使用实施框架对医疗保健循证实践的促进者和障碍进行定性力场分析。

Molly McNett, Sharon Tucker, Inga Zadvinskis, Diana Tolles, Bindu Thomas, Penelope Gorsuch, Lynn Gallagher-Ford
{"title":"使用实施框架对医疗保健循证实践的促进者和障碍进行定性力场分析。","authors":"Molly McNett,&nbsp;Sharon Tucker,&nbsp;Inga Zadvinskis,&nbsp;Diana Tolles,&nbsp;Bindu Thomas,&nbsp;Penelope Gorsuch,&nbsp;Lynn Gallagher-Ford","doi":"10.1007/s43477-022-00051-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research has identified facilitators and barriers to implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs). Few studies have evaluated which factors persist among healthcare clinicians with extensive education and training on EBP implementation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine facilitators and barriers to EBP implementation across a national sample of specialty-prepared EBP mentors in healthcare settings. Healthcare clinicians participating in an immersive 5-day EBP knowledge and skill building program were invited to complete a follow-up survey 12 months later to report on implementation experiences. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided content analysis of responses. A force field analysis using Lewin's change theory was used to assign numerical 'weights' to factors. Eighty-four individuals reported facilitators and barriers to implementation. The majority occurred within the inner setting of the CFIR model. Facilitators were strong leadership engagement (<i>n</i> = 15), positive EBP culture (<i>n</i> = 9), and resources (<i>n</i> = 4). Barriers included lack of resources (<i>n</i> = 21), poor leadership engagement (<i>n</i> = 19), implementation climate (<i>n</i> = 17), lack of relative priority (<i>n</i> = 12), and organizational characteristics (<i>n</i> = 9). Respondents also identified simultaneous facilitators and barriers within the process domain of the CFIR model. The construct of stakeholder engagement was a barrier when absent from the implementation process (<i>n</i> = 23), yet was a strong facilitator when present (<i>n</i> = 23). Implementation in healthcare settings appears most effective when conducted by an interprofessional team with strong leadership, resources, stakeholder engagement, and positive EBP culture. When these same factors are absent, they remain persistent barriers to implementation, even among specialty-trained healthcare clinicians.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version of this article (10.1007/s43477-022-00051-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.</p>","PeriodicalId":73165,"journal":{"name":"Global implementation research and applications","volume":" ","pages":"195-208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9373890/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Qualitative Force Field Analysis of Facilitators and Barriers to Evidence-Based Practice in Healthcare Using an Implementation Framework.\",\"authors\":\"Molly McNett,&nbsp;Sharon Tucker,&nbsp;Inga Zadvinskis,&nbsp;Diana Tolles,&nbsp;Bindu Thomas,&nbsp;Penelope Gorsuch,&nbsp;Lynn Gallagher-Ford\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43477-022-00051-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Research has identified facilitators and barriers to implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs). Few studies have evaluated which factors persist among healthcare clinicians with extensive education and training on EBP implementation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine facilitators and barriers to EBP implementation across a national sample of specialty-prepared EBP mentors in healthcare settings. Healthcare clinicians participating in an immersive 5-day EBP knowledge and skill building program were invited to complete a follow-up survey 12 months later to report on implementation experiences. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided content analysis of responses. A force field analysis using Lewin's change theory was used to assign numerical 'weights' to factors. Eighty-four individuals reported facilitators and barriers to implementation. The majority occurred within the inner setting of the CFIR model. Facilitators were strong leadership engagement (<i>n</i> = 15), positive EBP culture (<i>n</i> = 9), and resources (<i>n</i> = 4). Barriers included lack of resources (<i>n</i> = 21), poor leadership engagement (<i>n</i> = 19), implementation climate (<i>n</i> = 17), lack of relative priority (<i>n</i> = 12), and organizational characteristics (<i>n</i> = 9). Respondents also identified simultaneous facilitators and barriers within the process domain of the CFIR model. The construct of stakeholder engagement was a barrier when absent from the implementation process (<i>n</i> = 23), yet was a strong facilitator when present (<i>n</i> = 23). Implementation in healthcare settings appears most effective when conducted by an interprofessional team with strong leadership, resources, stakeholder engagement, and positive EBP culture. When these same factors are absent, they remain persistent barriers to implementation, even among specialty-trained healthcare clinicians.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version of this article (10.1007/s43477-022-00051-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global implementation research and applications\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"195-208\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9373890/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global implementation research and applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43477-022-00051-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/8/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global implementation research and applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43477-022-00051-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

研究已经确定了实施循证实践(ebp)的促进因素和障碍。很少有研究评估了在EBP实施方面接受过广泛教育和培训的医疗保健临床医生中存在哪些因素。因此,本研究的目的是检查在医疗保健机构中专门准备的EBP导师的全国样本中实施EBP的促进因素和障碍。参加为期5天的沉浸式EBP知识和技能建设项目的医疗保健临床医生被邀请在12个月后完成一项随访调查,报告实施经验。实施研究综合框架(CFIR)指导了回应的内容分析。利用Lewin变化理论进行力场分析,为因子分配数值“权重”。84个人报告了实施的促进因素和障碍。大多数发生在CFIR模型的内部设置中。促进因素是强领导参与(n = 15),积极的EBP文化(n = 9)和资源(n = 4)。障碍包括缺乏资源(n = 21)、领导参与度差(n = 19)、实施氛围(n = 17)、缺乏相对优先级(n = 12)和组织特征(n = 9)。受访者还确定了在CFIR模型的过程域中同时存在的促进因素和障碍。利益相关者参与的构建在实施过程中是一个障碍(n = 23),但在存在时是一个强大的促进者(n = 23)。在医疗保健环境中,由具有强有力的领导、资源、利益相关者参与和积极的EBP文化的跨专业团队进行实施,似乎是最有效的。当这些相同的因素不存在时,它们仍然是实施的持久障碍,即使在受过专业培训的医疗保健临床医生中也是如此。补充信息:本文的在线版本(10.1007/s43477-022-00051-6)包含补充信息,仅供授权用户使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Qualitative Force Field Analysis of Facilitators and Barriers to Evidence-Based Practice in Healthcare Using an Implementation Framework.

Research has identified facilitators and barriers to implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs). Few studies have evaluated which factors persist among healthcare clinicians with extensive education and training on EBP implementation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine facilitators and barriers to EBP implementation across a national sample of specialty-prepared EBP mentors in healthcare settings. Healthcare clinicians participating in an immersive 5-day EBP knowledge and skill building program were invited to complete a follow-up survey 12 months later to report on implementation experiences. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided content analysis of responses. A force field analysis using Lewin's change theory was used to assign numerical 'weights' to factors. Eighty-four individuals reported facilitators and barriers to implementation. The majority occurred within the inner setting of the CFIR model. Facilitators were strong leadership engagement (n = 15), positive EBP culture (n = 9), and resources (n = 4). Barriers included lack of resources (n = 21), poor leadership engagement (n = 19), implementation climate (n = 17), lack of relative priority (n = 12), and organizational characteristics (n = 9). Respondents also identified simultaneous facilitators and barriers within the process domain of the CFIR model. The construct of stakeholder engagement was a barrier when absent from the implementation process (n = 23), yet was a strong facilitator when present (n = 23). Implementation in healthcare settings appears most effective when conducted by an interprofessional team with strong leadership, resources, stakeholder engagement, and positive EBP culture. When these same factors are absent, they remain persistent barriers to implementation, even among specialty-trained healthcare clinicians.

Supplementary information: The online version of this article (10.1007/s43477-022-00051-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conceptualisation of the SHIFT–SHARE: A New Strategic Healthcare Implementation Framework for Task Shifting, Sharing and Resource Enhancement Identifying and Prioritizing Factors to Improve Implementation of an Evidence-Based Program for Child Maltreatment Prevention in Rural Missouri Communities Implementation Determinants of Problem-Solving Therapy Delivered by Near-Peer Lay Counselors for Youth Living with HIV in Botswana: Lay Counsellor Perspectives Exploring Behaviour Change of Healthcare Professionals while Implementing a Complex Nursing Intervention: A Survey Study Usability Testing of a Web Tool for Dissemination and Implementation Science Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1