病猫外周血白细胞比率的诊断和预后价值。

IF 0.7 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES Acta veterinaria Hungarica Pub Date : 2021-11-08 DOI:10.1556/004.2021.00042
Theodora K Tsouloufi, Petros S Frezoulis, Nectarios Soubasis, Maria Kritsepi-Konstantinou, Ioannis L Oikonomidis
{"title":"病猫外周血白细胞比率的诊断和预后价值。","authors":"Theodora K Tsouloufi, Petros S Frezoulis, Nectarios Soubasis, Maria Kritsepi-Konstantinou, Ioannis L Oikonomidis","doi":"10.1556/004.2021.00042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic and prognostic utility of feline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR) and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratios (LMR) in a variety of underlying diseases. Five-year medical records from cats presenting to the internal medicine unit of a veterinary teaching hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Cats were considered for inclusion based on complete medical records. ADVIA 120 was used for the complete blood counts; the NLR and LMR were calculated by dividing the absolute numbers of the respective leucocytes. Two hundred and nineteen sick and 20 healthy cats were included in the study. The median NLR and LMR were significantly (P < 0.05) elevated and decreased, respectively, in cats with infectious, neoplastic and chronic kidney diseases compared to controls. Additionally, cats with neoplasia had significantly higher median NLR compared to cats with urinary tract and gastrointestinal diseases. Non-survivors had significantly higher NLR and lower LMR compared to survivors. Both ratios had suboptimal prognostic performance for the outcome of sick cats (NLR sensitivity: 37.9%, specificity: 86.4%; LMR sensitivity: 69.0%, specificity: 61.0%). Many different disease categories were associated with increased NLR and decreased LMR compared to controls, but the overall prognostic performance of the two leucocyte ratios was suboptimal.</p>","PeriodicalId":7247,"journal":{"name":"Acta veterinaria Hungarica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic and prognostic value of peripheral blood leucocyte ratios in sick cats.\",\"authors\":\"Theodora K Tsouloufi, Petros S Frezoulis, Nectarios Soubasis, Maria Kritsepi-Konstantinou, Ioannis L Oikonomidis\",\"doi\":\"10.1556/004.2021.00042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic and prognostic utility of feline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR) and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratios (LMR) in a variety of underlying diseases. Five-year medical records from cats presenting to the internal medicine unit of a veterinary teaching hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Cats were considered for inclusion based on complete medical records. ADVIA 120 was used for the complete blood counts; the NLR and LMR were calculated by dividing the absolute numbers of the respective leucocytes. Two hundred and nineteen sick and 20 healthy cats were included in the study. The median NLR and LMR were significantly (P < 0.05) elevated and decreased, respectively, in cats with infectious, neoplastic and chronic kidney diseases compared to controls. Additionally, cats with neoplasia had significantly higher median NLR compared to cats with urinary tract and gastrointestinal diseases. Non-survivors had significantly higher NLR and lower LMR compared to survivors. Both ratios had suboptimal prognostic performance for the outcome of sick cats (NLR sensitivity: 37.9%, specificity: 86.4%; LMR sensitivity: 69.0%, specificity: 61.0%). Many different disease categories were associated with increased NLR and decreased LMR compared to controls, but the overall prognostic performance of the two leucocyte ratios was suboptimal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta veterinaria Hungarica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta veterinaria Hungarica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1556/004.2021.00042\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta veterinaria Hungarica","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/004.2021.00042","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估猫中性粒细胞对淋巴细胞比率(NLR)和淋巴细胞对单核细胞比率(LMR)在各种潜在疾病中的诊断和预后作用。我们对一家兽医教学医院内科部门的猫五年病历进行了回顾性审查。根据完整的医疗记录考虑纳入猫咪。使用 ADVIA 120 进行全血细胞计数;NLR 和 LMR 通过除以各自白细胞的绝对数量计算得出。研究共纳入了 219 只病猫和 20 只健康猫。与对照组相比,感染性、肿瘤性和慢性肾脏疾病猫的 NLR 和 LMR 中位数分别显著升高(P < 0.05)和降低。此外,与患有泌尿道和胃肠道疾病的猫相比,患有肿瘤的猫的中位 NLR 明显更高。与存活者相比,非存活者的 NLR 明显更高,而 LMR 则更低。这两个比率对病猫的预后效果都不理想(NLR 灵敏度:37.9%,特异性:86.4%;LMR 灵敏度:69.0%,特异性:61.0%)。与对照组相比,许多不同的疾病类别都与 NLR 升高和 LMR 降低有关,但这两种白细胞比率的总体预后效果并不理想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnostic and prognostic value of peripheral blood leucocyte ratios in sick cats.

The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic and prognostic utility of feline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR) and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratios (LMR) in a variety of underlying diseases. Five-year medical records from cats presenting to the internal medicine unit of a veterinary teaching hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Cats were considered for inclusion based on complete medical records. ADVIA 120 was used for the complete blood counts; the NLR and LMR were calculated by dividing the absolute numbers of the respective leucocytes. Two hundred and nineteen sick and 20 healthy cats were included in the study. The median NLR and LMR were significantly (P < 0.05) elevated and decreased, respectively, in cats with infectious, neoplastic and chronic kidney diseases compared to controls. Additionally, cats with neoplasia had significantly higher median NLR compared to cats with urinary tract and gastrointestinal diseases. Non-survivors had significantly higher NLR and lower LMR compared to survivors. Both ratios had suboptimal prognostic performance for the outcome of sick cats (NLR sensitivity: 37.9%, specificity: 86.4%; LMR sensitivity: 69.0%, specificity: 61.0%). Many different disease categories were associated with increased NLR and decreased LMR compared to controls, but the overall prognostic performance of the two leucocyte ratios was suboptimal.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta veterinaria Hungarica
Acta veterinaria Hungarica 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Veterinaria Hungarica publishes original research papers presenting new scientific results of international interest, and to a limited extent also review articles and clinical case reports, on veterinary physiology (physiological chemistry and metabolism), veterinary microbiology (bacteriology, virology, immunology, molecular biology), on the infectious diseases of domestic animals, on veterinary parasitology, pathology, clinical veterinary science and reproduction.
期刊最新文献
Determination of colostrum quality using Brix refractometer in sheep. Assessment of retinal atrophy in mixed breed dogs using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and electroretinography. First molecular detection of Brachyspira hampsonii on pig farms in Poland. Enhancing cryopreserved ram sperm quality at -80 °C with Spirulina platensis and Salvia verbenaca extracts. Operator impact assessment on qualitative and quantitative parameters of canine platelet-rich plasma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1