Flavia A Duarte, Carlos Gil Ferreira, Rodrigo Dienstmann, Bruno L Ferrari, Matheus Costa E Silva, Pedro Nazareth A Junior, Paulo Guilherme de O Salles, Paulo Henrique C Diniz
{"title":"在晚期非鳞状细胞肺癌患者中实施精准医疗的障碍:一个真实世界的证据场景。","authors":"Flavia A Duarte, Carlos Gil Ferreira, Rodrigo Dienstmann, Bruno L Ferrari, Matheus Costa E Silva, Pedro Nazareth A Junior, Paulo Guilherme de O Salles, Paulo Henrique C Diniz","doi":"10.1080/20016689.2022.2077905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Precision oncology has a prominent role in nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsNSCLC) treatment progress; however, its access in a real-world scenario might be limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the time spent in nsNSCLC molecular profile evaluation and its influence on clinical decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>nsNSCLC patients who underwent molecular testing in a private referral Brazilian center between November 2015 and February 2020 were identified. The interval from nsNSCLC diagnosis to the characterization of the molecular profile was determined. Other outcomes, focusing on the biomarker tissue journey, were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this cohort (<i>n</i> = 78), the median time between the advanced nsNSCLC diagnosis and biomarker characterization was 40.5 days (range, 29.5-68.5). The median interval between the diagnosis and the test request was longer than the interval between the request and the results (respectively 29.0 <i>versus</i> 12.0 days; <i>p</i> < 0.001). At the treatment initiation, 51% (36/71) of the patients who received any systemic therapy did not have their driver mutations panel results available. But on these, 42% (15/36) had a targetable alteration identified later on. Among patients harboring a targetable alteration, only 46% (<i>n</i> = 13/28) received a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) as first-line therapy. The median time to the TKI initiation was even longer than the median time to all treatment initiation (92.0 <i>versus</i> 40.0 days).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data show a long median time from advanced nsNSCLC diagnosis and the availability of the biomarker testing in medical practice, which impacted the choice of a non-personalized therapy as the first-line.</p>","PeriodicalId":73811,"journal":{"name":"Journal of market access & health policy","volume":" ","pages":"2077905"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1b/4d/ZJMA_10_2077905.PMC9639562.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers in precision medicine implementation among Advanced Nonsquamous Cell Lung Cancer-patients: A Real-World Evidence Scenario.\",\"authors\":\"Flavia A Duarte, Carlos Gil Ferreira, Rodrigo Dienstmann, Bruno L Ferrari, Matheus Costa E Silva, Pedro Nazareth A Junior, Paulo Guilherme de O Salles, Paulo Henrique C Diniz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20016689.2022.2077905\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Precision oncology has a prominent role in nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsNSCLC) treatment progress; however, its access in a real-world scenario might be limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the time spent in nsNSCLC molecular profile evaluation and its influence on clinical decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>nsNSCLC patients who underwent molecular testing in a private referral Brazilian center between November 2015 and February 2020 were identified. The interval from nsNSCLC diagnosis to the characterization of the molecular profile was determined. Other outcomes, focusing on the biomarker tissue journey, were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this cohort (<i>n</i> = 78), the median time between the advanced nsNSCLC diagnosis and biomarker characterization was 40.5 days (range, 29.5-68.5). The median interval between the diagnosis and the test request was longer than the interval between the request and the results (respectively 29.0 <i>versus</i> 12.0 days; <i>p</i> < 0.001). At the treatment initiation, 51% (36/71) of the patients who received any systemic therapy did not have their driver mutations panel results available. But on these, 42% (15/36) had a targetable alteration identified later on. Among patients harboring a targetable alteration, only 46% (<i>n</i> = 13/28) received a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) as first-line therapy. The median time to the TKI initiation was even longer than the median time to all treatment initiation (92.0 <i>versus</i> 40.0 days).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data show a long median time from advanced nsNSCLC diagnosis and the availability of the biomarker testing in medical practice, which impacted the choice of a non-personalized therapy as the first-line.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of market access & health policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2077905\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1b/4d/ZJMA_10_2077905.PMC9639562.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of market access & health policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2022.2077905\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of market access & health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2022.2077905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
背景:精准肿瘤学在非鳞状非小细胞肺癌(nsNSCLC)治疗进展中具有突出作用;然而,它在现实场景中的访问可能是有限的。目的:探讨nsNSCLC分子谱评估所需时间及其对临床决策的影响。方法:选取2015年11月至2020年2月期间在巴西一家私人转诊中心接受分子检测的nsNSCLC患者。确定了从nsNSCLC诊断到分子谱表征的时间间隔。其他结果,重点是生物标志物组织旅程,也进行了评估。结果:在该队列中(n = 78),晚期nsNSCLC诊断和生物标志物鉴定之间的中位时间为40.5天(范围:29.5-68.5)。诊断和测试请求之间的中位数间隔时间比请求和结果之间的间隔时间长(分别为29.0天对12.0天;p n = 13/28)接受酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)作为一线治疗。TKI启动的中位时间甚至比所有治疗启动的中位时间更长(92.0天对40.0天)。结论:我们的数据显示,晚期nsNSCLC诊断的中位时间较长,医疗实践中生物标志物检测的可用性影响了非个性化治疗作为一线治疗的选择。
Barriers in precision medicine implementation among Advanced Nonsquamous Cell Lung Cancer-patients: A Real-World Evidence Scenario.
Background: Precision oncology has a prominent role in nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsNSCLC) treatment progress; however, its access in a real-world scenario might be limited.
Objective: To investigate the time spent in nsNSCLC molecular profile evaluation and its influence on clinical decisions.
Methods: nsNSCLC patients who underwent molecular testing in a private referral Brazilian center between November 2015 and February 2020 were identified. The interval from nsNSCLC diagnosis to the characterization of the molecular profile was determined. Other outcomes, focusing on the biomarker tissue journey, were also assessed.
Results: In this cohort (n = 78), the median time between the advanced nsNSCLC diagnosis and biomarker characterization was 40.5 days (range, 29.5-68.5). The median interval between the diagnosis and the test request was longer than the interval between the request and the results (respectively 29.0 versus 12.0 days; p < 0.001). At the treatment initiation, 51% (36/71) of the patients who received any systemic therapy did not have their driver mutations panel results available. But on these, 42% (15/36) had a targetable alteration identified later on. Among patients harboring a targetable alteration, only 46% (n = 13/28) received a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) as first-line therapy. The median time to the TKI initiation was even longer than the median time to all treatment initiation (92.0 versus 40.0 days).
Conclusions: Our data show a long median time from advanced nsNSCLC diagnosis and the availability of the biomarker testing in medical practice, which impacted the choice of a non-personalized therapy as the first-line.