当轻微的不安全感投射出巨大的阴影:认知和情感工作不安全感的概况分析。

IF 5.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Journal of Occupational Health Psychology Pub Date : 2021-10-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-29 DOI:10.1037/ocp0000294
Anthony Naranjo, Mindy Shoss, Alissa Gebben, Michael DiStaso, Shiyang Su
{"title":"当轻微的不安全感投射出巨大的阴影:认知和情感工作不安全感的概况分析。","authors":"Anthony Naranjo,&nbsp;Mindy Shoss,&nbsp;Alissa Gebben,&nbsp;Michael DiStaso,&nbsp;Shiyang Su","doi":"10.1037/ocp0000294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People are generally thought to worry about potential job loss to the extent to which they view job loss as likely to occur. However, might there be some individuals for whom job loss may be so detrimental that they experience high levels of worry even if they view job loss as less likely? To answer this question, the present study leveraged research on future-oriented cognition to investigate profiles of cognitive and affective job insecurity (JI). We examined how economic job dependency relates to different profiles of JI experiences as well as the implications of these profiles for understanding heterogeneity in work strain. Latent profile analysis using the U.S. International Social Survey Program data set, and replicated in the U.K. data set, revealed three profiles: Employees who are secure in their role and do not worry about potential job loss (secure alignment profile), those who worry significantly about job loss despite perceiving minimal job threats (affective JI misalignment profile), and employees who worry to some extent and perceive minimal job threats (ambivalent JI alignment profile). As anticipated, several economic job dependence factors (perceived employability and education) were predictors of profile membership. Further, those in the affective JI misalignment profile reported the greatest amount of strain. We discuss our results in terms of implications for JI theory and organizational practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Health Psychology","volume":"26 5","pages":"421-436"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8817671/pdf/nihms-1729459.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When minor insecurities project large shadows: A profile analysis of cognitive and affective job insecurity.\",\"authors\":\"Anthony Naranjo,&nbsp;Mindy Shoss,&nbsp;Alissa Gebben,&nbsp;Michael DiStaso,&nbsp;Shiyang Su\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/ocp0000294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>People are generally thought to worry about potential job loss to the extent to which they view job loss as likely to occur. However, might there be some individuals for whom job loss may be so detrimental that they experience high levels of worry even if they view job loss as less likely? To answer this question, the present study leveraged research on future-oriented cognition to investigate profiles of cognitive and affective job insecurity (JI). We examined how economic job dependency relates to different profiles of JI experiences as well as the implications of these profiles for understanding heterogeneity in work strain. Latent profile analysis using the U.S. International Social Survey Program data set, and replicated in the U.K. data set, revealed three profiles: Employees who are secure in their role and do not worry about potential job loss (secure alignment profile), those who worry significantly about job loss despite perceiving minimal job threats (affective JI misalignment profile), and employees who worry to some extent and perceive minimal job threats (ambivalent JI alignment profile). As anticipated, several economic job dependence factors (perceived employability and education) were predictors of profile membership. Further, those in the affective JI misalignment profile reported the greatest amount of strain. We discuss our results in terms of implications for JI theory and organizational practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Occupational Health Psychology\",\"volume\":\"26 5\",\"pages\":\"421-436\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8817671/pdf/nihms-1729459.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Occupational Health Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000294\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/7/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000294","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

一般认为,人们对潜在失业的担忧程度是他们认为失业可能发生的程度。然而,对于某些人来说,失业可能是非常有害的,即使他们认为失业的可能性很小,他们也会感到高度担忧吗?为了回答这一问题,本研究利用面向未来的认知研究来调查认知和情感工作不安全感(JI)的概况。我们研究了经济工作依赖与不同类型的JI经历之间的关系,以及这些特征对理解工作压力异质性的影响。利用美国国际社会调查项目(International Social Survey Program)的数据集,并在英国的数据集上进行了潜在特征分析,揭示了三种特征:对自己的角色感到安全且不担心潜在失业的员工(安全一致性特征),尽管感知到最小的工作威胁却对失业感到非常担忧的员工(情感JI错位特征),以及在一定程度上担心并感知到最小的工作威胁的员工(矛盾型JI一致性特征)。正如预期的那样,几个经济工作依赖因素(感知就业能力和教育)是概况成员的预测因素。此外,那些在情感JI错位档案报告最大的应变量。我们从JI理论和组织实践的意义方面讨论了我们的结果。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
When minor insecurities project large shadows: A profile analysis of cognitive and affective job insecurity.

People are generally thought to worry about potential job loss to the extent to which they view job loss as likely to occur. However, might there be some individuals for whom job loss may be so detrimental that they experience high levels of worry even if they view job loss as less likely? To answer this question, the present study leveraged research on future-oriented cognition to investigate profiles of cognitive and affective job insecurity (JI). We examined how economic job dependency relates to different profiles of JI experiences as well as the implications of these profiles for understanding heterogeneity in work strain. Latent profile analysis using the U.S. International Social Survey Program data set, and replicated in the U.K. data set, revealed three profiles: Employees who are secure in their role and do not worry about potential job loss (secure alignment profile), those who worry significantly about job loss despite perceiving minimal job threats (affective JI misalignment profile), and employees who worry to some extent and perceive minimal job threats (ambivalent JI alignment profile). As anticipated, several economic job dependence factors (perceived employability and education) were predictors of profile membership. Further, those in the affective JI misalignment profile reported the greatest amount of strain. We discuss our results in terms of implications for JI theory and organizational practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Journal of Occupational Health Psychology offers research, theory, and public policy articles in occupational health psychology, an interdisciplinary field representing a broad range of backgrounds, interests, and specializations. Occupational health psychology concerns the application of psychology to improving the quality of work life and to protecting and promoting the safety, health, and well-being of workers. This journal focuses on the work environment, the individual, and the work-family interface.
期刊最新文献
Proactive employees perceive coworker ostracism: The moderating effect of team envy and the behavioral outcome of production deviance. Supportive-leadership training to improve social connection: A cluster-randomized trial demonstrating efficacy in a high-risk occupational context. A daily exercise prescription when work gets tough: The moderating effect of work demands on the relationship between daily physical exercise and next-day well-being and job performance. Family intergenerational stress: Concept exploration and development via coping and identity management. Financial stress and leadership behavior: The role of leader gender.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1