' disease patients. The aim of this study was to verify whether this cut-off value holds true in our population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis was performed on TRAb measurements collected over a period of six months from all patients referred for TRAb testing. For our study, we included patients that were newly diagnosed with hyperthyroidism including Graves' disease, multinodular goitre, toxic adenoma, and thyroiditis. Furthermore, we included Graves' patients that were under treatment at the time of TRAb measurement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Whereas all patients with Graves' disease had positive TRAb, few patients with multinodular goitre, toxic adenoma, and thyroiditis scored positive for TRAb. ROC curve analysis revealed a cut-off value of 4.5 IU/l (compared to 3.3 IU/l established by the manufacturer). Newly diagnosed Graves' patients had higher TRAb concentrations compared to patients under treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cut-off value of this immunoassay should probably be set higher in untreated Graves' patients than proposed by the manufacturer as the cut-off value should be determined in a study population excluding Graves' patients under treatment. The overall clinical picture remains crucial in the diagnosis of Graves' disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18918,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Netherlands Journal of Medicine\",\"volume\":\"78 2\",\"pages\":\"55-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Netherlands Journal of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Netherlands Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:抗促甲状腺激素受体的自身抗体、促甲状腺激素受体自身抗体(TRAb)是Graves病的诊断指标,可通过不同的方法检测。由于不同方法之间的抗体浓度不具有可比性,因此需要为每种方法建立适当的临界值。对于第三代TRAb检测(Phadia, Thermofisher),制造商确定了由Graves病(包括新诊断和正在治疗的患者)和非Graves病患者组成的研究人群的临界值。这项研究的目的是验证这个临界值是否在我们的人群中成立。方法:回顾性分析从所有转介进行TRAb检测的患者收集的TRAb测量值,为期6个月。在我们的研究中,我们纳入了新诊断为甲状腺功能亢进的患者,包括Graves病、多结节性甲状腺肿、中毒性腺瘤和甲状腺炎。此外,我们纳入了在TRAb测量时正在接受治疗的Graves患者。结果:所有格雷夫斯病患者TRAb均呈阳性,而多结节性甲状腺肿、中毒性腺瘤和甲状腺炎患者TRAb呈阳性。ROC曲线分析显示,临界值为4.5 IU/l(而制造商设定的临界值为3.3 IU/l)。与接受治疗的患者相比,新诊断的Graves患者的TRAb浓度更高。结论:在未经治疗的Graves患者中,这种免疫测定的临界值可能应该设定得比制造商建议的更高,因为临界值应该在排除正在治疗的Graves患者的研究人群中确定。总体临床图像仍然是格雷夫斯病诊断的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measurement of anti-TSH receptor antibodies: what is the correct cut-off value?

Background: Autoantibodies against the thyroid stimulating hormone receptor, thyrotropin receptor autoantibodies (TRAb) are diagnostic for Graves' disease and can be measured by different methods. As antibody concentrations are not comparable between methods, appropriate cut-off values need to be established for every single method. For a third-generation TRAb assay (Phadia, Thermofisher), the manufacturer determined the cut-off value in a study population consisting of Graves' disease (both newly diagnosed and patients under treatment) and non-Graves' disease patients. The aim of this study was to verify whether this cut-off value holds true in our population.

Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on TRAb measurements collected over a period of six months from all patients referred for TRAb testing. For our study, we included patients that were newly diagnosed with hyperthyroidism including Graves' disease, multinodular goitre, toxic adenoma, and thyroiditis. Furthermore, we included Graves' patients that were under treatment at the time of TRAb measurement.

Results: Whereas all patients with Graves' disease had positive TRAb, few patients with multinodular goitre, toxic adenoma, and thyroiditis scored positive for TRAb. ROC curve analysis revealed a cut-off value of 4.5 IU/l (compared to 3.3 IU/l established by the manufacturer). Newly diagnosed Graves' patients had higher TRAb concentrations compared to patients under treatment.

Conclusion: The cut-off value of this immunoassay should probably be set higher in untreated Graves' patients than proposed by the manufacturer as the cut-off value should be determined in a study population excluding Graves' patients under treatment. The overall clinical picture remains crucial in the diagnosis of Graves' disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Netherlands Journal of Medicine
Netherlands Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Netherlands Journal of Medicine publishes papers in all relevant fields of internal medicine. In addition to reports of original clinical and experimental studies, reviews on topics of interest or importance, case reports, book reviews and letters to the editor are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Hypotonic polyuria: at the cross-roads of copeptin. Severe acute respiratory infections surveillance for early signals in the community. Implementation of 'Choosing Wisely Netherlands' for internal medicine. Doppler follow-up after TIPS placement is not routinely indicated. A 16-years single centre experience. A healthcare failure mode and effect analysis to optimise the process of blood culture performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1