流行病学中阴性对照方法的选择性回顾。

3区 医学 Current Epidemiology Reports Pub Date : 2020-12-01 Epub Date: 2020-10-15 DOI:10.1007/s40471-020-00243-4
Xu Shi, Wang Miao, Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen
{"title":"流行病学中阴性对照方法的选择性回顾。","authors":"Xu Shi, Wang Miao, Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen","doi":"10.1007/s40471-020-00243-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Negative controls are a powerful tool to detect and adjust for bias in epidemiological research. This paper introduces negative controls to a broader audience and provides guidance on principled design and causal analysis based on a formal negative control framework.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>We review and summarize causal and statistical assumptions, practical strategies, and validation criteria that can be combined with subject-matter knowledge to perform negative control analyses. We also review existing statistical methodologies for the detection, reduction, and correction of confounding bias, and briefly discuss recent advances towards nonparametric identification of causal effects in a double-negative control design.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>There is great potential for valid and accurate causal inference leveraging contemporary healthcare data in which negative controls are routinely available. Design and analysis of observational data leveraging negative controls is an area of growing interest in health and social sciences. Despite these developments, further effort is needed to disseminate these novel methods to ensure they are adopted by practicing epidemiologists.</p>","PeriodicalId":48527,"journal":{"name":"Current Epidemiology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8118596/pdf/nihms-1655093.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Selective Review of Negative Control Methods in Epidemiology.\",\"authors\":\"Xu Shi, Wang Miao, Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40471-020-00243-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Negative controls are a powerful tool to detect and adjust for bias in epidemiological research. This paper introduces negative controls to a broader audience and provides guidance on principled design and causal analysis based on a formal negative control framework.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>We review and summarize causal and statistical assumptions, practical strategies, and validation criteria that can be combined with subject-matter knowledge to perform negative control analyses. We also review existing statistical methodologies for the detection, reduction, and correction of confounding bias, and briefly discuss recent advances towards nonparametric identification of causal effects in a double-negative control design.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>There is great potential for valid and accurate causal inference leveraging contemporary healthcare data in which negative controls are routinely available. Design and analysis of observational data leveraging negative controls is an area of growing interest in health and social sciences. Despite these developments, further effort is needed to disseminate these novel methods to ensure they are adopted by practicing epidemiologists.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Epidemiology Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8118596/pdf/nihms-1655093.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Epidemiology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40471-020-00243-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/10/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Epidemiology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40471-020-00243-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

审查目的:阴性对照是流行病学研究中检测和调整偏倚的有力工具。本文向更广泛的读者介绍了阴性对照,并基于正式的阴性对照框架,为原则性设计和因果分析提供指导:我们回顾并总结了因果和统计假设、实用策略以及验证标准,这些可以与主题知识相结合来执行负向控制分析。我们还回顾了用于检测、减少和校正混杂偏倚的现有统计方法,并简要讨论了在双阴性对照设计中对因果效应进行非参数识别的最新进展。摘要:利用常规阴性对照的当代医疗保健数据进行有效、准确的因果推断具有巨大潜力。利用阴性对照设计和分析观察数据是健康和社会科学领域日益关注的一个领域。尽管取得了这些进展,但仍需进一步努力推广这些新方法,以确保它们被流行病学从业人员所采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Selective Review of Negative Control Methods in Epidemiology.

Purpose of review: Negative controls are a powerful tool to detect and adjust for bias in epidemiological research. This paper introduces negative controls to a broader audience and provides guidance on principled design and causal analysis based on a formal negative control framework.

Recent findings: We review and summarize causal and statistical assumptions, practical strategies, and validation criteria that can be combined with subject-matter knowledge to perform negative control analyses. We also review existing statistical methodologies for the detection, reduction, and correction of confounding bias, and briefly discuss recent advances towards nonparametric identification of causal effects in a double-negative control design.

Summary: There is great potential for valid and accurate causal inference leveraging contemporary healthcare data in which negative controls are routinely available. Design and analysis of observational data leveraging negative controls is an area of growing interest in health and social sciences. Despite these developments, further effort is needed to disseminate these novel methods to ensure they are adopted by practicing epidemiologists.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Epidemiology Reports
Current Epidemiology Reports OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊最新文献
Gentrification and Health: A Review of the Literature, 2018–2023 The Target Cohort Approach: An Extension of the Target Trial Framework to Nested Case-Control Studies with Incidence Density Sampling The Intersection of the Microbiome and Adiposity in Cancer Risk and Outcomes: Breast, Endometrial, and Colorectal Cancers Towards a Precision Model for Environmental Public Health: Wastewater-based Epidemiology to Assess Population-level Exposures and Related Diseases Vitamin D and Toxic Metals in Pregnancy - a Biological Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1