Estelle Roland, Etienne Voirin-Mathieu, Sophie Dreux, Gilles Renom
{"title":"[测量的不确定性和复杂计算的结果:母体血清标记物对胎儿唐氏综合征风险的影响]。","authors":"Estelle Roland, Etienne Voirin-Mathieu, Sophie Dreux, Gilles Renom","doi":"10.1684/abc.2021.1695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Screening for fetal Down's syndrome has the peculiarity of combining the biochemical assay of 2 or 3 serum markers with the risk associated with maternal age. If the accuracy of measurement of each parameter is known by the biologist, the uncertainty of the ultimate risk to the patient is not. Indeed, the means of risk calculation involve numerous multi-parameter equations which are not practical for daily use. Defining a re-test limit on thresholds of 1/50 and 1/1,000 is therefore impossible. Since the use of an arbitrarily defined threshold is not being satisfactory, we propose, by default, a methodology based on the exploitation of patient files in the laboratory with risks close to the two decision thresholds. Modulations of the concentrations of all the markers according to their uncertainty allow new risks to be obtained, which can be averaged and framed by an interval of several standard deviations. Choosing the level of uncertainty, the number of files to include, the number of standard deviations framing the average risk, as well as the calculation software, are all choices available to the biologist. The proposed methodology is therefore highly empirical but open, and adaptable, to the specific environment and performance capabilities of each and every laboratory involved.</p>","PeriodicalId":7892,"journal":{"name":"Annales de biologie clinique","volume":"80 1","pages":"85-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Uncertainty of measurement and result from a complex calculation: about the risk of fetal Down's syndrome by maternal serum markers].\",\"authors\":\"Estelle Roland, Etienne Voirin-Mathieu, Sophie Dreux, Gilles Renom\",\"doi\":\"10.1684/abc.2021.1695\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Screening for fetal Down's syndrome has the peculiarity of combining the biochemical assay of 2 or 3 serum markers with the risk associated with maternal age. If the accuracy of measurement of each parameter is known by the biologist, the uncertainty of the ultimate risk to the patient is not. Indeed, the means of risk calculation involve numerous multi-parameter equations which are not practical for daily use. Defining a re-test limit on thresholds of 1/50 and 1/1,000 is therefore impossible. Since the use of an arbitrarily defined threshold is not being satisfactory, we propose, by default, a methodology based on the exploitation of patient files in the laboratory with risks close to the two decision thresholds. Modulations of the concentrations of all the markers according to their uncertainty allow new risks to be obtained, which can be averaged and framed by an interval of several standard deviations. Choosing the level of uncertainty, the number of files to include, the number of standard deviations framing the average risk, as well as the calculation software, are all choices available to the biologist. The proposed methodology is therefore highly empirical but open, and adaptable, to the specific environment and performance capabilities of each and every laboratory involved.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annales de biologie clinique\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"85-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annales de biologie clinique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1684/abc.2021.1695\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales de biologie clinique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1684/abc.2021.1695","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Uncertainty of measurement and result from a complex calculation: about the risk of fetal Down's syndrome by maternal serum markers].
Screening for fetal Down's syndrome has the peculiarity of combining the biochemical assay of 2 or 3 serum markers with the risk associated with maternal age. If the accuracy of measurement of each parameter is known by the biologist, the uncertainty of the ultimate risk to the patient is not. Indeed, the means of risk calculation involve numerous multi-parameter equations which are not practical for daily use. Defining a re-test limit on thresholds of 1/50 and 1/1,000 is therefore impossible. Since the use of an arbitrarily defined threshold is not being satisfactory, we propose, by default, a methodology based on the exploitation of patient files in the laboratory with risks close to the two decision thresholds. Modulations of the concentrations of all the markers according to their uncertainty allow new risks to be obtained, which can be averaged and framed by an interval of several standard deviations. Choosing the level of uncertainty, the number of files to include, the number of standard deviations framing the average risk, as well as the calculation software, are all choices available to the biologist. The proposed methodology is therefore highly empirical but open, and adaptable, to the specific environment and performance capabilities of each and every laboratory involved.
期刊介绍:
Multidisciplinary information with direct relevance to everyday practice
Annales de Biologie Clinique, the official journal of the French Society of Clinical Biology (SFBC), supports biologists in areas including continuing education, laboratory accreditation and technique validation.
With original articles, abstracts and accounts of everyday practice, the journal provides details of advances in knowledge, techniques and equipment, as well as a forum for discussion open to the entire community.