[测量的不确定性和复杂计算的结果:母体血清标记物对胎儿唐氏综合征风险的影响]。

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Annales de biologie clinique Pub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI:10.1684/abc.2021.1695
Estelle Roland, Etienne Voirin-Mathieu, Sophie Dreux, Gilles Renom
{"title":"[测量的不确定性和复杂计算的结果:母体血清标记物对胎儿唐氏综合征风险的影响]。","authors":"Estelle Roland,&nbsp;Etienne Voirin-Mathieu,&nbsp;Sophie Dreux,&nbsp;Gilles Renom","doi":"10.1684/abc.2021.1695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Screening for fetal Down's syndrome has the peculiarity of combining the biochemical assay of 2 or 3 serum markers with the risk associated with maternal age. If the accuracy of measurement of each parameter is known by the biologist, the uncertainty of the ultimate risk to the patient is not. Indeed, the means of risk calculation involve numerous multi-parameter equations which are not practical for daily use. Defining a re-test limit on thresholds of 1/50 and 1/1,000 is therefore impossible. Since the use of an arbitrarily defined threshold is not being satisfactory, we propose, by default, a methodology based on the exploitation of patient files in the laboratory with risks close to the two decision thresholds. Modulations of the concentrations of all the markers according to their uncertainty allow new risks to be obtained, which can be averaged and framed by an interval of several standard deviations. Choosing the level of uncertainty, the number of files to include, the number of standard deviations framing the average risk, as well as the calculation software, are all choices available to the biologist. The proposed methodology is therefore highly empirical but open, and adaptable, to the specific environment and performance capabilities of each and every laboratory involved.</p>","PeriodicalId":7892,"journal":{"name":"Annales de biologie clinique","volume":"80 1","pages":"85-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Uncertainty of measurement and result from a complex calculation: about the risk of fetal Down's syndrome by maternal serum markers].\",\"authors\":\"Estelle Roland,&nbsp;Etienne Voirin-Mathieu,&nbsp;Sophie Dreux,&nbsp;Gilles Renom\",\"doi\":\"10.1684/abc.2021.1695\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Screening for fetal Down's syndrome has the peculiarity of combining the biochemical assay of 2 or 3 serum markers with the risk associated with maternal age. If the accuracy of measurement of each parameter is known by the biologist, the uncertainty of the ultimate risk to the patient is not. Indeed, the means of risk calculation involve numerous multi-parameter equations which are not practical for daily use. Defining a re-test limit on thresholds of 1/50 and 1/1,000 is therefore impossible. Since the use of an arbitrarily defined threshold is not being satisfactory, we propose, by default, a methodology based on the exploitation of patient files in the laboratory with risks close to the two decision thresholds. Modulations of the concentrations of all the markers according to their uncertainty allow new risks to be obtained, which can be averaged and framed by an interval of several standard deviations. Choosing the level of uncertainty, the number of files to include, the number of standard deviations framing the average risk, as well as the calculation software, are all choices available to the biologist. The proposed methodology is therefore highly empirical but open, and adaptable, to the specific environment and performance capabilities of each and every laboratory involved.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annales de biologie clinique\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"85-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annales de biologie clinique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1684/abc.2021.1695\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales de biologie clinique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1684/abc.2021.1695","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胎儿唐氏综合征筛查的特点是将2或3种血清标志物的生化检测与母亲年龄相关的风险相结合。如果生物学家知道每个参数测量的准确性,那么对患者的最终风险的不确定性就不是。事实上,风险计算的方法涉及许多多参数方程,这些方程不适合日常使用。因此,在1/50和1/ 1000的阈值上定义重新测试限制是不可能的。由于使用任意定义的阈值是不令人满意的,我们建议,默认情况下,一种基于利用实验室患者档案的方法,其风险接近两个决策阈值。根据不确定度对所有标记物的浓度进行调节,可以获得新的风险,这些风险可以用几个标准差的间隔来平均和框架。选择不确定性的程度、要包含的文件数量、构成平均风险的标准偏差的数量,以及计算软件,这些都是生物学家可以选择的。因此,所提出的方法是高度经验性的,但开放和适应性强,适用于每个实验室的特定环境和性能能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Uncertainty of measurement and result from a complex calculation: about the risk of fetal Down's syndrome by maternal serum markers].

Screening for fetal Down's syndrome has the peculiarity of combining the biochemical assay of 2 or 3 serum markers with the risk associated with maternal age. If the accuracy of measurement of each parameter is known by the biologist, the uncertainty of the ultimate risk to the patient is not. Indeed, the means of risk calculation involve numerous multi-parameter equations which are not practical for daily use. Defining a re-test limit on thresholds of 1/50 and 1/1,000 is therefore impossible. Since the use of an arbitrarily defined threshold is not being satisfactory, we propose, by default, a methodology based on the exploitation of patient files in the laboratory with risks close to the two decision thresholds. Modulations of the concentrations of all the markers according to their uncertainty allow new risks to be obtained, which can be averaged and framed by an interval of several standard deviations. Choosing the level of uncertainty, the number of files to include, the number of standard deviations framing the average risk, as well as the calculation software, are all choices available to the biologist. The proposed methodology is therefore highly empirical but open, and adaptable, to the specific environment and performance capabilities of each and every laboratory involved.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annales de biologie clinique
Annales de biologie clinique 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Multidisciplinary information with direct relevance to everyday practice Annales de Biologie Clinique, the official journal of the French Society of Clinical Biology (SFBC), supports biologists in areas including continuing education, laboratory accreditation and technique validation. With original articles, abstracts and accounts of everyday practice, the journal provides details of advances in knowledge, techniques and equipment, as well as a forum for discussion open to the entire community.
期刊最新文献
[Atlas of flow cytometry images: lymphoproliferative syndromes - Additional images obtained with DxFlex]. [Use of heparin calibrated anti-Xa assay for apixaban and rivaroxaban measurement in the context of regional telestroke activity]. Importance of the reticulocyte hemoglobin equivalent in the exclusion of latent iron deficiency. [Evaluation of a diagnostic test for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: validation of a delayed test time]. Association between the Estrogen receptor β rs1256049 polymorphism and prostate cancer risk:a meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1