{"title":"“寓教于乐”的“城市”:18世纪德国美学想象中的原型。","authors":"Julian Johannes Koch","doi":"10.1353/jhi.2021.0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article outlines what is arguably the uniquely German trajectory of the imagination, focusing on the relation between the imagination and \"Urbild\" in eighteenth-century German aesthetics, particularly in Kant and Schelling. I contend that shared German roots of the \"Einbildung\" (imagination) and \"Urbild\" (archetype) in \"Bild\" led German aesthetic thinkers to conceive of the imagination much more in (Neo-)Platonic terms. This article therefore argues that there is a perceptible rift in how the imagination is conceived in eighteenth-century discourse which follows a linguistic fault line between the Latin-origin \"imagination\" and the German \"Einbildung.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":47274,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF IDEAS","volume":"82 4","pages":"569-591"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The \\\"Urbild\\\" of \\\"Einbildung\\\": The Archetype in the Imagination in Eighteenth-Century German Aesthetics.\",\"authors\":\"Julian Johannes Koch\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jhi.2021.0033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article outlines what is arguably the uniquely German trajectory of the imagination, focusing on the relation between the imagination and \\\"Urbild\\\" in eighteenth-century German aesthetics, particularly in Kant and Schelling. I contend that shared German roots of the \\\"Einbildung\\\" (imagination) and \\\"Urbild\\\" (archetype) in \\\"Bild\\\" led German aesthetic thinkers to conceive of the imagination much more in (Neo-)Platonic terms. This article therefore argues that there is a perceptible rift in how the imagination is conceived in eighteenth-century discourse which follows a linguistic fault line between the Latin-origin \\\"imagination\\\" and the German \\\"Einbildung.\\\"</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF IDEAS\",\"volume\":\"82 4\",\"pages\":\"569-591\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF IDEAS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2021.0033\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF IDEAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2021.0033","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The "Urbild" of "Einbildung": The Archetype in the Imagination in Eighteenth-Century German Aesthetics.
This article outlines what is arguably the uniquely German trajectory of the imagination, focusing on the relation between the imagination and "Urbild" in eighteenth-century German aesthetics, particularly in Kant and Schelling. I contend that shared German roots of the "Einbildung" (imagination) and "Urbild" (archetype) in "Bild" led German aesthetic thinkers to conceive of the imagination much more in (Neo-)Platonic terms. This article therefore argues that there is a perceptible rift in how the imagination is conceived in eighteenth-century discourse which follows a linguistic fault line between the Latin-origin "imagination" and the German "Einbildung."
期刊介绍:
Since its inception in 1940, the Journal of the History of Ideas has served as a medium for the publication of research in intellectual history that is of common interest to scholars and students in a wide range of fields. It is committed to encouraging diversity in regional coverage, chronological range, and methodological approaches. JHI defines intellectual history expansively and ecumenically, including the histories of philosophy, of literature and the arts, of the natural and social sciences, of religion, and of political thought. It also encourages scholarship at the intersections of cultural and intellectual history — for example, the history of the book and of visual culture.