角膜屈光和白内障屈光手术中重要数据参数的设备间测量变异性。

IF 2.3 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2021-09-20 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1177/25158414211045750
Piotr Kanclerz, Katarzyna Przewłócka, Xiaogang Wang
{"title":"角膜屈光和白内障屈光手术中重要数据参数的设备间测量变异性。","authors":"Piotr Kanclerz,&nbsp;Katarzyna Przewłócka,&nbsp;Xiaogang Wang","doi":"10.1177/25158414211045750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The measurements of corneal white-to-white (WTW) diameter and pupil size are critical for decision making in refractive surgery. Currently, automatic measurement of keratometry, corneal WTW, and pupil size are implemented in several ocular devices. The purpose of this study was to examine the agreement between two commonly used devices, an autorefractor and an optical biometer, for these parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Measurements were performed with both a Lenstar LS-900 and Nidek ARK-1 by an experienced examiner in random order. The devices were placed in close proximity within the same dimly lit room.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The measurements of 65 right eyes were analyzed. The results of the flat, steep, and mean keratometric reading were not significantly different (<i>p</i> = 0.96, <i>p</i> = 0.90, <i>p</i> = 0.93, respectively). Corneal WTW distances showed only moderate agreement between devices and were found to be significantly different (<i>r</i> = 0.8071; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Pupil diameters showed poor agreement between devices and were significantly different (<i>r</i> = 0.4890; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Agreement between implantable contact lens sizing, based on the measurements obtained by the two devices, was achieved for 19 of the 51 eyes (37.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found a significant difference in WTW and pupil size measurements between ARK-1 and Lenstar. Results for both of the devices cannot be considered interchangeable for these data parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":23054,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology","volume":"13 ","pages":"25158414211045750"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/53/83/10.1177_25158414211045750.PMC8458669.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inter-device measurement variability of vital data parameters for keratorefractive and cataract refractive surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Piotr Kanclerz,&nbsp;Katarzyna Przewłócka,&nbsp;Xiaogang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/25158414211045750\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The measurements of corneal white-to-white (WTW) diameter and pupil size are critical for decision making in refractive surgery. Currently, automatic measurement of keratometry, corneal WTW, and pupil size are implemented in several ocular devices. The purpose of this study was to examine the agreement between two commonly used devices, an autorefractor and an optical biometer, for these parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Measurements were performed with both a Lenstar LS-900 and Nidek ARK-1 by an experienced examiner in random order. The devices were placed in close proximity within the same dimly lit room.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The measurements of 65 right eyes were analyzed. The results of the flat, steep, and mean keratometric reading were not significantly different (<i>p</i> = 0.96, <i>p</i> = 0.90, <i>p</i> = 0.93, respectively). Corneal WTW distances showed only moderate agreement between devices and were found to be significantly different (<i>r</i> = 0.8071; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Pupil diameters showed poor agreement between devices and were significantly different (<i>r</i> = 0.4890; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Agreement between implantable contact lens sizing, based on the measurements obtained by the two devices, was achieved for 19 of the 51 eyes (37.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found a significant difference in WTW and pupil size measurements between ARK-1 and Lenstar. Results for both of the devices cannot be considered interchangeable for these data parameters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"25158414211045750\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/53/83/10.1177_25158414211045750.PMC8458669.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/25158414211045750\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25158414211045750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

角膜白对白(WTW)直径和瞳孔大小的测量是屈光手术决策的关键。目前,自动测量角膜度数、角膜WTW和瞳孔大小已在几种眼具中实现。本研究的目的是检查两种常用设备,自动折射器和光学生物计之间的协议,为这些参数。方法:由经验丰富的检查员按随机顺序使用Lenstar LS-900和Nidek ARK-1进行测量。这些装置被放置在同一个灯光昏暗的房间里,距离很近。结果:分析了65只右眼的测量结果。平、陡、平均角膜度数无显著差异(p = 0.96, p = 0.90, p = 0.93)。角膜WTW距离在不同装置之间只有中等程度的一致性,存在显著差异(r = 0.8071;p r = 0.4890;结论:我们发现ARK-1和Lenstar在WTW和瞳孔尺寸测量上有显著差异。对于这些数据参数,两种设备的结果不能被认为是可互换的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inter-device measurement variability of vital data parameters for keratorefractive and cataract refractive surgery.

Introduction: The measurements of corneal white-to-white (WTW) diameter and pupil size are critical for decision making in refractive surgery. Currently, automatic measurement of keratometry, corneal WTW, and pupil size are implemented in several ocular devices. The purpose of this study was to examine the agreement between two commonly used devices, an autorefractor and an optical biometer, for these parameters.

Methods: Measurements were performed with both a Lenstar LS-900 and Nidek ARK-1 by an experienced examiner in random order. The devices were placed in close proximity within the same dimly lit room.

Results: The measurements of 65 right eyes were analyzed. The results of the flat, steep, and mean keratometric reading were not significantly different (p = 0.96, p = 0.90, p = 0.93, respectively). Corneal WTW distances showed only moderate agreement between devices and were found to be significantly different (r = 0.8071; p < 0.01). Pupil diameters showed poor agreement between devices and were significantly different (r = 0.4890; p < 0.01). Agreement between implantable contact lens sizing, based on the measurements obtained by the two devices, was achieved for 19 of the 51 eyes (37.3%).

Conclusion: We found a significant difference in WTW and pupil size measurements between ARK-1 and Lenstar. Results for both of the devices cannot be considered interchangeable for these data parameters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The efficacy and safety of continuous blanket suture for severe recurrent pterygium with symblepharon. The experiences of visually impaired military veterans with Charles Bonnet syndrome. Are depression, anxiety and loneliness associated with visual hallucinations in younger adults with Charles Bonnet syndrome? Clinical characteristics of allergic conjunctivitis in the Southern region of Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. Optical coherence tomography angiography to assess for retinal vascular changes in Neuro-Sjögren.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1