小儿烟雾病患者的安静弥散加权脑磁共振成像。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-30 DOI:10.2463/mrms.mp.2020-0174
Satoshi Nakajima, Yasutaka Fushimi, Takeshi Funaki, Gosuke Okubo, Akihiko Sakata, Takuya Hinoda, Yusuke Yokota, Sonoko Oshima, Sayo Otani, Takayuki Kikuchi, Tomohisa Okada, Kazumichi Yoshida, Susumu Miyamoto, Yuji Nakamoto
{"title":"小儿烟雾病患者的安静弥散加权脑磁共振成像。","authors":"Satoshi Nakajima,&nbsp;Yasutaka Fushimi,&nbsp;Takeshi Funaki,&nbsp;Gosuke Okubo,&nbsp;Akihiko Sakata,&nbsp;Takuya Hinoda,&nbsp;Yusuke Yokota,&nbsp;Sonoko Oshima,&nbsp;Sayo Otani,&nbsp;Takayuki Kikuchi,&nbsp;Tomohisa Okada,&nbsp;Kazumichi Yoshida,&nbsp;Susumu Miyamoto,&nbsp;Yuji Nakamoto","doi":"10.2463/mrms.mp.2020-0174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) is an essential sequence for evaluating pediatric patients with moyamoya disease (MMD); however, acoustic noise associated with DWI may lead to motion artifact. Compared with conventional DWI (cDWI), quiet DWI (qDWI) is considered less noisy and able to keep children more relaxed and stable. This study aimed to evaluate the suitability of qDWI compared with cDWI for pediatric patients with MMD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this observational study, MR examinations of the brain were performed either with or without sedation in pediatric patients with MMD between September 2017 and August 2018. Three neuroradiologists independently evaluated the images for artifacts and restricted diffusion in the brain. The differences between qDWI and cDWI were compared statistically using a chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-hundred and six MR scans of 56 patients with MMD (38 scans of 15 sedated patients: 6 boys and 9 girls; mean age, 5.2 years; range, 1-9 years; and 68 scans of 42 unsedated patients: 19 boys and 23 girls; mean age, 10.7 years; range, 7-16 years) were evaluated. MR examinations were performed either with or without sedation (except in one patient). In sedated patients, no artifact other than susceptibility was observed on qDWI, whereas four artifacts were observed on cDWI (P = .04). One patient awoke from sedation during cDWI scanning, while no patient awoke from sedation during qDWI acquisition. For unsedated patients, three scans showed artifacts on qDWI, whereas two scans showed artifacts on cDWI (P = .65). Regarding restricted diffusion, qDWI revealed three cases, while two cases were found on cDWI (P = .66).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>qDWI induced fewer artifacts compared with cDWI in sedated patients, and similar frequencies of artifacts were induced by qDWI and by cDWI in unsedated patients. qDWI showed restricted diffusion comparable to cDWI.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"21 4","pages":"583-591"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9d/c6/mrms-21-583.PMC9618925.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quiet Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging of the Brain for Pediatric Patients with Moyamoya Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Satoshi Nakajima,&nbsp;Yasutaka Fushimi,&nbsp;Takeshi Funaki,&nbsp;Gosuke Okubo,&nbsp;Akihiko Sakata,&nbsp;Takuya Hinoda,&nbsp;Yusuke Yokota,&nbsp;Sonoko Oshima,&nbsp;Sayo Otani,&nbsp;Takayuki Kikuchi,&nbsp;Tomohisa Okada,&nbsp;Kazumichi Yoshida,&nbsp;Susumu Miyamoto,&nbsp;Yuji Nakamoto\",\"doi\":\"10.2463/mrms.mp.2020-0174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) is an essential sequence for evaluating pediatric patients with moyamoya disease (MMD); however, acoustic noise associated with DWI may lead to motion artifact. Compared with conventional DWI (cDWI), quiet DWI (qDWI) is considered less noisy and able to keep children more relaxed and stable. This study aimed to evaluate the suitability of qDWI compared with cDWI for pediatric patients with MMD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this observational study, MR examinations of the brain were performed either with or without sedation in pediatric patients with MMD between September 2017 and August 2018. Three neuroradiologists independently evaluated the images for artifacts and restricted diffusion in the brain. The differences between qDWI and cDWI were compared statistically using a chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-hundred and six MR scans of 56 patients with MMD (38 scans of 15 sedated patients: 6 boys and 9 girls; mean age, 5.2 years; range, 1-9 years; and 68 scans of 42 unsedated patients: 19 boys and 23 girls; mean age, 10.7 years; range, 7-16 years) were evaluated. MR examinations were performed either with or without sedation (except in one patient). In sedated patients, no artifact other than susceptibility was observed on qDWI, whereas four artifacts were observed on cDWI (P = .04). One patient awoke from sedation during cDWI scanning, while no patient awoke from sedation during qDWI acquisition. For unsedated patients, three scans showed artifacts on qDWI, whereas two scans showed artifacts on cDWI (P = .65). Regarding restricted diffusion, qDWI revealed three cases, while two cases were found on cDWI (P = .66).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>qDWI induced fewer artifacts compared with cDWI in sedated patients, and similar frequencies of artifacts were induced by qDWI and by cDWI in unsedated patients. qDWI showed restricted diffusion comparable to cDWI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":\"21 4\",\"pages\":\"583-591\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9d/c6/mrms-21-583.PMC9618925.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2020-0174\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/7/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2020-0174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:弥散加权MRI (DWI)是评估儿童烟雾病(MMD)的必要序列;然而,与DWI相关的噪声可能导致运动伪影。与常规DWI (cDWI)相比,安静DWI (qDWI)被认为噪音较小,能够使儿童更放松和稳定。本研究旨在评价qDWI与cDWI在儿童烟雾病患者中的适用性。方法:在这项观察性研究中,在2017年9月至2018年8月期间,对患有烟雾病的儿科患者进行了脑部MR检查,无论镇静与否。三名神经放射学家独立评估了图像的伪影和大脑扩散受限。qDWI与cDWI的差异采用卡方检验进行统计学比较。结果:56例烟雾病患者的106次MR扫描(15例镇静患者的38次扫描:6男9女;平均年龄5.2岁;范围:1-9年;对42名未服用镇静剂的病人进行68次扫描:19名男孩,23名女孩;平均年龄10.7岁;年龄范围7-16岁)。mri检查在镇静或不镇静的情况下进行(除1例患者外)。镇静患者在qDWI上除易感性外未观察到伪影,而在cDWI上观察到4个伪影(P = 0.04)。1例患者在cDWI扫描期间从镇静中醒来,而在qDWI采集期间没有患者从镇静中醒来。对于未服用镇静剂的患者,三次扫描显示qDWI伪影,而两次扫描显示cDWI伪影(P = 0.65)。弥散受限qDWI显示3例,cDWI显示2例(P = 0.66)。结论:与cDWI相比,镇静组qDWI诱导的伪影较少,未镇静组qDWI与cDWI诱导的伪影频率相似。与cDWI相比,qDWI显示扩散受限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quiet Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging of the Brain for Pediatric Patients with Moyamoya Disease.

Purpose: Diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) is an essential sequence for evaluating pediatric patients with moyamoya disease (MMD); however, acoustic noise associated with DWI may lead to motion artifact. Compared with conventional DWI (cDWI), quiet DWI (qDWI) is considered less noisy and able to keep children more relaxed and stable. This study aimed to evaluate the suitability of qDWI compared with cDWI for pediatric patients with MMD.

Methods: In this observational study, MR examinations of the brain were performed either with or without sedation in pediatric patients with MMD between September 2017 and August 2018. Three neuroradiologists independently evaluated the images for artifacts and restricted diffusion in the brain. The differences between qDWI and cDWI were compared statistically using a chi-square test.

Results: One-hundred and six MR scans of 56 patients with MMD (38 scans of 15 sedated patients: 6 boys and 9 girls; mean age, 5.2 years; range, 1-9 years; and 68 scans of 42 unsedated patients: 19 boys and 23 girls; mean age, 10.7 years; range, 7-16 years) were evaluated. MR examinations were performed either with or without sedation (except in one patient). In sedated patients, no artifact other than susceptibility was observed on qDWI, whereas four artifacts were observed on cDWI (P = .04). One patient awoke from sedation during cDWI scanning, while no patient awoke from sedation during qDWI acquisition. For unsedated patients, three scans showed artifacts on qDWI, whereas two scans showed artifacts on cDWI (P = .65). Regarding restricted diffusion, qDWI revealed three cases, while two cases were found on cDWI (P = .66).

Conclusion: qDWI induced fewer artifacts compared with cDWI in sedated patients, and similar frequencies of artifacts were induced by qDWI and by cDWI in unsedated patients. qDWI showed restricted diffusion comparable to cDWI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1