慢性疼痛患者的自我药疗与现代和补充替代药物。

IF 0.8 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice Pub Date : 2022-08-18 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_14_22
Indu Jangra, Ashok Kumar Dubey, Ekta Arora, Basit Iqbal Peerzada
{"title":"慢性疼痛患者的自我药疗与现代和补充替代药物。","authors":"Indu Jangra,&nbsp;Ashok Kumar Dubey,&nbsp;Ekta Arora,&nbsp;Basit Iqbal Peerzada","doi":"10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_14_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed to assess the prevalence, pattern, and determinants of the self-medication practices with modern and/or complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies in patients with chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted between August 2021 and January 2022 and assessed a representative sample of chronic pain patients visiting outpatient departments in India by administering a semi-structured questionnaire. The survey questionnaire consisted of forty multiple response items, including ten questions that assessed the subjects' sociodemographic profile, for example, age, sex, education, marital status, employment status, residence, and distance of home from any health care facility. The next part of the questionnaire evaluated the practice and determinants of self-medication for chronic pain with modern or CAM therapies. It included thirty questions assessing the reasons, duration, sources of information, procurement methods, preference for a particular system of medicine, knowledge about risks or drug interactions, rationality, perception of the subject, and communication with the physician, among other aspects of self-medication for pain.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Out of the 325 respondents with chronic pain, those who practiced self-medication (237) were significantly more in number than those who did not (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Among those who self-medicated, the practice was significantly higher in urban participants living closer to healthcare facilities, with better economic backgrounds and higher education (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Modern medicine was the predominant choice of self-treatment for chronic pain compared to various CAM therapies (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Among the alternatives, homeopathic and ayurvedic systems of medicines were preferred. The main reasons for self-medicating were urgency, ease, previous prescriptions, and presumed mildness of the underlying disease. More than one-third of the respondents opined in favor of continuing self-medication in the future.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalent practice of self-medication for chronic pain may not be hazardous, but it can turn into a serious problem if not based on correct information. The inherent risks need to be minimized by increasing awareness, health education, and pharmacy regulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":17158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","volume":"11 1","pages":"19-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/06/9f/JRPP-11-19.PMC9585802.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-Medication with Modern and Complementary Alternative Medicines in Patients with Chronic Pain.\",\"authors\":\"Indu Jangra,&nbsp;Ashok Kumar Dubey,&nbsp;Ekta Arora,&nbsp;Basit Iqbal Peerzada\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_14_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed to assess the prevalence, pattern, and determinants of the self-medication practices with modern and/or complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies in patients with chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted between August 2021 and January 2022 and assessed a representative sample of chronic pain patients visiting outpatient departments in India by administering a semi-structured questionnaire. The survey questionnaire consisted of forty multiple response items, including ten questions that assessed the subjects' sociodemographic profile, for example, age, sex, education, marital status, employment status, residence, and distance of home from any health care facility. The next part of the questionnaire evaluated the practice and determinants of self-medication for chronic pain with modern or CAM therapies. It included thirty questions assessing the reasons, duration, sources of information, procurement methods, preference for a particular system of medicine, knowledge about risks or drug interactions, rationality, perception of the subject, and communication with the physician, among other aspects of self-medication for pain.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Out of the 325 respondents with chronic pain, those who practiced self-medication (237) were significantly more in number than those who did not (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Among those who self-medicated, the practice was significantly higher in urban participants living closer to healthcare facilities, with better economic backgrounds and higher education (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Modern medicine was the predominant choice of self-treatment for chronic pain compared to various CAM therapies (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Among the alternatives, homeopathic and ayurvedic systems of medicines were preferred. The main reasons for self-medicating were urgency, ease, previous prescriptions, and presumed mildness of the underlying disease. More than one-third of the respondents opined in favor of continuing self-medication in the future.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalent practice of self-medication for chronic pain may not be hazardous, but it can turn into a serious problem if not based on correct information. The inherent risks need to be minimized by increasing awareness, health education, and pharmacy regulations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"19-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/06/9f/JRPP-11-19.PMC9585802.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_14_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_14_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估慢性疼痛患者采用现代和/或补充和替代医学(CAM)疗法进行自我药疗的流行程度、模式和决定因素。方法:描述性横断面研究于2021年8月至2022年1月进行,并通过管理半结构化问卷对印度门诊慢性疼痛患者的代表性样本进行评估。调查问卷由40个多重回答项目组成,其中10个问题评估了受试者的社会人口特征,例如年龄、性别、教育程度、婚姻状况、就业状况、居住地以及家与任何医疗机构的距离。问卷的下一部分评估的做法和决定因素自我药物治疗慢性疼痛与现代或CAM疗法。它包括30个问题,评估原因、持续时间、信息来源、采购方法、对特定药物系统的偏好、对风险或药物相互作用的了解、合理性、对主题的感知、与医生的沟通,以及自我治疗疼痛的其他方面。结果:325例慢性疼痛患者中,自我药疗者237例,明显多于未自我药疗者(P < 0.05)。在自我用药的人群中,居住在离医疗机构较近、经济背景较好、受教育程度较高的城市参与者的自我用药率显著较高(P < 0.05)。自我治疗慢性疼痛的选择以现代医学为主(P < 0.05)。在替代方案中,顺势疗法和阿育吠陀系统的药物是首选。自我用药的主要原因是紧急、方便、既往处方和假定的基础疾病轻微。超过三分之一的受访者赞成未来继续自我药物治疗。结论:对慢性疼痛进行自我药疗的普遍做法可能并不危险,但如果不基于正确的信息,可能会变成一个严重的问题。需要通过提高认识、开展健康教育和制定药学法规,将固有风险降至最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Self-Medication with Modern and Complementary Alternative Medicines in Patients with Chronic Pain.

Objective: The study aimed to assess the prevalence, pattern, and determinants of the self-medication practices with modern and/or complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies in patients with chronic pain.

Methods: The descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted between August 2021 and January 2022 and assessed a representative sample of chronic pain patients visiting outpatient departments in India by administering a semi-structured questionnaire. The survey questionnaire consisted of forty multiple response items, including ten questions that assessed the subjects' sociodemographic profile, for example, age, sex, education, marital status, employment status, residence, and distance of home from any health care facility. The next part of the questionnaire evaluated the practice and determinants of self-medication for chronic pain with modern or CAM therapies. It included thirty questions assessing the reasons, duration, sources of information, procurement methods, preference for a particular system of medicine, knowledge about risks or drug interactions, rationality, perception of the subject, and communication with the physician, among other aspects of self-medication for pain.

Findings: Out of the 325 respondents with chronic pain, those who practiced self-medication (237) were significantly more in number than those who did not (P < 0.05). Among those who self-medicated, the practice was significantly higher in urban participants living closer to healthcare facilities, with better economic backgrounds and higher education (P < 0.05). Modern medicine was the predominant choice of self-treatment for chronic pain compared to various CAM therapies (P < 0.05). Among the alternatives, homeopathic and ayurvedic systems of medicines were preferred. The main reasons for self-medicating were urgency, ease, previous prescriptions, and presumed mildness of the underlying disease. More than one-third of the respondents opined in favor of continuing self-medication in the future.

Conclusion: The prevalent practice of self-medication for chronic pain may not be hazardous, but it can turn into a serious problem if not based on correct information. The inherent risks need to be minimized by increasing awareness, health education, and pharmacy regulations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice
Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: The main focus of the journal will be on evidence-based drug-related medical researches (with clinical pharmacists’ intervention or documentation), particularly in the Eastern Mediterranean region. However, a wide range of closely related issues will be also covered. These will include clinical studies in the field of pharmaceutical care, reporting adverse drug reactions and human medical toxicology, pharmaco-epidemiology and toxico-epidemiology (poisoning epidemiology), social aspects of pharmacy practice, pharmacy education and economic evaluations of treatment protocols (e.g. cost-effectiveness studies). Local reports of medication utilization studies at hospital or pharmacy levels will only be considered for peer-review process only if they have a new and useful message for the international pharmacy practice professionals and readers.
期刊最新文献
Association of Gestational Iron-deficiency Anemia with Antenatal Depression among Pregnant Women: A Case-control Study from Tertiary Care Hospitals, Lahore. Is there a Possible Association between Multiple Myeloma Relapse and Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination? A Case Report. Pharmacists' Counseling and Benzodiazepines Dispensing for Sleep Disorders: A Simulated Patient Study in Iran. The Critical Role of Ward-Based and Satellite Pharmacists in Improving Pharmaceutical Care in Hospital. Topical Medroxyprogesterone Acetate and Corneal Epithelium Healing after Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Randomized, Double-masked Contralateral Eye Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1