当勺子不再是勺子:执行功能在幼儿发散性思维中的作用

IF 3.4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Trends in Neuroscience and Education Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tine.2021.100161
Julie Vaisarova , Stephanie M. Carlson
{"title":"当勺子不再是勺子:执行功能在幼儿发散性思维中的作用","authors":"Julie Vaisarova ,&nbsp;Stephanie M. Carlson","doi":"10.1016/j.tine.2021.100161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Research with adults suggests that executive function (EF) might play a role in the development of divergent thinking, a key component of creativity, by helping children override canonical knowledge.</p></div><div><h3>Procedure</h3><p>We examined this possibility in two experiments, by manipulating the familiarity of objects used in the Alternate Uses test of divergent thinking both between-participants (Experiment 1: <em>N</em> = 53 4-year-olds and 50 6-year-olds) and within-participants (Experiment 2: <em>N</em> = 74 5-year-olds).</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>We found evidence that younger children generated more and/or more original ideas for novel than familiar objects. However, this effect disappeared with age and did not depend on child EF. Further, EF was inversely associated with divergent thinking, controlling for age, intelligence, and income.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>These results call into question a simple executive account of children's divergent thinking and suggest that, among predominantly White, socioeconomically advantaged 4–6-year-olds, divergent idea-generation might be a primarily bottom-up process that can be hindered by top-down thinking.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46228,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When a spoon is not a spoon: Examining the role of executive function in young children's divergent thinking\",\"authors\":\"Julie Vaisarova ,&nbsp;Stephanie M. Carlson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tine.2021.100161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Research with adults suggests that executive function (EF) might play a role in the development of divergent thinking, a key component of creativity, by helping children override canonical knowledge.</p></div><div><h3>Procedure</h3><p>We examined this possibility in two experiments, by manipulating the familiarity of objects used in the Alternate Uses test of divergent thinking both between-participants (Experiment 1: <em>N</em> = 53 4-year-olds and 50 6-year-olds) and within-participants (Experiment 2: <em>N</em> = 74 5-year-olds).</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>We found evidence that younger children generated more and/or more original ideas for novel than familiar objects. However, this effect disappeared with age and did not depend on child EF. Further, EF was inversely associated with divergent thinking, controlling for age, intelligence, and income.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>These results call into question a simple executive account of children's divergent thinking and suggest that, among predominantly White, socioeconomically advantaged 4–6-year-olds, divergent idea-generation might be a primarily bottom-up process that can be hindered by top-down thinking.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Neuroscience and Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Neuroscience and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211949321000132\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211949321000132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

对成人的研究表明,执行功能(EF)可能通过帮助儿童超越规范知识,在发散思维的发展中发挥作用,发散思维是创造力的关键组成部分。我们在两个实验中检验了这种可能性,通过操纵在发散思维替代用途测试中使用的物体的熟悉度,在参与者之间(实验1:53名4岁儿童和50名6岁儿童)和参与者内部(实验2:74名5岁儿童)。我们发现有证据表明,年龄较小的孩子对新奇事物产生的原创想法比熟悉的事物多。然而,这种影响随着年龄的增长而消失,与儿童EF无关。此外,EF与发散性思维呈负相关,受年龄、智力和收入的影响。这些结果对儿童发散性思维的简单行政解释提出了质疑,并表明,在以白人为主、社会经济条件优越的4 - 6岁儿童中,发散性想法的产生可能主要是一个自下而上的过程,可能会受到自上而下思维的阻碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
When a spoon is not a spoon: Examining the role of executive function in young children's divergent thinking

Background

Research with adults suggests that executive function (EF) might play a role in the development of divergent thinking, a key component of creativity, by helping children override canonical knowledge.

Procedure

We examined this possibility in two experiments, by manipulating the familiarity of objects used in the Alternate Uses test of divergent thinking both between-participants (Experiment 1: N = 53 4-year-olds and 50 6-year-olds) and within-participants (Experiment 2: N = 74 5-year-olds).

Findings

We found evidence that younger children generated more and/or more original ideas for novel than familiar objects. However, this effect disappeared with age and did not depend on child EF. Further, EF was inversely associated with divergent thinking, controlling for age, intelligence, and income.

Significance

These results call into question a simple executive account of children's divergent thinking and suggest that, among predominantly White, socioeconomically advantaged 4–6-year-olds, divergent idea-generation might be a primarily bottom-up process that can be hindered by top-down thinking.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
22
审稿时长
65 days
期刊最新文献
Dimensional versus categorical approach: A comparative study of mathematical cognition Translating neuroscience research to practice through grassroots professional learning communities Combining cognitive and affective factors related to mathematical achievement in 4th graders: A psychological network analysis study Neurobiological stress markers in educational research: A systematic review of physiological insights in health science education Applying the science of learning to teacher professional development and back again: Lessons from 3 country contexts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1