热解Omni处理器处理粪便污泥的经济可行性和环境可持续性

IF 6.7 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL ACS Environmental Au Pub Date : 2022-07-29 DOI:10.1021/acsenvironau.2c00022
Lewis Stetson Rowles*, Victoria L. Morgan, Yalin Li, Xinyi Zhang, Shion Watabe, Tyler Stephen, Hannah A. C. Lohman, Derek DeSouza, Jeff Hallowell, Roland D. Cusick and Jeremy S. Guest*, 
{"title":"热解Omni处理器处理粪便污泥的经济可行性和环境可持续性","authors":"Lewis Stetson Rowles*,&nbsp;Victoria L. Morgan,&nbsp;Yalin Li,&nbsp;Xinyi Zhang,&nbsp;Shion Watabe,&nbsp;Tyler Stephen,&nbsp;Hannah A. C. Lohman,&nbsp;Derek DeSouza,&nbsp;Jeff Hallowell,&nbsp;Roland D. Cusick and Jeremy S. Guest*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsenvironau.2c00022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Omni Processors (OPs) are community-scale systems for non-sewered fecal sludge treatment. These systems have demonstrated their capacity to treat excreta from tens of thousands of people using thermal treatment processes (e.g., pyrolysis), but their relative sustainability is unclear. In this study, QSDsan (an open-source Python package) was used to characterize the financial viability and environmental implications of fecal sludge treatment via pyrolysis-based OP technology treating mixed and source-separated human excreta and to elucidate the key drivers of system sustainability. Overall, the daily per capita cost for the treatment of mixed excreta (pit latrines) via the OP was estimated to be 0.05 [0.03–0.08] USD·cap<sup>–1</sup>·d<sup>–1</sup>, while the treatment of source-separated excreta (from urine-diverting dry toilets) was estimated to have a per capita cost of 0.09 [0.08–0.14] USD·cap<sup>–1</sup>·d<sup>–1</sup>. Operation and maintenance of the OP is a critical driver of total per capita cost, whereas the contribution from capital cost of the OP is much lower because it is distributed over a relatively large number of users (i.e., 12,000 people) for the system lifetime (i.e., 20 yr). The total emissions from the source-separated scenario were estimated to be 11 [8.3–23] kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq·cap<sup>–1</sup>·yr<sup>–1</sup>, compared to 49 [28–77] kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq·cap<sup>–1</sup>·yr<sup>–1</sup> for mixed excreta. Both scenarios fall below the estimates of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for anaerobic treatment of fecal sludge collected from pit latrines. Source-separation also creates opportunities for resource recovery to offset costs through nutrient recovery and carbon sequestration with biochar production. For example, when carbon is valued at 150 USD·Mg<sup>–1</sup> of CO<sub>2</sub>, the per capita cost of sanitation can be further reduced by 44 and 40% for the source-separated and mixed excreta scenarios, respectively. Overall, our results demonstrate that pyrolysis-based OP technology can provide low-cost, low-GHG fecal sludge treatment while reducing global sanitation gaps.</p>","PeriodicalId":29801,"journal":{"name":"ACS Environmental Au","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502014/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Financial Viability and Environmental Sustainability of Fecal Sludge Treatment with Pyrolysis Omni Processors\",\"authors\":\"Lewis Stetson Rowles*,&nbsp;Victoria L. Morgan,&nbsp;Yalin Li,&nbsp;Xinyi Zhang,&nbsp;Shion Watabe,&nbsp;Tyler Stephen,&nbsp;Hannah A. C. Lohman,&nbsp;Derek DeSouza,&nbsp;Jeff Hallowell,&nbsp;Roland D. Cusick and Jeremy S. Guest*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsenvironau.2c00022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Omni Processors (OPs) are community-scale systems for non-sewered fecal sludge treatment. These systems have demonstrated their capacity to treat excreta from tens of thousands of people using thermal treatment processes (e.g., pyrolysis), but their relative sustainability is unclear. In this study, QSDsan (an open-source Python package) was used to characterize the financial viability and environmental implications of fecal sludge treatment via pyrolysis-based OP technology treating mixed and source-separated human excreta and to elucidate the key drivers of system sustainability. Overall, the daily per capita cost for the treatment of mixed excreta (pit latrines) via the OP was estimated to be 0.05 [0.03–0.08] USD·cap<sup>–1</sup>·d<sup>–1</sup>, while the treatment of source-separated excreta (from urine-diverting dry toilets) was estimated to have a per capita cost of 0.09 [0.08–0.14] USD·cap<sup>–1</sup>·d<sup>–1</sup>. Operation and maintenance of the OP is a critical driver of total per capita cost, whereas the contribution from capital cost of the OP is much lower because it is distributed over a relatively large number of users (i.e., 12,000 people) for the system lifetime (i.e., 20 yr). The total emissions from the source-separated scenario were estimated to be 11 [8.3–23] kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq·cap<sup>–1</sup>·yr<sup>–1</sup>, compared to 49 [28–77] kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq·cap<sup>–1</sup>·yr<sup>–1</sup> for mixed excreta. Both scenarios fall below the estimates of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for anaerobic treatment of fecal sludge collected from pit latrines. Source-separation also creates opportunities for resource recovery to offset costs through nutrient recovery and carbon sequestration with biochar production. For example, when carbon is valued at 150 USD·Mg<sup>–1</sup> of CO<sub>2</sub>, the per capita cost of sanitation can be further reduced by 44 and 40% for the source-separated and mixed excreta scenarios, respectively. Overall, our results demonstrate that pyrolysis-based OP technology can provide low-cost, low-GHG fecal sludge treatment while reducing global sanitation gaps.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Environmental Au\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9502014/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Environmental Au\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsenvironau.2c00022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Environmental Au","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsenvironau.2c00022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

Omni处理器(OPs)是社区规模的系统,用于无下水道的粪便污泥处理。这些系统已经证明了它们使用热处理工艺(例如热解)处理成千上万人的排泄物的能力,但它们的相对可持续性尚不清楚。在这项研究中,使用QSDsan(一个开源Python包)来表征通过基于热解的OP技术处理混合和来源分离的人类排泄物的粪便污泥处理的财务可行性和环境影响,并阐明系统可持续性的关键驱动因素。总体而言,通过OP处理混合排泄物(坑式厕所)的人均每日成本估计为0.05[0.03-0.08]美元·cap-1·d-1,而处理源分离排泄物(来自尿液分流的干式厕所)的人均成本估计为0.09[0.08-0.14]美元·cap-1·d-1。OP的运营和维护是人均总成本的关键驱动因素,而OP的资本成本贡献要低得多,因为它在系统生命周期(即20年)内分布在相对较多的用户(即12,000人)上。源分离情景的总排放量估计为11 [8.3-23]kg CO2当量·cap-1·年- 1,而混合排泄物的总排放量为49 [28-77]kg CO2当量·cap-1·年- 1。这两种情况都低于对坑式厕所收集的粪便污泥进行厌氧处理的温室气体(GHG)排放量的估计。源分离还为资源回收创造了机会,通过生产生物炭回收养分和固碳来抵消成本。例如,当碳的价值为150美元·毫克- 1二氧化碳时,在源分离和混合排泄物的情况下,人均卫生成本可以分别进一步降低44%和40%。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,基于热解的OP技术可以提供低成本、低温室气体的粪便污泥处理,同时缩小全球卫生差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Financial Viability and Environmental Sustainability of Fecal Sludge Treatment with Pyrolysis Omni Processors

Omni Processors (OPs) are community-scale systems for non-sewered fecal sludge treatment. These systems have demonstrated their capacity to treat excreta from tens of thousands of people using thermal treatment processes (e.g., pyrolysis), but their relative sustainability is unclear. In this study, QSDsan (an open-source Python package) was used to characterize the financial viability and environmental implications of fecal sludge treatment via pyrolysis-based OP technology treating mixed and source-separated human excreta and to elucidate the key drivers of system sustainability. Overall, the daily per capita cost for the treatment of mixed excreta (pit latrines) via the OP was estimated to be 0.05 [0.03–0.08] USD·cap–1·d–1, while the treatment of source-separated excreta (from urine-diverting dry toilets) was estimated to have a per capita cost of 0.09 [0.08–0.14] USD·cap–1·d–1. Operation and maintenance of the OP is a critical driver of total per capita cost, whereas the contribution from capital cost of the OP is much lower because it is distributed over a relatively large number of users (i.e., 12,000 people) for the system lifetime (i.e., 20 yr). The total emissions from the source-separated scenario were estimated to be 11 [8.3–23] kg CO2 eq·cap–1·yr–1, compared to 49 [28–77] kg CO2 eq·cap–1·yr–1 for mixed excreta. Both scenarios fall below the estimates of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for anaerobic treatment of fecal sludge collected from pit latrines. Source-separation also creates opportunities for resource recovery to offset costs through nutrient recovery and carbon sequestration with biochar production. For example, when carbon is valued at 150 USD·Mg–1 of CO2, the per capita cost of sanitation can be further reduced by 44 and 40% for the source-separated and mixed excreta scenarios, respectively. Overall, our results demonstrate that pyrolysis-based OP technology can provide low-cost, low-GHG fecal sludge treatment while reducing global sanitation gaps.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Environmental Au
ACS Environmental Au 环境科学-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: ACS Environmental Au is an open access journal which publishes experimental research and theoretical results in all aspects of environmental science and technology both pure and applied. Short letters comprehensive articles reviews and perspectives are welcome in the following areas:Alternative EnergyAnthropogenic Impacts on Atmosphere Soil or WaterBiogeochemical CyclingBiomass or Wastes as ResourcesContaminants in Aquatic and Terrestrial EnvironmentsEnvironmental Data ScienceEcotoxicology and Public HealthEnergy and ClimateEnvironmental Modeling Processes and Measurement Methods and TechnologiesEnvironmental Nanotechnology and BiotechnologyGreen ChemistryGreen Manufacturing and EngineeringRisk assessment Regulatory Frameworks and Life-Cycle AssessmentsTreatment and Resource Recovery and Waste Management
期刊最新文献
Solid-Phase Reactivity-Directed Extraction (SPREx): An Alternative Approach for Simultaneous Extraction, Identification, and Prioritization of Toxic Electrophiles Produced in Water Treatment Applications Issue Publication Information Issue Editorial Masthead Recent Advances in Technologies for Phosphate Removal and Recovery: A Review Microbial Community Changes across Time and Space in a Constructed Wetland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1