妇女接受以人为本的计划生育护理的经验:社会人口学特征的差异

Q2 Medicine Contraception: X Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.conx.2022.100081
Kate Welti, Jennifer Manlove, Jane Finocharo, Bianca Faccio, Lisa Kim
{"title":"妇女接受以人为本的计划生育护理的经验:社会人口学特征的差异","authors":"Kate Welti,&nbsp;Jennifer Manlove,&nbsp;Jane Finocharo,&nbsp;Bianca Faccio,&nbsp;Lisa Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2022.100081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Person-centered contraceptive care is associated with positive reproductive health outcomes. Our objective was to analyze patients’ ratings on the newly developed Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling scale (PCCC) to provide distributions for a nationally representative population and to assess differences by sociodemographic characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Using data from 2017 to 2019 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), we analyzed ratings across the four PCCC items among 2242 women who received contraceptive counseling in the past year. Items measured patients’ reports of how providers respected them, let them describe their contraceptive preferences, took their preferences seriously, and adequately informed them about their options. We studied each PCCC item individually as well as the combined scale, distinguishing between ratings of “excellent” versus lower ratings. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models assessed how patients’ characteristics (age, race/ethnicity and English proficiency, sexual orientation, income, and parity) and provider type were associated with the likelihood of experiencing person-centered care.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The majority of women (59%–69%) reported that their family planning provider was “excellent” across the four PCCC items and just over half (51%) reported “excellent” on all items. In multivariate analyses, having a lower income, Black race, non-heterosexual identity, and Hispanic ethnicity combined with low English proficiency were associated with lower PCCC ratings.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In a nationally representative sample, the PCCC captured variation in women's experiences with person-centered family planning care by sociodemographic characteristics. Findings highlight the need for contraceptive counseling that centers on clients’ preferences and experiences, particularly for patients who belong to groups experiencing health inequities.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Person-centered care is a key component of high-quality family planning services. This analysis highlights sociodemographic disparities in person-centered care by analyzing PCCC ratings. Findings show the value of this new health care performance measure and affirm the need for family planning care that centers individuals' preferences and lived experiences.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100081"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/52/80/main.PMC9372601.pdf","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Women's experiences with person-centered family planning care: Differences by sociodemographic characteristics\",\"authors\":\"Kate Welti,&nbsp;Jennifer Manlove,&nbsp;Jane Finocharo,&nbsp;Bianca Faccio,&nbsp;Lisa Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conx.2022.100081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Person-centered contraceptive care is associated with positive reproductive health outcomes. Our objective was to analyze patients’ ratings on the newly developed Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling scale (PCCC) to provide distributions for a nationally representative population and to assess differences by sociodemographic characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Using data from 2017 to 2019 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), we analyzed ratings across the four PCCC items among 2242 women who received contraceptive counseling in the past year. Items measured patients’ reports of how providers respected them, let them describe their contraceptive preferences, took their preferences seriously, and adequately informed them about their options. We studied each PCCC item individually as well as the combined scale, distinguishing between ratings of “excellent” versus lower ratings. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models assessed how patients’ characteristics (age, race/ethnicity and English proficiency, sexual orientation, income, and parity) and provider type were associated with the likelihood of experiencing person-centered care.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The majority of women (59%–69%) reported that their family planning provider was “excellent” across the four PCCC items and just over half (51%) reported “excellent” on all items. In multivariate analyses, having a lower income, Black race, non-heterosexual identity, and Hispanic ethnicity combined with low English proficiency were associated with lower PCCC ratings.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In a nationally representative sample, the PCCC captured variation in women's experiences with person-centered family planning care by sociodemographic characteristics. Findings highlight the need for contraceptive counseling that centers on clients’ preferences and experiences, particularly for patients who belong to groups experiencing health inequities.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Person-centered care is a key component of high-quality family planning services. This analysis highlights sociodemographic disparities in person-centered care by analyzing PCCC ratings. Findings show the value of this new health care performance measure and affirm the need for family planning care that centers individuals' preferences and lived experiences.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception: X\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100081\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/52/80/main.PMC9372601.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151622000107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151622000107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

目的:以人为本的避孕护理与积极的生殖健康结果相关。我们的目的是分析患者对新开发的以人为中心的避孕咨询量表(PCCC)的评分,以提供全国代表性人群的分布,并评估社会人口统计学特征的差异。研究设计利用2017年至2019年全国家庭增长调查(NSFG)的数据,我们分析了2242名在过去一年中接受避孕咨询的女性在四个PCCC项目中的评分。项目衡量病人报告的提供者如何尊重他们,让他们描述他们的避孕偏好,认真对待他们的偏好,并充分告知他们的选择。我们分别研究了每个PCCC项目以及综合量表,区分了“优秀”评级和较低评级。双变量和多变量logistic回归模型评估了患者的特征(年龄、种族/民族和英语水平、性取向、收入和平价)和提供者类型如何与体验以人为本的护理的可能性相关。结果大多数女性(59%-69%)报告称,她们的计划生育服务提供者在PCCC的四个项目中都是“优秀”的,略超过一半(51%)的人认为所有项目都是“优秀”的。在多变量分析中,收入较低、黑人种族、非异性恋身份、西班牙裔以及英语水平较低与较低的PCCC评分相关。结论在一个具有全国代表性的样本中,PCCC通过社会人口学特征捕获了妇女以人为本的计划生育护理经历的变化。研究结果强调需要以客户的偏好和经验为中心进行避孕咨询,特别是对于属于健康不平等群体的患者。以人为本的护理是高质量计划生育服务的关键组成部分。本分析通过分析PCCC评级强调了以人为中心的护理的社会人口差异。调查结果显示了这种新的医疗保健绩效衡量的价值,并肯定了以个人偏好和生活经历为中心的计划生育护理的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Women's experiences with person-centered family planning care: Differences by sociodemographic characteristics

Objective

Person-centered contraceptive care is associated with positive reproductive health outcomes. Our objective was to analyze patients’ ratings on the newly developed Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling scale (PCCC) to provide distributions for a nationally representative population and to assess differences by sociodemographic characteristics.

Study design

Using data from 2017 to 2019 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), we analyzed ratings across the four PCCC items among 2242 women who received contraceptive counseling in the past year. Items measured patients’ reports of how providers respected them, let them describe their contraceptive preferences, took their preferences seriously, and adequately informed them about their options. We studied each PCCC item individually as well as the combined scale, distinguishing between ratings of “excellent” versus lower ratings. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models assessed how patients’ characteristics (age, race/ethnicity and English proficiency, sexual orientation, income, and parity) and provider type were associated with the likelihood of experiencing person-centered care.

Results

The majority of women (59%–69%) reported that their family planning provider was “excellent” across the four PCCC items and just over half (51%) reported “excellent” on all items. In multivariate analyses, having a lower income, Black race, non-heterosexual identity, and Hispanic ethnicity combined with low English proficiency were associated with lower PCCC ratings.

Conclusions

In a nationally representative sample, the PCCC captured variation in women's experiences with person-centered family planning care by sociodemographic characteristics. Findings highlight the need for contraceptive counseling that centers on clients’ preferences and experiences, particularly for patients who belong to groups experiencing health inequities.

Implications

Person-centered care is a key component of high-quality family planning services. This analysis highlights sociodemographic disparities in person-centered care by analyzing PCCC ratings. Findings show the value of this new health care performance measure and affirm the need for family planning care that centers individuals' preferences and lived experiences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contraception: X
Contraception: X Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Outpatient medical management of later second trimester abortion (18–23.6 weeks) with procedural evacuation backup: A large case series Experiences of delay-causing obstacles and mental health at the time of abortion seeking Maximizing the effectiveness of 1.5 mg levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: The case for precoital use How does person-centered maternity care relate to postpartum contraceptive counseling and use? Evidence from a longitudinal study of women delivering at health facilities in Ethiopia Dilation and evacuation versus medication abortion at 15–24 weeks of gestation in low-middle income country: A retrospective cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1