Piotr Kanclerz, Katarzyna Przewłócka, Xiaogang Wang
{"title":"角膜屈光和白内障屈光手术中重要数据参数的设备间测量变异性。","authors":"Piotr Kanclerz, Katarzyna Przewłócka, Xiaogang Wang","doi":"10.1177/25158414211045750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The measurements of corneal white-to-white (WTW) diameter and pupil size are critical for decision making in refractive surgery. Currently, automatic measurement of keratometry, corneal WTW, and pupil size are implemented in several ocular devices. The purpose of this study was to examine the agreement between two commonly used devices, an autorefractor and an optical biometer, for these parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Measurements were performed with both a Lenstar LS-900 and Nidek ARK-1 by an experienced examiner in random order. The devices were placed in close proximity within the same dimly lit room.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The measurements of 65 right eyes were analyzed. The results of the flat, steep, and mean keratometric reading were not significantly different (<i>p</i> = 0.96, <i>p</i> = 0.90, <i>p</i> = 0.93, respectively). Corneal WTW distances showed only moderate agreement between devices and were found to be significantly different (<i>r</i> = 0.8071; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Pupil diameters showed poor agreement between devices and were significantly different (<i>r</i> = 0.4890; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Agreement between implantable contact lens sizing, based on the measurements obtained by the two devices, was achieved for 19 of the 51 eyes (37.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found a significant difference in WTW and pupil size measurements between ARK-1 and Lenstar. Results for both of the devices cannot be considered interchangeable for these data parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":23054,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology","volume":"13 ","pages":"25158414211045750"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/53/83/10.1177_25158414211045750.PMC8458669.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inter-device measurement variability of vital data parameters for keratorefractive and cataract refractive surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Piotr Kanclerz, Katarzyna Przewłócka, Xiaogang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/25158414211045750\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The measurements of corneal white-to-white (WTW) diameter and pupil size are critical for decision making in refractive surgery. Currently, automatic measurement of keratometry, corneal WTW, and pupil size are implemented in several ocular devices. The purpose of this study was to examine the agreement between two commonly used devices, an autorefractor and an optical biometer, for these parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Measurements were performed with both a Lenstar LS-900 and Nidek ARK-1 by an experienced examiner in random order. The devices were placed in close proximity within the same dimly lit room.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The measurements of 65 right eyes were analyzed. The results of the flat, steep, and mean keratometric reading were not significantly different (<i>p</i> = 0.96, <i>p</i> = 0.90, <i>p</i> = 0.93, respectively). Corneal WTW distances showed only moderate agreement between devices and were found to be significantly different (<i>r</i> = 0.8071; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Pupil diameters showed poor agreement between devices and were significantly different (<i>r</i> = 0.4890; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Agreement between implantable contact lens sizing, based on the measurements obtained by the two devices, was achieved for 19 of the 51 eyes (37.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found a significant difference in WTW and pupil size measurements between ARK-1 and Lenstar. Results for both of the devices cannot be considered interchangeable for these data parameters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"25158414211045750\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/53/83/10.1177_25158414211045750.PMC8458669.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/25158414211045750\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25158414211045750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
角膜白对白(WTW)直径和瞳孔大小的测量是屈光手术决策的关键。目前,自动测量角膜度数、角膜WTW和瞳孔大小已在几种眼具中实现。本研究的目的是检查两种常用设备,自动折射器和光学生物计之间的协议,为这些参数。方法:由经验丰富的检查员按随机顺序使用Lenstar LS-900和Nidek ARK-1进行测量。这些装置被放置在同一个灯光昏暗的房间里,距离很近。结果:分析了65只右眼的测量结果。平、陡、平均角膜度数无显著差异(p = 0.96, p = 0.90, p = 0.93)。角膜WTW距离在不同装置之间只有中等程度的一致性,存在显著差异(r = 0.8071;p r = 0.4890;结论:我们发现ARK-1和Lenstar在WTW和瞳孔尺寸测量上有显著差异。对于这些数据参数,两种设备的结果不能被认为是可互换的。
Inter-device measurement variability of vital data parameters for keratorefractive and cataract refractive surgery.
Introduction: The measurements of corneal white-to-white (WTW) diameter and pupil size are critical for decision making in refractive surgery. Currently, automatic measurement of keratometry, corneal WTW, and pupil size are implemented in several ocular devices. The purpose of this study was to examine the agreement between two commonly used devices, an autorefractor and an optical biometer, for these parameters.
Methods: Measurements were performed with both a Lenstar LS-900 and Nidek ARK-1 by an experienced examiner in random order. The devices were placed in close proximity within the same dimly lit room.
Results: The measurements of 65 right eyes were analyzed. The results of the flat, steep, and mean keratometric reading were not significantly different (p = 0.96, p = 0.90, p = 0.93, respectively). Corneal WTW distances showed only moderate agreement between devices and were found to be significantly different (r = 0.8071; p < 0.01). Pupil diameters showed poor agreement between devices and were significantly different (r = 0.4890; p < 0.01). Agreement between implantable contact lens sizing, based on the measurements obtained by the two devices, was achieved for 19 of the 51 eyes (37.3%).
Conclusion: We found a significant difference in WTW and pupil size measurements between ARK-1 and Lenstar. Results for both of the devices cannot be considered interchangeable for these data parameters.