[在雇员少于10人的小型企业促进参与式工作场所环境改善的为期两年的计划]。

Hitomi Kurogi, Jiro Moriguchi, Haruyuki Uchida, Fumiko Ohashi, Chiyo Igarashi, Yuko Odagiri, Akihito Shimazu, Akizumi Tsutsumi, Noriko Nishikido, Takashi Haratani, Etsuko Yoshikawa, Toru Yoshikawa, Norito Kawakami
{"title":"[在雇员少于10人的小型企业促进参与式工作场所环境改善的为期两年的计划]。","authors":"Hitomi Kurogi,&nbsp;Jiro Moriguchi,&nbsp;Haruyuki Uchida,&nbsp;Fumiko Ohashi,&nbsp;Chiyo Igarashi,&nbsp;Yuko Odagiri,&nbsp;Akihito Shimazu,&nbsp;Akizumi Tsutsumi,&nbsp;Noriko Nishikido,&nbsp;Takashi Haratani,&nbsp;Etsuko Yoshikawa,&nbsp;Toru Yoshikawa,&nbsp;Norito Kawakami","doi":"10.1539/sangyoeisei.2019-022-E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine the influence of participatory workplace environmental improvement program on reducing job stress and workers' psychological distress at small enterprises (i.e., less than 10 employees). Furthermore, this study aimed to clarify important factors for success of this program as well.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The model program was tested in a small enterprise with eight employees between October 2014 and January 2017. Moreover, five employees participated in the annual work environment improvement workshops for two consecutive years. During both years, the New Brief Job Stress Questionnaire (80-item version) was used to measure work-related stress before (baseline) and after (post-three months and post-12 months) the workshops. To assess the extent of an intervention effect, the questionnaire data were analyzed using the Friedman test and the multiple comparison test annually. In addition, continuous data were analyzed during the two years. The statistical significance of the differences across time was determined at the p < .10 cutoff value because the number of participants was small. The effect size was also calculated. The participants were interviewed regularly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For both years, the employees implemented action plans within one month of completing the workshops. In the first year, the data for the Friedman test indicated a significant change in role conflict, job resources (workgroup-level), respect for individuals, fair personnel evaluations, work-self balance (positive), workplace social capital, and job satisfaction. In the multiple comparison test, significant changes manifested in role conflict and workplace social capital. In the second year, significant changes were found regarding role conflict and fair personnel evaluations for the Friedman test, demonstrating significant changes in role conflict in the multiple comparison test. As per the two-year survey results, the Friedman test indicated significant changes in role conflict, respect for individuals, and fair personnel evaluations, while the multiple comparison test demonstrated no significant changes. Over time, favorable changes were found regarding role conflict in the first year; however, undesirable changes were found regarding the other statistically significant items. The interviews revealed both positive and negative opinions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found the effects of the participatory workplace environment improvement program to be limited. Thus, the program should be improved to reduce its adverse effects as well as the participants' negative opinions.</p>","PeriodicalId":40039,"journal":{"name":"Sangyo eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health","volume":"62 6","pages":"249-260"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[A two-year program to promote participatory workplace environmental improvements at small enterprises with fewer than ten employees].\",\"authors\":\"Hitomi Kurogi,&nbsp;Jiro Moriguchi,&nbsp;Haruyuki Uchida,&nbsp;Fumiko Ohashi,&nbsp;Chiyo Igarashi,&nbsp;Yuko Odagiri,&nbsp;Akihito Shimazu,&nbsp;Akizumi Tsutsumi,&nbsp;Noriko Nishikido,&nbsp;Takashi Haratani,&nbsp;Etsuko Yoshikawa,&nbsp;Toru Yoshikawa,&nbsp;Norito Kawakami\",\"doi\":\"10.1539/sangyoeisei.2019-022-E\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine the influence of participatory workplace environmental improvement program on reducing job stress and workers' psychological distress at small enterprises (i.e., less than 10 employees). Furthermore, this study aimed to clarify important factors for success of this program as well.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The model program was tested in a small enterprise with eight employees between October 2014 and January 2017. Moreover, five employees participated in the annual work environment improvement workshops for two consecutive years. During both years, the New Brief Job Stress Questionnaire (80-item version) was used to measure work-related stress before (baseline) and after (post-three months and post-12 months) the workshops. To assess the extent of an intervention effect, the questionnaire data were analyzed using the Friedman test and the multiple comparison test annually. In addition, continuous data were analyzed during the two years. The statistical significance of the differences across time was determined at the p < .10 cutoff value because the number of participants was small. The effect size was also calculated. The participants were interviewed regularly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For both years, the employees implemented action plans within one month of completing the workshops. In the first year, the data for the Friedman test indicated a significant change in role conflict, job resources (workgroup-level), respect for individuals, fair personnel evaluations, work-self balance (positive), workplace social capital, and job satisfaction. In the multiple comparison test, significant changes manifested in role conflict and workplace social capital. In the second year, significant changes were found regarding role conflict and fair personnel evaluations for the Friedman test, demonstrating significant changes in role conflict in the multiple comparison test. As per the two-year survey results, the Friedman test indicated significant changes in role conflict, respect for individuals, and fair personnel evaluations, while the multiple comparison test demonstrated no significant changes. Over time, favorable changes were found regarding role conflict in the first year; however, undesirable changes were found regarding the other statistically significant items. The interviews revealed both positive and negative opinions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found the effects of the participatory workplace environment improvement program to be limited. Thus, the program should be improved to reduce its adverse effects as well as the participants' negative opinions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sangyo eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health\",\"volume\":\"62 6\",\"pages\":\"249-260\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sangyo eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1539/sangyoeisei.2019-022-E\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/5/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sangyo eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1539/sangyoeisei.2019-022-E","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在确定参与式工作场所环境改善计划对减少小型企业(即少于10人)工作压力和员工心理困扰的影响。此外,本研究旨在阐明该计划成功的重要因素。方法:2014年10月至2017年1月,在一家拥有8名员工的小型企业对模型程序进行了测试。此外,有5名员工连续两年参加年度工作环境改善工作坊。在这两年中,新工作压力问卷(80项版本)被用来测量工作压力在研讨会之前(基线)和之后(三个月后和12个月后)。为了评估干预效果的程度,每年使用Friedman检验和多重比较检验对问卷数据进行分析。此外,还对两年内的连续数据进行了分析。由于参与者人数较少,因此在p < 0.10的截止值下确定了不同时间差异的统计显著性。并计算了效应量。参与者定期接受采访。结果:两年内,员工在完成工作坊后的一个月内都实施了行动计划。在第一年,弗里德曼测试的数据表明角色冲突、工作资源(工作组层面)、对个人的尊重、公平的人事评估、工作与自我平衡(积极)、工作场所社会资本和工作满意度发生了显著变化。在多重比较检验中,角色冲突和职场社会资本表现出显著的变化。第二年,在Friedman测试中,角色冲突和公平的人员评价出现了显著的变化,表明多重比较测试中角色冲突发生了显著的变化。从两年的调查结果来看,Friedman检验显示角色冲突、个人尊重和公平的人员评价发生了显著变化,而多重比较检验显示没有显著变化。随着时间的推移,第一年的角色冲突发生了有利的变化;然而,在其他统计上显著的项目上发现了不希望的变化。采访中既有正面的,也有负面的。结论:本研究发现参与式工作环境改善计划的效果有限。因此,该计划需要改进,以减少其不利影响,以及参与者的负面意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[A two-year program to promote participatory workplace environmental improvements at small enterprises with fewer than ten employees].

Objective: This study aimed to determine the influence of participatory workplace environmental improvement program on reducing job stress and workers' psychological distress at small enterprises (i.e., less than 10 employees). Furthermore, this study aimed to clarify important factors for success of this program as well.

Methods: The model program was tested in a small enterprise with eight employees between October 2014 and January 2017. Moreover, five employees participated in the annual work environment improvement workshops for two consecutive years. During both years, the New Brief Job Stress Questionnaire (80-item version) was used to measure work-related stress before (baseline) and after (post-three months and post-12 months) the workshops. To assess the extent of an intervention effect, the questionnaire data were analyzed using the Friedman test and the multiple comparison test annually. In addition, continuous data were analyzed during the two years. The statistical significance of the differences across time was determined at the p < .10 cutoff value because the number of participants was small. The effect size was also calculated. The participants were interviewed regularly.

Results: For both years, the employees implemented action plans within one month of completing the workshops. In the first year, the data for the Friedman test indicated a significant change in role conflict, job resources (workgroup-level), respect for individuals, fair personnel evaluations, work-self balance (positive), workplace social capital, and job satisfaction. In the multiple comparison test, significant changes manifested in role conflict and workplace social capital. In the second year, significant changes were found regarding role conflict and fair personnel evaluations for the Friedman test, demonstrating significant changes in role conflict in the multiple comparison test. As per the two-year survey results, the Friedman test indicated significant changes in role conflict, respect for individuals, and fair personnel evaluations, while the multiple comparison test demonstrated no significant changes. Over time, favorable changes were found regarding role conflict in the first year; however, undesirable changes were found regarding the other statistically significant items. The interviews revealed both positive and negative opinions.

Conclusions: This study found the effects of the participatory workplace environment improvement program to be limited. Thus, the program should be improved to reduce its adverse effects as well as the participants' negative opinions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
[Selecting measurement subject workers for evaluation using a personal sampling method: a case involving analytical chemistry experiments at a university laboratory]. [The past and future of occupational health nursing research in Japan]. [Association between mental health, fear of COVID-19, and job insecurity among bus service workers during the COVID-19 pandemic]. [Convenient health initiatives to help small- and medium-sized enterprises with mental health, lifestyle-related diseases, and hazardous work]. [Development and validation of the University of Tokyo Occupational Mental Health leadership checklist among occupational health specialists].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1