骨源性和牙源性支抗面罩治疗效果的比较。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Angle Orthodontist Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.2319/032121-219.1
Hyeon-Jong Lee, Dong-Soon Choi, Insan Jang, Bong-Kuen Cha
{"title":"骨源性和牙源性支抗面罩治疗效果的比较。","authors":"Hyeon-Jong Lee,&nbsp;Dong-Soon Choi,&nbsp;Insan Jang,&nbsp;Bong-Kuen Cha","doi":"10.2319/032121-219.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate long-term outcomes of dentoskeletal changes induced by facemask therapy using skeletal anchorage in Class III patients and compare them to those of conventional tooth-borne anchorage.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 20 patients who received facemask (FM) therapy with miniplates as anchorage for maxillary protraction (Miniplate/FM group, 10.6 ± 1.1 years old [mean ± SD]) and 23 patients who were treated with facemask with rapid maxillary expander (RME/FM group, 10.0 ± 1.5 years old [mean ± SD]). Dentoskeletal changes were evaluated using lateral cephalograms at pretreatment (T1), after facemask therapy (T2), and at the post-pubertal stage (T3). Cephalometric changes were compared between groups and clinical success rates at T3 were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SNA and A to N perpendicular to FH increased significantly more in the Miniplate/FM group than in the RME/FM group when comparing short-term effects of facemask therapy (T1-T2). ANB, Wits appraisal, Angle of convexity, mandibular plane angle, and overjet decreased significantly more in the RME/FM group than in the Miniplate/FM group after facemask therapy (T2-T3). A more favorable intermaxillary relationship was observed in the Miniplate/FM group than in the RME/FM group in long-term observations (T1-T3). Clinical success rate at T3 was 95% in the Miniplate/FM group and 85% in the RME/FM group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Facemask therapy with skeletal anchorage showed a greater advancement of the maxilla and more favorable stability for correction of Class III malocclusion in the long-term than conventional facemask therapy with tooth-borne anchorage.</p>","PeriodicalId":50790,"journal":{"name":"Angle Orthodontist","volume":"92 3","pages":"307-314"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9020399/pdf/i1945-7103-92-3-307.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of facemask therapy effects using skeletal and tooth-borne anchorage.\",\"authors\":\"Hyeon-Jong Lee,&nbsp;Dong-Soon Choi,&nbsp;Insan Jang,&nbsp;Bong-Kuen Cha\",\"doi\":\"10.2319/032121-219.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate long-term outcomes of dentoskeletal changes induced by facemask therapy using skeletal anchorage in Class III patients and compare them to those of conventional tooth-borne anchorage.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 20 patients who received facemask (FM) therapy with miniplates as anchorage for maxillary protraction (Miniplate/FM group, 10.6 ± 1.1 years old [mean ± SD]) and 23 patients who were treated with facemask with rapid maxillary expander (RME/FM group, 10.0 ± 1.5 years old [mean ± SD]). Dentoskeletal changes were evaluated using lateral cephalograms at pretreatment (T1), after facemask therapy (T2), and at the post-pubertal stage (T3). Cephalometric changes were compared between groups and clinical success rates at T3 were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SNA and A to N perpendicular to FH increased significantly more in the Miniplate/FM group than in the RME/FM group when comparing short-term effects of facemask therapy (T1-T2). ANB, Wits appraisal, Angle of convexity, mandibular plane angle, and overjet decreased significantly more in the RME/FM group than in the Miniplate/FM group after facemask therapy (T2-T3). A more favorable intermaxillary relationship was observed in the Miniplate/FM group than in the RME/FM group in long-term observations (T1-T3). Clinical success rate at T3 was 95% in the Miniplate/FM group and 85% in the RME/FM group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Facemask therapy with skeletal anchorage showed a greater advancement of the maxilla and more favorable stability for correction of Class III malocclusion in the long-term than conventional facemask therapy with tooth-borne anchorage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Angle Orthodontist\",\"volume\":\"92 3\",\"pages\":\"307-314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9020399/pdf/i1945-7103-92-3-307.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Angle Orthodontist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2319/032121-219.1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Angle Orthodontist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2319/032121-219.1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的:研究III类患者使用骨支抗面罩治疗引起的牙骨骼改变的长期结果,并与常规牙基支抗进行比较。材料与方法:回顾性研究20例接受面罩(FM)治疗的患者(Miniplate/FM组,10.6±1.1岁[mean±SD])和23例接受面罩+快速上颌扩张器治疗的患者(RME/FM组,10.0±1.5岁[mean±SD])。在治疗前(T1)、面罩治疗后(T2)和青春期后(T3),通过侧位头颅造影评估牙骨骼的变化。比较两组之间的头颅测量变化,并评估T3的临床成功率。结果:在短期效果(T1-T2)比较中,Miniplate/FM组SNA和垂直于FH的A to N明显高于RME/FM组。面罩治疗后(T2-T3), RME/FM组ANB、Wits评估、下颌凸角、下颌平面角、overjet的下降明显高于Miniplate/FM组。在长期观察(T1-T3)中,Miniplate/FM组比RME/FM组有更好的上颌间关系。Miniplate/FM组T3的临床成功率为95%,RME/FM组为85%。结论:骨支抗面罩治疗比传统牙体支抗面罩治疗具有更大的上颌前移性和更佳的长期稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of facemask therapy effects using skeletal and tooth-borne anchorage.

Objectives: To investigate long-term outcomes of dentoskeletal changes induced by facemask therapy using skeletal anchorage in Class III patients and compare them to those of conventional tooth-borne anchorage.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 20 patients who received facemask (FM) therapy with miniplates as anchorage for maxillary protraction (Miniplate/FM group, 10.6 ± 1.1 years old [mean ± SD]) and 23 patients who were treated with facemask with rapid maxillary expander (RME/FM group, 10.0 ± 1.5 years old [mean ± SD]). Dentoskeletal changes were evaluated using lateral cephalograms at pretreatment (T1), after facemask therapy (T2), and at the post-pubertal stage (T3). Cephalometric changes were compared between groups and clinical success rates at T3 were evaluated.

Results: SNA and A to N perpendicular to FH increased significantly more in the Miniplate/FM group than in the RME/FM group when comparing short-term effects of facemask therapy (T1-T2). ANB, Wits appraisal, Angle of convexity, mandibular plane angle, and overjet decreased significantly more in the RME/FM group than in the Miniplate/FM group after facemask therapy (T2-T3). A more favorable intermaxillary relationship was observed in the Miniplate/FM group than in the RME/FM group in long-term observations (T1-T3). Clinical success rate at T3 was 95% in the Miniplate/FM group and 85% in the RME/FM group.

Conclusions: Facemask therapy with skeletal anchorage showed a greater advancement of the maxilla and more favorable stability for correction of Class III malocclusion in the long-term than conventional facemask therapy with tooth-borne anchorage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Angle Orthodontist
Angle Orthodontist 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
95
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Angle Orthodontist is the official publication of the Edward H. Angle Society of Orthodontists and is published bimonthly in January, March, May, July, September and November by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation Inc. The Angle Orthodontist is the only major journal in orthodontics with a non-commercial, non-profit publisher -- The E. H. Angle Education and Research Foundation. We value our freedom to operate exclusively in the best interests of our readers and authors. Our website www.angle.org is completely free and open to all visitors.
期刊最新文献
Does clinical experience affect the bracket bonding accuracy of guided bonding devices in vitro? Digitization and validation of the open bite checklist manifesto: a step toward artificial intelligence. The effect of vertical skeletal proportions on overbite changes in untreated adolescents: a longitudinal evaluation. Predicted overbite and overjet changes with the Invisalign appliance: a validation study. Responsiveness of three measurements in cone-beam computed tomography transverse analyses during both tooth-supported and mini-screw-assisted rapid maxillary expansion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1