Emily W Baird, Colleen M Reid, Leopoldo C Cancio, Jennifer M Gurney, David M Burmeister
{"title":"一个案例研究表明,在烧伤休克中,肠道对大量肠内液体作为静脉液体复苏的补充具有耐受性。","authors":"Emily W Baird, Colleen M Reid, Leopoldo C Cancio, Jennifer M Gurney, David M Burmeister","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Appropriate intravenous fluid resuscitation has improved early post burn outcomes. However, clinical and pre-clinical evidence suggests that enteral or oral resuscitation may complement intravenous fluid administration. While this strategy is often discussed in the context of resource-limited settings, its implementation could reduce overall IV fluid requirements and simplify management during routine care. Conversely, concerns about this strategy have been raised over impaired gut perfusion and function leading to adverse effects. We present a case of an 82-year-old man with a total burn size of 14% who was encouraged to ingest the oral rehydration solution Drip Drop® starting 7 hours post-burn. In the ensuing 17 hours he consumed over 5 L of oral rehydration solution, which was nearly 1 L more than the total amount of IV fluids he received. There were no adverse gastrointestinal side effects. This demonstrates tolerance of a significant volume of voluntary oral fluids in combination with IV resuscitation. Clinical trials are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":45488,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8310868/pdf/ijbt0011-0202.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A case study demonstrating tolerance of the gut to large volumes of enteral fluids as a complement to IV fluid resuscitation in burn shock.\",\"authors\":\"Emily W Baird, Colleen M Reid, Leopoldo C Cancio, Jennifer M Gurney, David M Burmeister\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Appropriate intravenous fluid resuscitation has improved early post burn outcomes. However, clinical and pre-clinical evidence suggests that enteral or oral resuscitation may complement intravenous fluid administration. While this strategy is often discussed in the context of resource-limited settings, its implementation could reduce overall IV fluid requirements and simplify management during routine care. Conversely, concerns about this strategy have been raised over impaired gut perfusion and function leading to adverse effects. We present a case of an 82-year-old man with a total burn size of 14% who was encouraged to ingest the oral rehydration solution Drip Drop® starting 7 hours post-burn. In the ensuing 17 hours he consumed over 5 L of oral rehydration solution, which was nearly 1 L more than the total amount of IV fluids he received. There were no adverse gastrointestinal side effects. This demonstrates tolerance of a significant volume of voluntary oral fluids in combination with IV resuscitation. Clinical trials are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Burns and Trauma\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8310868/pdf/ijbt0011-0202.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Burns and Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
A case study demonstrating tolerance of the gut to large volumes of enteral fluids as a complement to IV fluid resuscitation in burn shock.
Appropriate intravenous fluid resuscitation has improved early post burn outcomes. However, clinical and pre-clinical evidence suggests that enteral or oral resuscitation may complement intravenous fluid administration. While this strategy is often discussed in the context of resource-limited settings, its implementation could reduce overall IV fluid requirements and simplify management during routine care. Conversely, concerns about this strategy have been raised over impaired gut perfusion and function leading to adverse effects. We present a case of an 82-year-old man with a total burn size of 14% who was encouraged to ingest the oral rehydration solution Drip Drop® starting 7 hours post-burn. In the ensuing 17 hours he consumed over 5 L of oral rehydration solution, which was nearly 1 L more than the total amount of IV fluids he received. There were no adverse gastrointestinal side effects. This demonstrates tolerance of a significant volume of voluntary oral fluids in combination with IV resuscitation. Clinical trials are warranted.