人员是否按照 INACSL 最佳实践标准进行模拟团队培训:一项定性访谈研究。

IF 2.8 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Advances in simulation (London, England) Pub Date : 2021-09-26 DOI:10.1186/s41077-021-00186-w
Anne Strand Finstad, Randi Ballangrud, Ingunn Aase, Torben Wisborg, Luis Georg Romundstad, Conrad Arnfinn Bjørshol
{"title":"人员是否按照 INACSL 最佳实践标准进行模拟团队培训:一项定性访谈研究。","authors":"Anne Strand Finstad, Randi Ballangrud, Ingunn Aase, Torben Wisborg, Luis Georg Romundstad, Conrad Arnfinn Bjørshol","doi":"10.1186/s41077-021-00186-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anesthesia personnel was among the first to implement simulation and team training including non-technical skills (NTS) in the field of healthcare. Within anesthesia practice, NTS are critically important in preventing harmful undesirable events. To our best knowledge, there has been little documentation of the extent to which anesthesia personnel uses recommended frameworks like the Standards of Best Practice: Simulation<sup>SM</sup> to guide simulation and thereby optimize learning. The aim of our study was to explore how anesthesia personnel in Norway conduct simulation-based team training (SBTT) with respect to outcomes and objectives, facilitation, debriefing, and participant evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individual qualitative interviews with healthcare professionals, with experience and responsible for SBTT in anesthesia, from 51 Norwegian public hospitals were conducted from August 2016 to October 2017. A qualitative deductive content analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of objectives and educated facilitators was common. All participants participated in debriefings, and almost all conducted evaluations, mainly formative. Preparedness, structure, and time available were pointed out as issues affecting SBTT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Anesthesia personnel's SBTT in this study met the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning (INACSL) Standard of Best Practice: Simulation<sup>SM</sup> framework to a certain extent with regard to objectives, facilitators' education and skills, debriefing, and participant evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72108,"journal":{"name":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","volume":"6 1","pages":"33"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8474884/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is simulation-based team training performed by personnel in accordance with the INACSL Standards of Best Practice: Simulation<sup>SM</sup>?-a qualitative interview study.\",\"authors\":\"Anne Strand Finstad, Randi Ballangrud, Ingunn Aase, Torben Wisborg, Luis Georg Romundstad, Conrad Arnfinn Bjørshol\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41077-021-00186-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anesthesia personnel was among the first to implement simulation and team training including non-technical skills (NTS) in the field of healthcare. Within anesthesia practice, NTS are critically important in preventing harmful undesirable events. To our best knowledge, there has been little documentation of the extent to which anesthesia personnel uses recommended frameworks like the Standards of Best Practice: Simulation<sup>SM</sup> to guide simulation and thereby optimize learning. The aim of our study was to explore how anesthesia personnel in Norway conduct simulation-based team training (SBTT) with respect to outcomes and objectives, facilitation, debriefing, and participant evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individual qualitative interviews with healthcare professionals, with experience and responsible for SBTT in anesthesia, from 51 Norwegian public hospitals were conducted from August 2016 to October 2017. A qualitative deductive content analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of objectives and educated facilitators was common. All participants participated in debriefings, and almost all conducted evaluations, mainly formative. Preparedness, structure, and time available were pointed out as issues affecting SBTT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Anesthesia personnel's SBTT in this study met the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning (INACSL) Standard of Best Practice: Simulation<sup>SM</sup> framework to a certain extent with regard to objectives, facilitators' education and skills, debriefing, and participant evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in simulation (London, England)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8474884/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in simulation (London, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-021-00186-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-021-00186-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:麻醉人员是最早在医疗保健领域开展包括非技术技能(NTS)在内的模拟和团队培训的人员之一。在麻醉实践中,NTS 对于预防有害的不良事件至关重要。据我们所知,关于麻醉人员在多大程度上使用《最佳实践标准》等推荐框架的文献很少:模拟SM》等推荐框架来指导模拟,从而优化学习的程度。我们的研究旨在探讨挪威麻醉人员如何在结果和目标、引导、汇报和参与者评估方面开展基于模拟的团队培训(SBTT):2016年8月至2017年10月,对挪威51家公立医院中具有麻醉模拟团队培训经验并负责该培训的医护人员进行了个人定性访谈。对访谈内容进行了定性演绎分析:使用目标和受过教育的促进者很常见。所有参与者都参加了汇报,几乎所有参与者都进行了评估,主要是形成性评估。准备情况、结构和可用时间被指出是影响 SBTT 的问题:本研究中麻醉人员的 SBTT 符合国际临床模拟与学习护理协会(INACSL)的最佳实践标准:结论:本研究中麻醉人员的 SBTT 在一定程度上符合国际临床模拟与学习护理协会(INACSL)的《最佳实践标准:模拟》(SimulationSM)框架,包括目标、主持人的教育和技能、汇报和参与者评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is simulation-based team training performed by personnel in accordance with the INACSL Standards of Best Practice: SimulationSM?-a qualitative interview study.

Background: Anesthesia personnel was among the first to implement simulation and team training including non-technical skills (NTS) in the field of healthcare. Within anesthesia practice, NTS are critically important in preventing harmful undesirable events. To our best knowledge, there has been little documentation of the extent to which anesthesia personnel uses recommended frameworks like the Standards of Best Practice: SimulationSM to guide simulation and thereby optimize learning. The aim of our study was to explore how anesthesia personnel in Norway conduct simulation-based team training (SBTT) with respect to outcomes and objectives, facilitation, debriefing, and participant evaluation.

Methods: Individual qualitative interviews with healthcare professionals, with experience and responsible for SBTT in anesthesia, from 51 Norwegian public hospitals were conducted from August 2016 to October 2017. A qualitative deductive content analysis was performed.

Results: The use of objectives and educated facilitators was common. All participants participated in debriefings, and almost all conducted evaluations, mainly formative. Preparedness, structure, and time available were pointed out as issues affecting SBTT.

Conclusions: Anesthesia personnel's SBTT in this study met the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning (INACSL) Standard of Best Practice: SimulationSM framework to a certain extent with regard to objectives, facilitators' education and skills, debriefing, and participant evaluation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Massive open online course: a new strategy for faculty development needs in healthcare simulation. Changing the conversation: impact of guidelines designed to optimize interprofessional facilitation of simulation-based team training. Speech recognition technology for assessing team debriefing communication and interaction patterns: An algorithmic toolkit for healthcare simulation educators. Effectiveness of hybrid simulation training on medical student performance in whole-task consultation of cardiac patients: The ASSIMILATE EXCELLENCE randomized waitlist-controlled trial. Using simulation scenarios and a debriefing structure to promote feedback skills among interprofessional team members in clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1