开发和验证一种预后模型,用于早期识别有可能出现常见长期COVID症状的COVID-19患者。

Manja Deforth, Caroline E Gebhard, Susan Bengs, Philipp K Buehler, Reto A Schuepbach, Annelies S Zinkernagel, Silvio D Brugger, Claudio T Acevedo, Dimitri Patriki, Benedikt Wiggli, Raphael Twerenbold, Gabriela M Kuster, Hans Pargger, Joerg C Schefold, Thibaud Spinetti, Pedro D Wendel-Garcia, Daniel A Hofmaenner, Bianca Gysi, Martin Siegemund, Georg Heinze, Vera Regitz-Zagrosek, Catherine Gebhard, Ulrike Held
{"title":"开发和验证一种预后模型,用于早期识别有可能出现常见长期COVID症状的COVID-19患者。","authors":"Manja Deforth,&nbsp;Caroline E Gebhard,&nbsp;Susan Bengs,&nbsp;Philipp K Buehler,&nbsp;Reto A Schuepbach,&nbsp;Annelies S Zinkernagel,&nbsp;Silvio D Brugger,&nbsp;Claudio T Acevedo,&nbsp;Dimitri Patriki,&nbsp;Benedikt Wiggli,&nbsp;Raphael Twerenbold,&nbsp;Gabriela M Kuster,&nbsp;Hans Pargger,&nbsp;Joerg C Schefold,&nbsp;Thibaud Spinetti,&nbsp;Pedro D Wendel-Garcia,&nbsp;Daniel A Hofmaenner,&nbsp;Bianca Gysi,&nbsp;Martin Siegemund,&nbsp;Georg Heinze,&nbsp;Vera Regitz-Zagrosek,&nbsp;Catherine Gebhard,&nbsp;Ulrike Held","doi":"10.1186/s41512-022-00135-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic demands reliable prognostic models for estimating the risk of long COVID. We developed and validated a prediction model to estimate the probability of known common long COVID symptoms at least 60 days after acute COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The prognostic model was built based on data from a multicentre prospective Swiss cohort study. Included were adult patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between February and December 2020 and treated as outpatients, at ward or intensive/intermediate care unit. Perceived long-term health impairments, including reduced exercise tolerance/reduced resilience, shortness of breath and/or tiredness (REST), were assessed after a follow-up time between 60 and 425 days. The data set was split into a derivation and a geographical validation cohort. Predictors were selected out of twelve candidate predictors based on three methods, namely the augmented backward elimination (ABE) method, the adaptive best-subset selection (ABESS) method and model-based recursive partitioning (MBRP) approach. Model performance was assessed with the scaled Brier score, concordance c statistic and calibration plot. The final prognostic model was determined based on best model performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 2799 patients were included in the analysis, of which 1588 patients were in the derivation cohort and 1211 patients in the validation cohort. The REST prevalence was similar between the cohorts with 21.6% (n = 343) in the derivation cohort and 22.1% (n = 268) in the validation cohort. The same predictors were selected with the ABE and ABESS approach. The final prognostic model was based on the ABE and ABESS selected predictors. The corresponding scaled Brier score in the validation cohort was 18.74%, model discrimination was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.75 to 0.81), calibration slope was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.78 to 1.06) and calibration intercept was -0.06 (95% CI: -0.22 to 0.09).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed model was validated to identify COVID-19-infected patients at high risk for REST symptoms. Before implementing the prognostic model in daily clinical practice, the conduct of an impact study is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":72800,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and prognostic research","volume":" ","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9668400/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of a prognostic model for the early identification of COVID-19 patients at risk of developing common long COVID symptoms.\",\"authors\":\"Manja Deforth,&nbsp;Caroline E Gebhard,&nbsp;Susan Bengs,&nbsp;Philipp K Buehler,&nbsp;Reto A Schuepbach,&nbsp;Annelies S Zinkernagel,&nbsp;Silvio D Brugger,&nbsp;Claudio T Acevedo,&nbsp;Dimitri Patriki,&nbsp;Benedikt Wiggli,&nbsp;Raphael Twerenbold,&nbsp;Gabriela M Kuster,&nbsp;Hans Pargger,&nbsp;Joerg C Schefold,&nbsp;Thibaud Spinetti,&nbsp;Pedro D Wendel-Garcia,&nbsp;Daniel A Hofmaenner,&nbsp;Bianca Gysi,&nbsp;Martin Siegemund,&nbsp;Georg Heinze,&nbsp;Vera Regitz-Zagrosek,&nbsp;Catherine Gebhard,&nbsp;Ulrike Held\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41512-022-00135-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic demands reliable prognostic models for estimating the risk of long COVID. We developed and validated a prediction model to estimate the probability of known common long COVID symptoms at least 60 days after acute COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The prognostic model was built based on data from a multicentre prospective Swiss cohort study. Included were adult patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between February and December 2020 and treated as outpatients, at ward or intensive/intermediate care unit. Perceived long-term health impairments, including reduced exercise tolerance/reduced resilience, shortness of breath and/or tiredness (REST), were assessed after a follow-up time between 60 and 425 days. The data set was split into a derivation and a geographical validation cohort. Predictors were selected out of twelve candidate predictors based on three methods, namely the augmented backward elimination (ABE) method, the adaptive best-subset selection (ABESS) method and model-based recursive partitioning (MBRP) approach. Model performance was assessed with the scaled Brier score, concordance c statistic and calibration plot. The final prognostic model was determined based on best model performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 2799 patients were included in the analysis, of which 1588 patients were in the derivation cohort and 1211 patients in the validation cohort. The REST prevalence was similar between the cohorts with 21.6% (n = 343) in the derivation cohort and 22.1% (n = 268) in the validation cohort. The same predictors were selected with the ABE and ABESS approach. The final prognostic model was based on the ABE and ABESS selected predictors. The corresponding scaled Brier score in the validation cohort was 18.74%, model discrimination was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.75 to 0.81), calibration slope was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.78 to 1.06) and calibration intercept was -0.06 (95% CI: -0.22 to 0.09).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed model was validated to identify COVID-19-infected patients at high risk for REST symptoms. Before implementing the prognostic model in daily clinical practice, the conduct of an impact study is recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostic and prognostic research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9668400/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostic and prognostic research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-022-00135-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and prognostic research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-022-00135-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行需要可靠的预后模型来估计长期COVID的风险。我们开发并验证了一个预测模型,以估计急性COVID-19后至少60天内已知常见长时间COVID-19症状的概率。方法:基于瑞士多中心前瞻性队列研究的数据建立预后模型。包括在2020年2月至12月期间被诊断为COVID-19的成年患者,并作为门诊患者、病房或重症/中级护理病房接受治疗。在60至425天的随访时间后,评估了感知到的长期健康损害,包括运动耐受性降低/恢复力降低、呼吸短促和/或疲劳(REST)。数据集被分为派生组和地理验证组。基于增强后向消除法(ABE)、自适应最佳子集选择法(ABESS)和基于模型的递归划分法(MBRP)从12个候选预测因子中选择预测因子。采用标度Brier评分、一致性统计量和校正图对模型性能进行评价。最终的预后模型是根据最佳模型性能确定的。结果:共纳入2799例患者,其中衍生队列1588例,验证队列1211例。两组间REST患病率相似,衍生组为21.6% (n = 343),验证组为22.1% (n = 268)。采用ABE和ABESS方法选择相同的预测因子。最终的预后模型是基于ABE和ABESS选择的预测因子。验证队列中相应的Brier评分为18.74%,模型判别率为0.78 (95% CI: 0.75 ~ 0.81),校准斜率为0.92 (95% CI: 0.78 ~ 1.06),校准截距为-0.06 (95% CI: -0.22 ~ 0.09)。结论:该模型能够有效识别REST症状高危人群。在日常临床实践中实施预后模型之前,建议进行影响研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and validation of a prognostic model for the early identification of COVID-19 patients at risk of developing common long COVID symptoms.

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic demands reliable prognostic models for estimating the risk of long COVID. We developed and validated a prediction model to estimate the probability of known common long COVID symptoms at least 60 days after acute COVID-19.

Methods: The prognostic model was built based on data from a multicentre prospective Swiss cohort study. Included were adult patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between February and December 2020 and treated as outpatients, at ward or intensive/intermediate care unit. Perceived long-term health impairments, including reduced exercise tolerance/reduced resilience, shortness of breath and/or tiredness (REST), were assessed after a follow-up time between 60 and 425 days. The data set was split into a derivation and a geographical validation cohort. Predictors were selected out of twelve candidate predictors based on three methods, namely the augmented backward elimination (ABE) method, the adaptive best-subset selection (ABESS) method and model-based recursive partitioning (MBRP) approach. Model performance was assessed with the scaled Brier score, concordance c statistic and calibration plot. The final prognostic model was determined based on best model performance.

Results: In total, 2799 patients were included in the analysis, of which 1588 patients were in the derivation cohort and 1211 patients in the validation cohort. The REST prevalence was similar between the cohorts with 21.6% (n = 343) in the derivation cohort and 22.1% (n = 268) in the validation cohort. The same predictors were selected with the ABE and ABESS approach. The final prognostic model was based on the ABE and ABESS selected predictors. The corresponding scaled Brier score in the validation cohort was 18.74%, model discrimination was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.75 to 0.81), calibration slope was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.78 to 1.06) and calibration intercept was -0.06 (95% CI: -0.22 to 0.09).

Conclusion: The proposed model was validated to identify COVID-19-infected patients at high risk for REST symptoms. Before implementing the prognostic model in daily clinical practice, the conduct of an impact study is recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Models for predicting risk of endometrial cancer: a systematic review. Risk prediction tools for pressure injury occurrence: an umbrella review of systematic reviews reporting model development and validation methods. Rehabilitation outcomes after comprehensive post-acute inpatient rehabilitation following moderate to severe acquired brain injury-study protocol for an overall prognosis study based on routinely collected health data. Validation of prognostic models predicting mortality or ICU admission in patients with COVID-19 in low- and middle-income countries: a global individual participant data meta-analysis. Reported prevalence and comparison of diagnostic approaches for Candida africana: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1