心理学定性访谈与社会变迁研究:世代研究中的性认同发展、少数族群压力与健康。

IF 11.7 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Qualitative psychology (Washington, D.C.) Pub Date : 2020-10-01 Epub Date: 2019-10-10 DOI:10.1037/qup0000148
David M Frost, Phillip L Hammack, Bianca D M Wilson, Stephen T Russell, Marguerita Lightfoot, Ilan H Meyer
{"title":"心理学定性访谈与社会变迁研究:世代研究中的性认同发展、少数族群压力与健康。","authors":"David M Frost,&nbsp;Phillip L Hammack,&nbsp;Bianca D M Wilson,&nbsp;Stephen T Russell,&nbsp;Marguerita Lightfoot,&nbsp;Ilan H Meyer","doi":"10.1037/qup0000148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interviewing is considered a key form of qualitative inquiry in psychology that yields rich data on lived experience and meaning making of life events. Interviews that contain multiple components informed by specific epistemologies have the potential to provide particularly nuanced perspectives on psychological experience. We offer a methodological model for a multi-component interview that draws upon both pragmatic and constructivist epistemologies to examine generational differences in the experience of identity development, stress, and health among contemporary sexual minorities in the United States. Grounded in theories of life course, narrative, and intersectionality, we designed and implemented a multi-component protocol that was administered among a diverse sample of three generations of sexual minority individuals. For each component, we describe the purpose and utility, underlying epistemology, foundational psychological approach, and procedure, and we provide illustrative data from interviewees. We discuss procedures undertaken to ensure methodological integrity in process of data collection, illustrating the implementation of recent guidelines for qualitative inquiry in psychology. We highlight the utility of this qualitative multi-component interview to examine the way in which sexual minorities of distinct generations have made meaning of significant social change over the past half-century.</p>","PeriodicalId":92131,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative psychology (Washington, D.C.)","volume":"7 3","pages":"245-266"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8172075/pdf/nihms-1566033.pdf","citationCount":"46","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Qualitative Interview in Psychology and the Study of Social Change: Sexual Identity Development, Minority Stress, and Health in the Generations Study.\",\"authors\":\"David M Frost,&nbsp;Phillip L Hammack,&nbsp;Bianca D M Wilson,&nbsp;Stephen T Russell,&nbsp;Marguerita Lightfoot,&nbsp;Ilan H Meyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/qup0000148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Interviewing is considered a key form of qualitative inquiry in psychology that yields rich data on lived experience and meaning making of life events. Interviews that contain multiple components informed by specific epistemologies have the potential to provide particularly nuanced perspectives on psychological experience. We offer a methodological model for a multi-component interview that draws upon both pragmatic and constructivist epistemologies to examine generational differences in the experience of identity development, stress, and health among contemporary sexual minorities in the United States. Grounded in theories of life course, narrative, and intersectionality, we designed and implemented a multi-component protocol that was administered among a diverse sample of three generations of sexual minority individuals. For each component, we describe the purpose and utility, underlying epistemology, foundational psychological approach, and procedure, and we provide illustrative data from interviewees. We discuss procedures undertaken to ensure methodological integrity in process of data collection, illustrating the implementation of recent guidelines for qualitative inquiry in psychology. We highlight the utility of this qualitative multi-component interview to examine the way in which sexual minorities of distinct generations have made meaning of significant social change over the past half-century.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":92131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Qualitative psychology (Washington, D.C.)\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"245-266\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8172075/pdf/nihms-1566033.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"46\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Qualitative psychology (Washington, D.C.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000148\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/10/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative psychology (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

摘要

访谈被认为是心理学中定性调查的一种关键形式,它可以产生关于生活经历和生活事件意义的丰富数据。包含由特定认识论提供信息的多个组成部分的访谈有可能提供关于心理体验的特别细微的观点。我们提供了一个多成分访谈的方法论模型,利用实用主义和建构主义认识论来研究美国当代性少数群体在身份发展、压力和健康方面的代际差异。在生命历程、叙事和交叉性理论的基础上,我们设计并实施了一个多组件协议,该协议在三代性少数个体的不同样本中进行管理。对于每个组成部分,我们描述了目的和效用、潜在的认识论、基本心理学方法和程序,并提供了来自受访者的说明性数据。我们讨论了在数据收集过程中为确保方法完整性而采取的程序,说明了最近在心理学中进行定性调查的指导方针的实施。我们强调了这种定性多成分访谈的效用,以检查不同世代的性少数群体在过去半个世纪中对重大社会变革的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Qualitative Interview in Psychology and the Study of Social Change: Sexual Identity Development, Minority Stress, and Health in the Generations Study.

Interviewing is considered a key form of qualitative inquiry in psychology that yields rich data on lived experience and meaning making of life events. Interviews that contain multiple components informed by specific epistemologies have the potential to provide particularly nuanced perspectives on psychological experience. We offer a methodological model for a multi-component interview that draws upon both pragmatic and constructivist epistemologies to examine generational differences in the experience of identity development, stress, and health among contemporary sexual minorities in the United States. Grounded in theories of life course, narrative, and intersectionality, we designed and implemented a multi-component protocol that was administered among a diverse sample of three generations of sexual minority individuals. For each component, we describe the purpose and utility, underlying epistemology, foundational psychological approach, and procedure, and we provide illustrative data from interviewees. We discuss procedures undertaken to ensure methodological integrity in process of data collection, illustrating the implementation of recent guidelines for qualitative inquiry in psychology. We highlight the utility of this qualitative multi-component interview to examine the way in which sexual minorities of distinct generations have made meaning of significant social change over the past half-century.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Qualitative Interview in Psychology and the Study of Social Change: Sexual Identity Development, Minority Stress, and Health in the Generations Study. Evaluating the Interpersonal-Psychological Theory of Suicide among Latina Adolescents using Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Is It Time to Share Qualitative Research Data? How Qualitative Methods Contribute to Intervention Adaptation: An HIV Risk Reduction Example. An account from the inside: Examining the emotional impact of qualitative research through the lens of "insider" research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1