无缝合线与缝合线技术在原发性翼状胬肉切除术中的应用:一项前瞻性研究。

IF 0.5 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2022-04-30 eCollection Date: 2021-10-01 DOI:10.4103/meajo.meajo_533_20
Shimna C Prasad, Sheldon J Goudinho, Shela M Isaac, Susha G Sumangala
{"title":"无缝合线与缝合线技术在原发性翼状胬肉切除术中的应用:一项前瞻性研究。","authors":"Shimna C Prasad,&nbsp;Sheldon J Goudinho,&nbsp;Shela M Isaac,&nbsp;Susha G Sumangala","doi":"10.4103/meajo.meajo_533_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Conjunctivolimbal autograft is proposed to be the best treatment for pterygium and autograft can be fixed either with sutures or without. This study was undertaken to assess and compare the efficacy of sutureless versus suture techniques for conjunctivolimbal autografting in primary pterygium.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was conducted in the department of ophthalmology in a tertiary care center from March 2018 to September 2019. Twenty consecutive patients in the age group of 20 to 70 years with primary pterygium were included. Ten patients underwent suture technique for autograft placement, whereas ten patients underwent sutureless technique. Comparison of both the groups was done in terms of duration of surgery and postoperative symptoms. Data were entered into Microsoft Excel software and analyzed using SPSS software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the first group, the mean duration of surgery was 48 min and it was 38 min in the second group. The difference was statistically significant (<i>P</i> = 0.000). Postoperatively, foreign-body sensation was present in nine patients in the first group, whereas it was absent among the patients in the second group. The difference was statistically significant (<i>P</i> = 0.000). Four patients in the first group and two patients in the second group had postoperative hyperemia and only one patient in the first group had conjunctival chemosis. A graft-related complication was present in one patient in the second group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sutureless technique is a better technique as compared to conventional suture technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":18740,"journal":{"name":"Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"28 4","pages":"208-210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9198530/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sutureless Versus Suture Technique for Conjunctivolimbal Autografting in Primary Pterygium Excision: A Prospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Shimna C Prasad,&nbsp;Sheldon J Goudinho,&nbsp;Shela M Isaac,&nbsp;Susha G Sumangala\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/meajo.meajo_533_20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Conjunctivolimbal autograft is proposed to be the best treatment for pterygium and autograft can be fixed either with sutures or without. This study was undertaken to assess and compare the efficacy of sutureless versus suture techniques for conjunctivolimbal autografting in primary pterygium.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was conducted in the department of ophthalmology in a tertiary care center from March 2018 to September 2019. Twenty consecutive patients in the age group of 20 to 70 years with primary pterygium were included. Ten patients underwent suture technique for autograft placement, whereas ten patients underwent sutureless technique. Comparison of both the groups was done in terms of duration of surgery and postoperative symptoms. Data were entered into Microsoft Excel software and analyzed using SPSS software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the first group, the mean duration of surgery was 48 min and it was 38 min in the second group. The difference was statistically significant (<i>P</i> = 0.000). Postoperatively, foreign-body sensation was present in nine patients in the first group, whereas it was absent among the patients in the second group. The difference was statistically significant (<i>P</i> = 0.000). Four patients in the first group and two patients in the second group had postoperative hyperemia and only one patient in the first group had conjunctival chemosis. A graft-related complication was present in one patient in the second group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sutureless technique is a better technique as compared to conventional suture technique.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"28 4\",\"pages\":\"208-210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9198530/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/meajo.meajo_533_20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/meajo.meajo_533_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:自体结膜伞骨移植是治疗翼状胬肉的最佳方法,自体结膜伞骨移植可采用缝合或不缝合固定。本研究旨在评估和比较无缝线技术与缝线技术在原发性翼状胬肉自体结膜缘移植术中的疗效。方法:于2018年3月至2019年9月在某三级保健中心眼科进行前瞻性观察研究。20例年龄在20 ~ 70岁的原发性翼状胬肉患者连续入选。10例采用缝线技术,10例采用无缝线技术。两组在手术时间和术后症状方面进行比较。数据录入到Microsoft Excel软件中,使用SPSS软件进行分析。结果:第一组平均手术时间为48 min,第二组平均手术时间为38 min。差异有统计学意义(P = 0.000)。术后,第一组有9例患者有异物感,而第二组无异物感。差异有统计学意义(P = 0.000)。第一组术后充血4例,第二组术后充血2例,第一组仅1例结膜化脓。第二组中有1例患者出现移植物相关并发症。结论:与常规缝合技术相比,无缝线技术是一种更好的缝合技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sutureless Versus Suture Technique for Conjunctivolimbal Autografting in Primary Pterygium Excision: A Prospective Study.

Purpose: Conjunctivolimbal autograft is proposed to be the best treatment for pterygium and autograft can be fixed either with sutures or without. This study was undertaken to assess and compare the efficacy of sutureless versus suture techniques for conjunctivolimbal autografting in primary pterygium.

Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in the department of ophthalmology in a tertiary care center from March 2018 to September 2019. Twenty consecutive patients in the age group of 20 to 70 years with primary pterygium were included. Ten patients underwent suture technique for autograft placement, whereas ten patients underwent sutureless technique. Comparison of both the groups was done in terms of duration of surgery and postoperative symptoms. Data were entered into Microsoft Excel software and analyzed using SPSS software.

Results: In the first group, the mean duration of surgery was 48 min and it was 38 min in the second group. The difference was statistically significant (P = 0.000). Postoperatively, foreign-body sensation was present in nine patients in the first group, whereas it was absent among the patients in the second group. The difference was statistically significant (P = 0.000). Four patients in the first group and two patients in the second group had postoperative hyperemia and only one patient in the first group had conjunctival chemosis. A graft-related complication was present in one patient in the second group.

Conclusion: Sutureless technique is a better technique as compared to conventional suture technique.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: The Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology (MEAJO), published four times per year in print and online, is an official journal of the Middle East African Council of Ophthalmology (MEACO). It is an international, peer-reviewed journal whose mission includes publication of original research of interest to ophthalmologists in the Middle East and Africa, and to provide readers with high quality educational review articles from world-renown experts. MEAJO, previously known as Middle East Journal of Ophthalmology (MEJO) was founded by Dr Akef El Maghraby in 1993.
期刊最新文献
Pro re nata Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema with Cycles of Three Injections of Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injections. A Clinical Study on Severity of Dry Eye in Individuals with Pterygium at a Tertiary Hospital in South Kerala. A Novel Snake-chain Metal Probed Silicon Intubation Set for Nasolacrimal Duct Intubation: A Cadaveric Feasibility Study. A Population-based Study of the Prevalence of Cataract and Its Relationship with Smoking in the Northwest of Iran: The Azar Cohort Eye Study. Bilateral Acute Iris Transillumination Following Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1