Anthony Naranjo, Mindy Shoss, Alissa Gebben, Michael DiStaso, Shiyang Su
{"title":"当轻微的不安全感投射出巨大的阴影:认知和情感工作不安全感的概况分析。","authors":"Anthony Naranjo, Mindy Shoss, Alissa Gebben, Michael DiStaso, Shiyang Su","doi":"10.1037/ocp0000294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People are generally thought to worry about potential job loss to the extent to which they view job loss as likely to occur. However, might there be some individuals for whom job loss may be so detrimental that they experience high levels of worry even if they view job loss as less likely? To answer this question, the present study leveraged research on future-oriented cognition to investigate profiles of cognitive and affective job insecurity (JI). We examined how economic job dependency relates to different profiles of JI experiences as well as the implications of these profiles for understanding heterogeneity in work strain. Latent profile analysis using the U.S. International Social Survey Program data set, and replicated in the U.K. data set, revealed three profiles: Employees who are secure in their role and do not worry about potential job loss (secure alignment profile), those who worry significantly about job loss despite perceiving minimal job threats (affective JI misalignment profile), and employees who worry to some extent and perceive minimal job threats (ambivalent JI alignment profile). As anticipated, several economic job dependence factors (perceived employability and education) were predictors of profile membership. Further, those in the affective JI misalignment profile reported the greatest amount of strain. We discuss our results in terms of implications for JI theory and organizational practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Health Psychology","volume":"26 5","pages":"421-436"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8817671/pdf/nihms-1729459.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When minor insecurities project large shadows: A profile analysis of cognitive and affective job insecurity.\",\"authors\":\"Anthony Naranjo, Mindy Shoss, Alissa Gebben, Michael DiStaso, Shiyang Su\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/ocp0000294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>People are generally thought to worry about potential job loss to the extent to which they view job loss as likely to occur. However, might there be some individuals for whom job loss may be so detrimental that they experience high levels of worry even if they view job loss as less likely? To answer this question, the present study leveraged research on future-oriented cognition to investigate profiles of cognitive and affective job insecurity (JI). We examined how economic job dependency relates to different profiles of JI experiences as well as the implications of these profiles for understanding heterogeneity in work strain. Latent profile analysis using the U.S. International Social Survey Program data set, and replicated in the U.K. data set, revealed three profiles: Employees who are secure in their role and do not worry about potential job loss (secure alignment profile), those who worry significantly about job loss despite perceiving minimal job threats (affective JI misalignment profile), and employees who worry to some extent and perceive minimal job threats (ambivalent JI alignment profile). As anticipated, several economic job dependence factors (perceived employability and education) were predictors of profile membership. Further, those in the affective JI misalignment profile reported the greatest amount of strain. We discuss our results in terms of implications for JI theory and organizational practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Occupational Health Psychology\",\"volume\":\"26 5\",\"pages\":\"421-436\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8817671/pdf/nihms-1729459.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Occupational Health Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000294\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/7/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000294","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
一般认为,人们对潜在失业的担忧程度是他们认为失业可能发生的程度。然而,对于某些人来说,失业可能是非常有害的,即使他们认为失业的可能性很小,他们也会感到高度担忧吗?为了回答这一问题,本研究利用面向未来的认知研究来调查认知和情感工作不安全感(JI)的概况。我们研究了经济工作依赖与不同类型的JI经历之间的关系,以及这些特征对理解工作压力异质性的影响。利用美国国际社会调查项目(International Social Survey Program)的数据集,并在英国的数据集上进行了潜在特征分析,揭示了三种特征:对自己的角色感到安全且不担心潜在失业的员工(安全一致性特征),尽管感知到最小的工作威胁却对失业感到非常担忧的员工(情感JI错位特征),以及在一定程度上担心并感知到最小的工作威胁的员工(矛盾型JI一致性特征)。正如预期的那样,几个经济工作依赖因素(感知就业能力和教育)是概况成员的预测因素。此外,那些在情感JI错位档案报告最大的应变量。我们从JI理论和组织实践的意义方面讨论了我们的结果。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA,版权所有)。
When minor insecurities project large shadows: A profile analysis of cognitive and affective job insecurity.
People are generally thought to worry about potential job loss to the extent to which they view job loss as likely to occur. However, might there be some individuals for whom job loss may be so detrimental that they experience high levels of worry even if they view job loss as less likely? To answer this question, the present study leveraged research on future-oriented cognition to investigate profiles of cognitive and affective job insecurity (JI). We examined how economic job dependency relates to different profiles of JI experiences as well as the implications of these profiles for understanding heterogeneity in work strain. Latent profile analysis using the U.S. International Social Survey Program data set, and replicated in the U.K. data set, revealed three profiles: Employees who are secure in their role and do not worry about potential job loss (secure alignment profile), those who worry significantly about job loss despite perceiving minimal job threats (affective JI misalignment profile), and employees who worry to some extent and perceive minimal job threats (ambivalent JI alignment profile). As anticipated, several economic job dependence factors (perceived employability and education) were predictors of profile membership. Further, those in the affective JI misalignment profile reported the greatest amount of strain. We discuss our results in terms of implications for JI theory and organizational practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Journal of Occupational Health Psychology offers research, theory, and public policy articles in occupational health psychology, an interdisciplinary field representing a broad range of backgrounds, interests, and specializations. Occupational health psychology concerns the application of psychology to improving the quality of work life and to protecting and promoting the safety, health, and well-being of workers. This journal focuses on the work environment, the individual, and the work-family interface.