1型糖尿病患者膳食碳水化合物计数误差的评价。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2021-05-25 DOI:10.1055/a-1493-2324
Sina Buck, Collin Krauss, Delia Waldenmaier, Christina Liebing, Nina Jendrike, Josef Högel, Boris M Pfeiffer, Cornelia Haug, Guido Freckmann
{"title":"1型糖尿病患者膳食碳水化合物计数误差的评价。","authors":"Sina Buck,&nbsp;Collin Krauss,&nbsp;Delia Waldenmaier,&nbsp;Christina Liebing,&nbsp;Nina Jendrike,&nbsp;Josef Högel,&nbsp;Boris M Pfeiffer,&nbsp;Cornelia Haug,&nbsp;Guido Freckmann","doi":"10.1055/a-1493-2324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Correct estimation of meal carbohydrate content is a prerequisite for successful intensified insulin therapy in patients with diabetes. In this survey, the counting error in adult patients with type 1 diabetes was investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-four patients with type 1 diabetes estimated the carbohydrate content of 24 standardized test meals. The test meals were categorized into 1 of 3 groups with different carbohydrate content: low, medium, and high. Estimation results were compared with the meals' actual carbohydrate content as determined by calculation based on weighing. A subgroup of the participants estimated the test meals for a second (n=35) and a third time (n=22) with a mean period of 11 months between the estimations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the first estimation, the carbohydrate content was underestimated by -28% (-50, 0) of the actual carbohydrate content. Particularly meals with high mean carbohydrate content were underestimated by -34% (-56, -13). Median counting error improved significantly when estimations were performed for a second time (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants generally underestimated the carbohydrate content of the test meals, especially in meals with higher carbohydrate content. Repetition of estimation resulted in significant improvements in estimation accuracy and is important for the maintenance of correct carbohydrate estimations. The ability to estimate the carbohydrate content of a meal should be checked and trained regularly in patients with diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12241,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes","volume":"130 7","pages":"475-483"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Meal Carbohydrate Counting Errors in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Sina Buck,&nbsp;Collin Krauss,&nbsp;Delia Waldenmaier,&nbsp;Christina Liebing,&nbsp;Nina Jendrike,&nbsp;Josef Högel,&nbsp;Boris M Pfeiffer,&nbsp;Cornelia Haug,&nbsp;Guido Freckmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-1493-2324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Correct estimation of meal carbohydrate content is a prerequisite for successful intensified insulin therapy in patients with diabetes. In this survey, the counting error in adult patients with type 1 diabetes was investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-four patients with type 1 diabetes estimated the carbohydrate content of 24 standardized test meals. The test meals were categorized into 1 of 3 groups with different carbohydrate content: low, medium, and high. Estimation results were compared with the meals' actual carbohydrate content as determined by calculation based on weighing. A subgroup of the participants estimated the test meals for a second (n=35) and a third time (n=22) with a mean period of 11 months between the estimations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the first estimation, the carbohydrate content was underestimated by -28% (-50, 0) of the actual carbohydrate content. Particularly meals with high mean carbohydrate content were underestimated by -34% (-56, -13). Median counting error improved significantly when estimations were performed for a second time (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants generally underestimated the carbohydrate content of the test meals, especially in meals with higher carbohydrate content. Repetition of estimation resulted in significant improvements in estimation accuracy and is important for the maintenance of correct carbohydrate estimations. The ability to estimate the carbohydrate content of a meal should be checked and trained regularly in patients with diabetes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes\",\"volume\":\"130 7\",\"pages\":\"475-483\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1493-2324\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/5/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1493-2324","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的:正确估计膳食碳水化合物含量是糖尿病患者胰岛素强化治疗成功的前提。本调查对成人1型糖尿病患者的计数误差进行了调查。方法:74例1型糖尿病患者对24份标准化试验餐的碳水化合物含量进行估算。试验餐按碳水化合物含量分为三组:低、中、高。将估算结果与根据称重计算确定的膳食实际碳水化合物含量进行比较。另一组参与者对测试餐进行了第二次(n=35)和第三次(n=22)评估,两次评估之间的平均间隔为11个月。结果:在第一次估算时,碳水化合物含量被低估了实际碳水化合物含量的-28%(- 50,0)。特别是平均碳水化合物含量高的食物被低估了-34%(-56,-13)。当第二次进行估计时,中位数计数误差显著改善(结论:参与者通常低估了测试餐的碳水化合物含量,特别是在碳水化合物含量较高的餐中。)重复估算可显著提高估算精度,对维持正确的碳水化合物估算非常重要。糖尿病患者估计一餐碳水化合物含量的能力应定期检查和训练。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Meal Carbohydrate Counting Errors in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes.

Aim: Correct estimation of meal carbohydrate content is a prerequisite for successful intensified insulin therapy in patients with diabetes. In this survey, the counting error in adult patients with type 1 diabetes was investigated.

Methods: Seventy-four patients with type 1 diabetes estimated the carbohydrate content of 24 standardized test meals. The test meals were categorized into 1 of 3 groups with different carbohydrate content: low, medium, and high. Estimation results were compared with the meals' actual carbohydrate content as determined by calculation based on weighing. A subgroup of the participants estimated the test meals for a second (n=35) and a third time (n=22) with a mean period of 11 months between the estimations.

Results: During the first estimation, the carbohydrate content was underestimated by -28% (-50, 0) of the actual carbohydrate content. Particularly meals with high mean carbohydrate content were underestimated by -34% (-56, -13). Median counting error improved significantly when estimations were performed for a second time (p<0.001).

Conclusions: Participants generally underestimated the carbohydrate content of the test meals, especially in meals with higher carbohydrate content. Repetition of estimation resulted in significant improvements in estimation accuracy and is important for the maintenance of correct carbohydrate estimations. The ability to estimate the carbohydrate content of a meal should be checked and trained regularly in patients with diabetes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
72
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Publishing outstanding articles from all fields of endocrinology and diabetology, from molecular biology to clinical research, this journal is a brilliant resource. Since being published in English in 1983, the popularity of this journal has grown steadily, reflecting the importance of this publication within its field. Original contributions and short communications appear in each issue along with reviews addressing current topics. In addition, supplementary issues are published each year presenting abstracts or proceedings of national and international scientific meetings. The journal was initially published in German and is still the oldest endocrinological periodical in the German-language market!
期刊最新文献
Polymorphism in the Drug Transporter Gene ABCB1 as a Potential Disease Modifier in Cortisol-Producing Adrenal Adenomas Activation of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Receptor in Adrenal Zona Fasciculata Cells Promotes Cortisol Secretion: Implications for the Development of Menopause-Associated Diseases Obstructive sleep apnoea and type 1 diabetes mellitus: A neglected relationship? Association Between Liver Fibrosis Score and Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study of Hospitalized Patients Glycoprotein Non-Metastatic Protein B (GPNMB): The Missing Link Between Lysosomes and Obesity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1