Hyeon-Jong Lee, Dong-Soon Choi, Insan Jang, Bong-Kuen Cha
{"title":"骨源性和牙源性支抗面罩治疗效果的比较。","authors":"Hyeon-Jong Lee, Dong-Soon Choi, Insan Jang, Bong-Kuen Cha","doi":"10.2319/032121-219.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate long-term outcomes of dentoskeletal changes induced by facemask therapy using skeletal anchorage in Class III patients and compare them to those of conventional tooth-borne anchorage.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 20 patients who received facemask (FM) therapy with miniplates as anchorage for maxillary protraction (Miniplate/FM group, 10.6 ± 1.1 years old [mean ± SD]) and 23 patients who were treated with facemask with rapid maxillary expander (RME/FM group, 10.0 ± 1.5 years old [mean ± SD]). Dentoskeletal changes were evaluated using lateral cephalograms at pretreatment (T1), after facemask therapy (T2), and at the post-pubertal stage (T3). Cephalometric changes were compared between groups and clinical success rates at T3 were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SNA and A to N perpendicular to FH increased significantly more in the Miniplate/FM group than in the RME/FM group when comparing short-term effects of facemask therapy (T1-T2). ANB, Wits appraisal, Angle of convexity, mandibular plane angle, and overjet decreased significantly more in the RME/FM group than in the Miniplate/FM group after facemask therapy (T2-T3). A more favorable intermaxillary relationship was observed in the Miniplate/FM group than in the RME/FM group in long-term observations (T1-T3). Clinical success rate at T3 was 95% in the Miniplate/FM group and 85% in the RME/FM group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Facemask therapy with skeletal anchorage showed a greater advancement of the maxilla and more favorable stability for correction of Class III malocclusion in the long-term than conventional facemask therapy with tooth-borne anchorage.</p>","PeriodicalId":50790,"journal":{"name":"Angle Orthodontist","volume":"92 3","pages":"307-314"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9020399/pdf/i1945-7103-92-3-307.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of facemask therapy effects using skeletal and tooth-borne anchorage.\",\"authors\":\"Hyeon-Jong Lee, Dong-Soon Choi, Insan Jang, Bong-Kuen Cha\",\"doi\":\"10.2319/032121-219.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate long-term outcomes of dentoskeletal changes induced by facemask therapy using skeletal anchorage in Class III patients and compare them to those of conventional tooth-borne anchorage.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 20 patients who received facemask (FM) therapy with miniplates as anchorage for maxillary protraction (Miniplate/FM group, 10.6 ± 1.1 years old [mean ± SD]) and 23 patients who were treated with facemask with rapid maxillary expander (RME/FM group, 10.0 ± 1.5 years old [mean ± SD]). Dentoskeletal changes were evaluated using lateral cephalograms at pretreatment (T1), after facemask therapy (T2), and at the post-pubertal stage (T3). Cephalometric changes were compared between groups and clinical success rates at T3 were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SNA and A to N perpendicular to FH increased significantly more in the Miniplate/FM group than in the RME/FM group when comparing short-term effects of facemask therapy (T1-T2). ANB, Wits appraisal, Angle of convexity, mandibular plane angle, and overjet decreased significantly more in the RME/FM group than in the Miniplate/FM group after facemask therapy (T2-T3). A more favorable intermaxillary relationship was observed in the Miniplate/FM group than in the RME/FM group in long-term observations (T1-T3). Clinical success rate at T3 was 95% in the Miniplate/FM group and 85% in the RME/FM group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Facemask therapy with skeletal anchorage showed a greater advancement of the maxilla and more favorable stability for correction of Class III malocclusion in the long-term than conventional facemask therapy with tooth-borne anchorage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Angle Orthodontist\",\"volume\":\"92 3\",\"pages\":\"307-314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9020399/pdf/i1945-7103-92-3-307.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Angle Orthodontist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2319/032121-219.1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Angle Orthodontist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2319/032121-219.1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
目的:研究III类患者使用骨支抗面罩治疗引起的牙骨骼改变的长期结果,并与常规牙基支抗进行比较。材料与方法:回顾性研究20例接受面罩(FM)治疗的患者(Miniplate/FM组,10.6±1.1岁[mean±SD])和23例接受面罩+快速上颌扩张器治疗的患者(RME/FM组,10.0±1.5岁[mean±SD])。在治疗前(T1)、面罩治疗后(T2)和青春期后(T3),通过侧位头颅造影评估牙骨骼的变化。比较两组之间的头颅测量变化,并评估T3的临床成功率。结果:在短期效果(T1-T2)比较中,Miniplate/FM组SNA和垂直于FH的A to N明显高于RME/FM组。面罩治疗后(T2-T3), RME/FM组ANB、Wits评估、下颌凸角、下颌平面角、overjet的下降明显高于Miniplate/FM组。在长期观察(T1-T3)中,Miniplate/FM组比RME/FM组有更好的上颌间关系。Miniplate/FM组T3的临床成功率为95%,RME/FM组为85%。结论:骨支抗面罩治疗比传统牙体支抗面罩治疗具有更大的上颌前移性和更佳的长期稳定性。
Comparison of facemask therapy effects using skeletal and tooth-borne anchorage.
Objectives: To investigate long-term outcomes of dentoskeletal changes induced by facemask therapy using skeletal anchorage in Class III patients and compare them to those of conventional tooth-borne anchorage.
Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 20 patients who received facemask (FM) therapy with miniplates as anchorage for maxillary protraction (Miniplate/FM group, 10.6 ± 1.1 years old [mean ± SD]) and 23 patients who were treated with facemask with rapid maxillary expander (RME/FM group, 10.0 ± 1.5 years old [mean ± SD]). Dentoskeletal changes were evaluated using lateral cephalograms at pretreatment (T1), after facemask therapy (T2), and at the post-pubertal stage (T3). Cephalometric changes were compared between groups and clinical success rates at T3 were evaluated.
Results: SNA and A to N perpendicular to FH increased significantly more in the Miniplate/FM group than in the RME/FM group when comparing short-term effects of facemask therapy (T1-T2). ANB, Wits appraisal, Angle of convexity, mandibular plane angle, and overjet decreased significantly more in the RME/FM group than in the Miniplate/FM group after facemask therapy (T2-T3). A more favorable intermaxillary relationship was observed in the Miniplate/FM group than in the RME/FM group in long-term observations (T1-T3). Clinical success rate at T3 was 95% in the Miniplate/FM group and 85% in the RME/FM group.
Conclusions: Facemask therapy with skeletal anchorage showed a greater advancement of the maxilla and more favorable stability for correction of Class III malocclusion in the long-term than conventional facemask therapy with tooth-borne anchorage.
期刊介绍:
The Angle Orthodontist is the official publication of the Edward H. Angle Society of Orthodontists and is published bimonthly in January, March, May, July, September and November by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation Inc.
The Angle Orthodontist is the only major journal in orthodontics with a non-commercial, non-profit publisher -- The E. H. Angle Education and Research Foundation. We value our freedom to operate exclusively in the best interests of our readers and authors. Our website www.angle.org is completely free and open to all visitors.