变通神器的价值与使用:医院护士“脑”使用的认知工作分析。

IF 2.2 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making Pub Date : 2019-06-01 Epub Date: 2019-02-04 DOI:10.1177/1555343418825429
Austin F Mount-Campbell, Kevin D Evans, David D Woods, Esther M Chipps, Susan D Moffatt-Bruce, Emily S Patterson
{"title":"变通神器的价值与使用:医院护士“脑”使用的认知工作分析。","authors":"Austin F Mount-Campbell,&nbsp;Kevin D Evans,&nbsp;David D Woods,&nbsp;Esther M Chipps,&nbsp;Susan D Moffatt-Bruce,&nbsp;Emily S Patterson","doi":"10.1177/1555343418825429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We identify the value and usage of a cognitive artifact used by hospital nurses. By analyzing the value and usage of workaround artifacts, unmet needs using intended systems can be uncovered. A descriptive study employed direct observations of registered nurses at two hospitals using a paper workaround (\"brains\") and the Electronic Health Record. Field notes and photographs were taken; the format, size, layout, permanence, and content of the artifact were analyzed. Thirty-nine observations, spanning 156 hr, were conducted with 20 nurses across four clinical units. A total of 322 photographs of paper-based artifacts for 161 patients were collected. All participants used and updated \"brains\" during report, and throughout the shift, most were self-generated. These artifacts contained patient identifiers in a header with room number, last name, age, code status, and physician; clinical data were recorded in the body with historical chronic issues, detailed assessment information, and planned activities for the shift. Updates continuously made during the shift highlighted important information, updated values, and tracked the completion of activities. The primary functional uses of \"brains\" are to support nurses' needs for clinical immediacy through personally generated snapshot overviews for clinical summaries and updates to the status of planned activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":46342,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1555343418825429","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Value and Usage of a Workaround Artifact: A Cognitive Work Analysis of \\\"Brains\\\" Use by Hospital Nurses.\",\"authors\":\"Austin F Mount-Campbell,&nbsp;Kevin D Evans,&nbsp;David D Woods,&nbsp;Esther M Chipps,&nbsp;Susan D Moffatt-Bruce,&nbsp;Emily S Patterson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1555343418825429\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We identify the value and usage of a cognitive artifact used by hospital nurses. By analyzing the value and usage of workaround artifacts, unmet needs using intended systems can be uncovered. A descriptive study employed direct observations of registered nurses at two hospitals using a paper workaround (\\\"brains\\\") and the Electronic Health Record. Field notes and photographs were taken; the format, size, layout, permanence, and content of the artifact were analyzed. Thirty-nine observations, spanning 156 hr, were conducted with 20 nurses across four clinical units. A total of 322 photographs of paper-based artifacts for 161 patients were collected. All participants used and updated \\\"brains\\\" during report, and throughout the shift, most were self-generated. These artifacts contained patient identifiers in a header with room number, last name, age, code status, and physician; clinical data were recorded in the body with historical chronic issues, detailed assessment information, and planned activities for the shift. Updates continuously made during the shift highlighted important information, updated values, and tracked the completion of activities. The primary functional uses of \\\"brains\\\" are to support nurses' needs for clinical immediacy through personally generated snapshot overviews for clinical summaries and updates to the status of planned activities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1555343418825429\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1555343418825429\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/2/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1555343418825429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

我们确定了医院护士使用的认知人工制品的价值和用途。通过分析工作环境工件的价值和使用情况,可以发现使用预期系统的未满足需求。一项描述性研究使用纸质解决方案(“大脑”)和电子健康记录对两家医院的注册护士进行了直接观察。拍摄了实地记录和照片;分析了工件的格式、大小、布局、持久性和内容。对四个临床单位的20名护士进行了39次观察,历时156小时。共收集161例患者的322张纸质人工制品照片。所有参与者在报告期间都使用和更新“大脑”,在整个轮班中,大多数都是自己生成的。这些工件在标头中包含患者标识符,其中包含房间号、姓氏、年龄、代码状态和医生;临床资料被记录在有历史慢性问题的身体,详细的评估信息和计划的活动的转变。在轮班期间不断进行更新,突出重要信息,更新值,并跟踪活动的完成情况。“大脑”的主要功能用途是通过个人生成的临床总结快照概述和计划活动状态的更新来支持护士对临床即时性的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Value and Usage of a Workaround Artifact: A Cognitive Work Analysis of "Brains" Use by Hospital Nurses.

We identify the value and usage of a cognitive artifact used by hospital nurses. By analyzing the value and usage of workaround artifacts, unmet needs using intended systems can be uncovered. A descriptive study employed direct observations of registered nurses at two hospitals using a paper workaround ("brains") and the Electronic Health Record. Field notes and photographs were taken; the format, size, layout, permanence, and content of the artifact were analyzed. Thirty-nine observations, spanning 156 hr, were conducted with 20 nurses across four clinical units. A total of 322 photographs of paper-based artifacts for 161 patients were collected. All participants used and updated "brains" during report, and throughout the shift, most were self-generated. These artifacts contained patient identifiers in a header with room number, last name, age, code status, and physician; clinical data were recorded in the body with historical chronic issues, detailed assessment information, and planned activities for the shift. Updates continuously made during the shift highlighted important information, updated values, and tracked the completion of activities. The primary functional uses of "brains" are to support nurses' needs for clinical immediacy through personally generated snapshot overviews for clinical summaries and updates to the status of planned activities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Introduction to the Special Issue on Automation Failure Augmenting Human Cognition With a Digital Submarine Periscope Get on the Round Dial: Fighter Pilot Strategies for Recovering Situation Awareness After Disorienting Physiological Events Distinguishing Urgent From Non-urgent Communications: A Mixed Methods Study of Communication Technology Use in Perinatal Care Wrong, Strong, and Silent: What Happens when Automated Systems With High Autonomy and High Authority Misbehave?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1