Mahrukh Zafar BDS, MS, Steven M. Levy DDS, MPH, John J. Warren DDS, MS, Xian Jin Xie PhD, Justine Kolker DDS, MS, PhD, Chandler Pendleton MS
{"title":"从9岁到23岁,非空化病变的患病率、进展、消退和无变化","authors":"Mahrukh Zafar BDS, MS, Steven M. Levy DDS, MPH, John J. Warren DDS, MS, Xian Jin Xie PhD, Justine Kolker DDS, MS, PhD, Chandler Pendleton MS","doi":"10.1111/jphd.12538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Some non-cavitated caries lesions (D<sub>1</sub>), the initial stage of caries, progress to cavitation. This article reports participant-level and surface-level D<sub>1</sub> prevalence and changes in status of D<sub>1</sub> lesions through different periods from age 9 to 23.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The Iowa Fluoride Study (IFS) participants were followed longitudinally; all permanent tooth surfaces were examined clinically for caries at ages 9, 13, 17, and 23 using standardized criteria for sound (S), questionable (D<sub>0</sub>), non-cavitated (D<sub>1</sub>), cavitated (D<sub>2+</sub>), filled (F), or missing due to decay (M). D<sub>1</sub> lesions at the beginning of each interval were reassessed at each follow-up age to determine transitions (to the 5 categories or no transition).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The sample had relatively high socioeconomic status (SES), with about 52%–55% high SES, 32–35% middle SES, and 12–13% low SES. Person-level prevalences of D<sub>1</sub> lesions were 23%, 38%, 60%, and 45% at ages 9, 13, 17, and 23, respectively. Surface-level prevalences were less than 1% at ages 9 and 13, 3% at 17, and 2% at 23. Thirteen percent of D<sub>1</sub>s at age 9 progressed at 13, 18% progressed from 13 to 17, and 11% progressed from 17 to 23. The percentages regressing (to sound or D<sub>0</sub>) were 72%, 54%, and 72%, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Non-cavitated lesions were more prevalent at age 17 than at ages 9, 13, and 23. The high rates of regression compared to progression or no change suggest that many non-cavitated lesions do not progress to cavitated lesions and could be reversed; therefore, surgical intervention should not be the treatment of choice for incipient lesions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16913,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health dentistry","volume":"82 3","pages":"313-320"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/31/3e/JPHD-82-313.PMC9544189.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of non-cavitated lesions and progression, regression, and no change from age 9 to 23 years\",\"authors\":\"Mahrukh Zafar BDS, MS, Steven M. Levy DDS, MPH, John J. Warren DDS, MS, Xian Jin Xie PhD, Justine Kolker DDS, MS, PhD, Chandler Pendleton MS\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jphd.12538\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Some non-cavitated caries lesions (D<sub>1</sub>), the initial stage of caries, progress to cavitation. This article reports participant-level and surface-level D<sub>1</sub> prevalence and changes in status of D<sub>1</sub> lesions through different periods from age 9 to 23.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The Iowa Fluoride Study (IFS) participants were followed longitudinally; all permanent tooth surfaces were examined clinically for caries at ages 9, 13, 17, and 23 using standardized criteria for sound (S), questionable (D<sub>0</sub>), non-cavitated (D<sub>1</sub>), cavitated (D<sub>2+</sub>), filled (F), or missing due to decay (M). D<sub>1</sub> lesions at the beginning of each interval were reassessed at each follow-up age to determine transitions (to the 5 categories or no transition).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The sample had relatively high socioeconomic status (SES), with about 52%–55% high SES, 32–35% middle SES, and 12–13% low SES. Person-level prevalences of D<sub>1</sub> lesions were 23%, 38%, 60%, and 45% at ages 9, 13, 17, and 23, respectively. Surface-level prevalences were less than 1% at ages 9 and 13, 3% at 17, and 2% at 23. Thirteen percent of D<sub>1</sub>s at age 9 progressed at 13, 18% progressed from 13 to 17, and 11% progressed from 17 to 23. The percentages regressing (to sound or D<sub>0</sub>) were 72%, 54%, and 72%, respectively.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Non-cavitated lesions were more prevalent at age 17 than at ages 9, 13, and 23. The high rates of regression compared to progression or no change suggest that many non-cavitated lesions do not progress to cavitated lesions and could be reversed; therefore, surgical intervention should not be the treatment of choice for incipient lesions.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of public health dentistry\",\"volume\":\"82 3\",\"pages\":\"313-320\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/31/3e/JPHD-82-313.PMC9544189.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of public health dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jphd.12538\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jphd.12538","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prevalence of non-cavitated lesions and progression, regression, and no change from age 9 to 23 years
Objectives
Some non-cavitated caries lesions (D1), the initial stage of caries, progress to cavitation. This article reports participant-level and surface-level D1 prevalence and changes in status of D1 lesions through different periods from age 9 to 23.
Methods
The Iowa Fluoride Study (IFS) participants were followed longitudinally; all permanent tooth surfaces were examined clinically for caries at ages 9, 13, 17, and 23 using standardized criteria for sound (S), questionable (D0), non-cavitated (D1), cavitated (D2+), filled (F), or missing due to decay (M). D1 lesions at the beginning of each interval were reassessed at each follow-up age to determine transitions (to the 5 categories or no transition).
Results
The sample had relatively high socioeconomic status (SES), with about 52%–55% high SES, 32–35% middle SES, and 12–13% low SES. Person-level prevalences of D1 lesions were 23%, 38%, 60%, and 45% at ages 9, 13, 17, and 23, respectively. Surface-level prevalences were less than 1% at ages 9 and 13, 3% at 17, and 2% at 23. Thirteen percent of D1s at age 9 progressed at 13, 18% progressed from 13 to 17, and 11% progressed from 17 to 23. The percentages regressing (to sound or D0) were 72%, 54%, and 72%, respectively.
Conclusion
Non-cavitated lesions were more prevalent at age 17 than at ages 9, 13, and 23. The high rates of regression compared to progression or no change suggest that many non-cavitated lesions do not progress to cavitated lesions and could be reversed; therefore, surgical intervention should not be the treatment of choice for incipient lesions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Public Health Dentistry is devoted to the advancement of public health dentistry through the exploration of related research, practice, and policy developments. Three main types of articles are published: original research articles that provide a significant contribution to knowledge in the breadth of dental public health, including oral epidemiology, dental health services, the behavioral sciences, and the public health practice areas of assessment, policy development, and assurance; methods articles that report the development and testing of new approaches to research design, data collection and analysis, or the delivery of public health services; and review articles that synthesize previous research in the discipline and provide guidance to others conducting research as well as to policy makers, managers, and other dental public health practitioners.