评价骨软骨组织粘接剂的生物力学试验模型。

BMC biomedical engineering Pub Date : 2019-05-07 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s42490-019-0011-2
Philip Procter, Michael Pujari-Palmer, Gry Hulsart-Billström, David Wenner, Gerard Insley, Sune Larsson, Håkan Engqvist
{"title":"评价骨软骨组织粘接剂的生物力学试验模型。","authors":"Philip Procter,&nbsp;Michael Pujari-Palmer,&nbsp;Gry Hulsart-Billström,&nbsp;David Wenner,&nbsp;Gerard Insley,&nbsp;Sune Larsson,&nbsp;Håkan Engqvist","doi":"10.1186/s42490-019-0011-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently there are no standard models with which to evaluate the biomechanical performance of calcified tissue adhesives, in vivo<i>.</i> We present, herein, a pre-clinical murine distal femoral bone model for evaluating tissue adhesives intended for use in both osseous and osteochondral tissue reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cylindrical cores (diameter (Ø) 2 mm (mm) × 2 mm depth), containing both cancellous and cortical bone, were fractured out from the distal femur and then reattached using one of two tissue adhesives. The adhesiveness of fibrin glue (Tisseel<sup>tm</sup>), and a novel, biocompatible, calcium phosphate-based tissue adhesive (OsStic<sup>tm</sup>) were evaluated by pullout testing, in which glued cores were extracted and the peak force at failure recorded. The results show that Tisseel weakly bonded the metaphyseal bone cores, while OsStic produced > 30-fold higher mean peak forces at failure (7.64 Newtons (N) vs. 0.21 N). The failure modes were consistently disparate, with Tisseel failing gradually, while OsStic failed abruptly, as would be expected with a calcium-based material. Imaging of the bone/adhesive interface with microcomputed tomography revealed that, for OsStic, failure occurred more often within cancellous bone (75% of tested samples) rather than at the adhesive interface.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the challenges associated with biomechanical testing in small rodent models the preclinical ex-vivo test model presented herein is both sensitive and accurate. It enabled differences in tissue adhesive strength to be quantified even for very small osseous fragments (<Ø4mm). Importantly, this model can easily be scaled to larger animals and adapted to fracture fragment fixation in human bone. The present model is also compatible with other long-term in vivo evaluation methods (i.e. in vivo imaging, histological analysis, etc.).</p>","PeriodicalId":72425,"journal":{"name":"BMC biomedical engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s42490-019-0011-2","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A biomechanical test model for evaluating osseous and osteochondral tissue adhesives.\",\"authors\":\"Philip Procter,&nbsp;Michael Pujari-Palmer,&nbsp;Gry Hulsart-Billström,&nbsp;David Wenner,&nbsp;Gerard Insley,&nbsp;Sune Larsson,&nbsp;Håkan Engqvist\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42490-019-0011-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently there are no standard models with which to evaluate the biomechanical performance of calcified tissue adhesives, in vivo<i>.</i> We present, herein, a pre-clinical murine distal femoral bone model for evaluating tissue adhesives intended for use in both osseous and osteochondral tissue reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cylindrical cores (diameter (Ø) 2 mm (mm) × 2 mm depth), containing both cancellous and cortical bone, were fractured out from the distal femur and then reattached using one of two tissue adhesives. The adhesiveness of fibrin glue (Tisseel<sup>tm</sup>), and a novel, biocompatible, calcium phosphate-based tissue adhesive (OsStic<sup>tm</sup>) were evaluated by pullout testing, in which glued cores were extracted and the peak force at failure recorded. The results show that Tisseel weakly bonded the metaphyseal bone cores, while OsStic produced > 30-fold higher mean peak forces at failure (7.64 Newtons (N) vs. 0.21 N). The failure modes were consistently disparate, with Tisseel failing gradually, while OsStic failed abruptly, as would be expected with a calcium-based material. Imaging of the bone/adhesive interface with microcomputed tomography revealed that, for OsStic, failure occurred more often within cancellous bone (75% of tested samples) rather than at the adhesive interface.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the challenges associated with biomechanical testing in small rodent models the preclinical ex-vivo test model presented herein is both sensitive and accurate. It enabled differences in tissue adhesive strength to be quantified even for very small osseous fragments (<Ø4mm). Importantly, this model can easily be scaled to larger animals and adapted to fracture fragment fixation in human bone. The present model is also compatible with other long-term in vivo evaluation methods (i.e. in vivo imaging, histological analysis, etc.).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC biomedical engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s42490-019-0011-2\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC biomedical engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42490-019-0011-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC biomedical engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42490-019-0011-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

背景:目前还没有标准模型来评估钙化组织粘接剂在体内的生物力学性能。在此,我们提出了一个临床前小鼠股骨远端骨模型,用于评估用于骨性和骨软骨组织重建的组织粘接剂。结果:从股骨远端骨折取出包含松质骨和皮质骨的圆柱形核(直径(Ø) 2mm × 2mm深),然后使用两种组织粘接剂中的一种重新连接。纤维蛋白胶(Tisseeltm)和一种新型的生物相容性磷酸钙基组织胶(OsStictm)的黏附性通过拉出测试进行评估,在拉出测试中,胶芯被取出并记录失效时的峰值力。结果表明,Tisseel与干骺端骨核心的结合较弱,而OsStic在破坏时产生的平均峰值力高出30倍(7.64牛顿(N)比0.21牛顿)。失效模式一直是不同的,Tisseel逐渐失效,而OsStic突然失效,这与钙基材料的预期一样。骨/粘接剂界面的显微计算机断层成像显示,对于OsStic,失效更常发生在松质骨内(75%的测试样本),而不是发生在粘接剂界面。结论:尽管在小型啮齿动物模型中进行生物力学测试存在挑战,但本文提出的临床前离体测试模型既灵敏又准确。即使是非常小的骨碎片,它也可以量化组织粘接强度的差异(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A biomechanical test model for evaluating osseous and osteochondral tissue adhesives.

Background: Currently there are no standard models with which to evaluate the biomechanical performance of calcified tissue adhesives, in vivo. We present, herein, a pre-clinical murine distal femoral bone model for evaluating tissue adhesives intended for use in both osseous and osteochondral tissue reconstruction.

Results: Cylindrical cores (diameter (Ø) 2 mm (mm) × 2 mm depth), containing both cancellous and cortical bone, were fractured out from the distal femur and then reattached using one of two tissue adhesives. The adhesiveness of fibrin glue (Tisseeltm), and a novel, biocompatible, calcium phosphate-based tissue adhesive (OsStictm) were evaluated by pullout testing, in which glued cores were extracted and the peak force at failure recorded. The results show that Tisseel weakly bonded the metaphyseal bone cores, while OsStic produced > 30-fold higher mean peak forces at failure (7.64 Newtons (N) vs. 0.21 N). The failure modes were consistently disparate, with Tisseel failing gradually, while OsStic failed abruptly, as would be expected with a calcium-based material. Imaging of the bone/adhesive interface with microcomputed tomography revealed that, for OsStic, failure occurred more often within cancellous bone (75% of tested samples) rather than at the adhesive interface.

Conclusions: Despite the challenges associated with biomechanical testing in small rodent models the preclinical ex-vivo test model presented herein is both sensitive and accurate. It enabled differences in tissue adhesive strength to be quantified even for very small osseous fragments (<Ø4mm). Importantly, this model can easily be scaled to larger animals and adapted to fracture fragment fixation in human bone. The present model is also compatible with other long-term in vivo evaluation methods (i.e. in vivo imaging, histological analysis, etc.).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
The neurophysiology of sensorimotor prosthetic control. Multi-parameter viscoelastic material model for denture adhesives based on time-temperature superposition and multiple linear regression analysis. The effect of using the hip exoskeleton assistive (HEXA) robot compared to conventional physiotherapy on clinical functional outcomes in stroke patients with hemiplegia: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Short-term epileptic seizures prediction based on cepstrum analysis and signal morphology. A handheld device for intra-cavity and ex vivo fluorescence imaging of breast conserving surgery margins with 5-aminolevulinic acid.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1