新冠肺炎大流行期间大学生的技术压力、应对和焦虑抑郁症状

IF 1.8 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Europes Journal of Psychology Pub Date : 2022-08-31 eCollection Date: 2022-08-01 DOI:10.5964/ejop.4725
John Galvin, Michael Scott Evans, Kenisha Nelson, Gareth Richards, Eirini Mavritsaki, Theodoros Giovazolias, Katerina Koutra, Ben Mellor, Maria Clelia Zurlo, Andrew Paul Smith, Federica Vallone
{"title":"新冠肺炎大流行期间大学生的技术压力、应对和焦虑抑郁症状","authors":"John Galvin,&nbsp;Michael Scott Evans,&nbsp;Kenisha Nelson,&nbsp;Gareth Richards,&nbsp;Eirini Mavritsaki,&nbsp;Theodoros Giovazolias,&nbsp;Katerina Koutra,&nbsp;Ben Mellor,&nbsp;Maria Clelia Zurlo,&nbsp;Andrew Paul Smith,&nbsp;Federica Vallone","doi":"10.5964/ejop.4725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic raised many challenges for university staff and students, including the need to work from home, which resulted in a greater reliance on technology. We collected questionnaire data from university students (N = 894) in three European countries: Greece, Italy, and the United Kingdom. Data were collected between 7th April 2020 and 19th June 2020, representing a period covering the first lockdown and university closures in these countries and across Europe generally. We tested the hypotheses that technology-related stressors (techno-overload, work-home conflict, techno-ease, techno-reliability, techno-sociality, and pace of change) would be associated with anxiety and depressive symptoms, and that coping styles (problem-focused, emotion-focused, and avoidance) would mediate these relationships. Results showed significant positive associations between techno-overload, work-home conflict and anxiety and depressive symptoms, and significant negative associations between techno-reliability, techno-ease and anxiety and depressive symptoms. A significant negative association was found between techno-sociality and depressive symptoms but not anxiety symptoms. No evidence was found for an association between pace of change and anxiety or depressive symptoms. Multiple mediation analyses revealed significant direct effects of techno-overload, work-home conflict and techno-ease on anxiety symptoms, and of work-home conflict and techno-ease on depressive symptoms. Work-home conflict had significant indirect effects on anxiety and depressive symptoms through avoidance coping. Techno-overload and techno-ease both had significant indirect effects on anxiety symptoms through problem- and emotion-focused coping. Techno-ease also had a significant indirect effect on depressive symptoms through problem-focused coping. The findings add to the body of evidence on technostress amongst university students and provide knowledge on how technostress translates through coping strategies into anxious and depressive symptoms during the disruption caused by the outbreak of a pandemic disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":47113,"journal":{"name":"Europes Journal of Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9632553/pdf/","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technostress, Coping, and Anxious and Depressive Symptomatology in University Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"John Galvin,&nbsp;Michael Scott Evans,&nbsp;Kenisha Nelson,&nbsp;Gareth Richards,&nbsp;Eirini Mavritsaki,&nbsp;Theodoros Giovazolias,&nbsp;Katerina Koutra,&nbsp;Ben Mellor,&nbsp;Maria Clelia Zurlo,&nbsp;Andrew Paul Smith,&nbsp;Federica Vallone\",\"doi\":\"10.5964/ejop.4725\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic raised many challenges for university staff and students, including the need to work from home, which resulted in a greater reliance on technology. We collected questionnaire data from university students (N = 894) in three European countries: Greece, Italy, and the United Kingdom. Data were collected between 7th April 2020 and 19th June 2020, representing a period covering the first lockdown and university closures in these countries and across Europe generally. We tested the hypotheses that technology-related stressors (techno-overload, work-home conflict, techno-ease, techno-reliability, techno-sociality, and pace of change) would be associated with anxiety and depressive symptoms, and that coping styles (problem-focused, emotion-focused, and avoidance) would mediate these relationships. Results showed significant positive associations between techno-overload, work-home conflict and anxiety and depressive symptoms, and significant negative associations between techno-reliability, techno-ease and anxiety and depressive symptoms. A significant negative association was found between techno-sociality and depressive symptoms but not anxiety symptoms. No evidence was found for an association between pace of change and anxiety or depressive symptoms. Multiple mediation analyses revealed significant direct effects of techno-overload, work-home conflict and techno-ease on anxiety symptoms, and of work-home conflict and techno-ease on depressive symptoms. Work-home conflict had significant indirect effects on anxiety and depressive symptoms through avoidance coping. Techno-overload and techno-ease both had significant indirect effects on anxiety symptoms through problem- and emotion-focused coping. Techno-ease also had a significant indirect effect on depressive symptoms through problem-focused coping. The findings add to the body of evidence on technostress amongst university students and provide knowledge on how technostress translates through coping strategies into anxious and depressive symptoms during the disruption caused by the outbreak of a pandemic disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Europes Journal of Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9632553/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Europes Journal of Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.4725\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europes Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.4725","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

2019冠状病毒病大流行给大学教职员工和学生带来了许多挑战,包括需要在家工作,这导致他们更加依赖技术。我们收集了来自三个欧洲国家:希腊、意大利和英国的大学生的问卷调查数据(N = 894)。数据是在2020年4月7日至2020年6月19日期间收集的,这段时间涵盖了这些国家和整个欧洲的首次封锁和大学关闭。我们测试了与技术相关的压力源(技术超载、工作与家庭冲突、技术安逸、技术可靠性、技术社会性和变革速度)与焦虑和抑郁症状相关的假设,以及应对方式(问题关注、情绪关注和回避)将调解这些关系的假设。结果显示,技术超载、工作-家庭冲突与焦虑抑郁症状呈显著正相关,技术可靠性、技术安逸与焦虑抑郁症状呈显著负相关。技术社交与抑郁症状呈显著负相关,但与焦虑症状无显著负相关。没有证据表明变化的速度与焦虑或抑郁症状之间存在关联。多重中介分析显示,技术超载、工作-家庭冲突和技术缓解对焦虑症状有显著的直接影响,工作-家庭冲突和技术缓解对抑郁症状有显著的直接影响。工作家庭冲突通过回避应对对焦虑和抑郁症状有显著的间接影响。通过以问题和情绪为中心的应对,技术超载和技术放松对焦虑症状都有显著的间接影响。科技轻松也通过问题聚焦应对对抑郁症状有显著的间接影响。这些发现增加了关于大学生技术压力的证据,并提供了关于技术压力如何通过应对策略转化为焦虑和抑郁症状的知识,这些症状是在流行病爆发造成的中断期间发生的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Technostress, Coping, and Anxious and Depressive Symptomatology in University Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic raised many challenges for university staff and students, including the need to work from home, which resulted in a greater reliance on technology. We collected questionnaire data from university students (N = 894) in three European countries: Greece, Italy, and the United Kingdom. Data were collected between 7th April 2020 and 19th June 2020, representing a period covering the first lockdown and university closures in these countries and across Europe generally. We tested the hypotheses that technology-related stressors (techno-overload, work-home conflict, techno-ease, techno-reliability, techno-sociality, and pace of change) would be associated with anxiety and depressive symptoms, and that coping styles (problem-focused, emotion-focused, and avoidance) would mediate these relationships. Results showed significant positive associations between techno-overload, work-home conflict and anxiety and depressive symptoms, and significant negative associations between techno-reliability, techno-ease and anxiety and depressive symptoms. A significant negative association was found between techno-sociality and depressive symptoms but not anxiety symptoms. No evidence was found for an association between pace of change and anxiety or depressive symptoms. Multiple mediation analyses revealed significant direct effects of techno-overload, work-home conflict and techno-ease on anxiety symptoms, and of work-home conflict and techno-ease on depressive symptoms. Work-home conflict had significant indirect effects on anxiety and depressive symptoms through avoidance coping. Techno-overload and techno-ease both had significant indirect effects on anxiety symptoms through problem- and emotion-focused coping. Techno-ease also had a significant indirect effect on depressive symptoms through problem-focused coping. The findings add to the body of evidence on technostress amongst university students and provide knowledge on how technostress translates through coping strategies into anxious and depressive symptoms during the disruption caused by the outbreak of a pandemic disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Europes Journal of Psychology
Europes Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
31 weeks
期刊最新文献
An Ecological Approach to Conceptual Thinking in Material Engagement. Babies in the Corporeal Turn: The Cognitive Embodiment of Early Motor Development and Exploration in the Brazilian Context of Early Childhood Education. Gestures, Objects, and Spaces: Exploring Teachers' Multimodal Communication in Nursery Schools. Material Engagement Shaping Participation of Children on the Autism Spectrum: Embodiment and Subjectivity in Small-Group Learning. Materiality and Cognitive Development: Contemporary Debates and Empirical Studies in Early Childhood.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1