COPD患者急性高碳酸血症呼吸衰竭加重后的长期无创通气:一项随机对照试验。

IF 1.8 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM European Clinical Respiratory Journal Pub Date : 2023-09-18 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20018525.2023.2257993
Caroline Hedsund, Kasper Linde Ankjærgaard, Tine Peick Sonne, Philip Tønnesen, Ejvind Frausing Hansen, Helle Frost Andreassen, Ronan M G Berg, Jens-Ulrik Stæhr Jensen, Jon Torgny Wilcke
{"title":"COPD患者急性高碳酸血症呼吸衰竭加重后的长期无创通气:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Caroline Hedsund,&nbsp;Kasper Linde Ankjærgaard,&nbsp;Tine Peick Sonne,&nbsp;Philip Tønnesen,&nbsp;Ejvind Frausing Hansen,&nbsp;Helle Frost Andreassen,&nbsp;Ronan M G Berg,&nbsp;Jens-Ulrik Stæhr Jensen,&nbsp;Jon Torgny Wilcke","doi":"10.1080/20018525.2023.2257993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>It remains unclear whether long-term non-invasive ventilation (LT-NIV) for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) improves survival and reduces admissions as results from randomized trials are inconsistent. We aim to determine whether LT-NIV initiated after an admission with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (AHRF) can affect survival and admission rate in COPD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled open-label trial, allocating patients with COPD to LT-NIV or standard of care immediately after an admission with AHRF treated with acute NIV. LT-NIV was aimed to normalize PaCO<sub>2</sub> using high-pressure NIV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study was discontinued before full sample size due to slow recruitment. 28 patients were randomized to LT-NIV and 27 patients to standard of care. 42% of patients had a history of ≥ 2 admissions with AHRF. Median IPAP was 24 cmH<sub>2</sub>O (IQR 20-28). The primary outcome, time to readmission with AHRF or death within 12 months, did not reach significance, hazard ratio 0.53 (95% CI 0.25-1.12) <i>p</i> = 0.097. In a competing risk analysis, adjusted for history of AHRF, the odds ratio for AHRF within 12 months was 0.30 (95% CI 0.11-0.87) <i>p</i> = 0.024. The LT-NIV group had less exacerbations (median 1 (0-1) vs 2 (1-4) <i>p</i> = 0.021) and readmissions with AHRF (median 0 (0-1) vs 1 (0-1) <i>p</i> = 0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The risk of the primary outcome, time to readmission with AHRF or death within 12 months was numerically smaller in the LT-NIV group, however, did not reach significance. Nevertheless, several secondary outcome analyses like risk of AHRF, number of episodes of AHRF and exacerbations were all significantly reduced in favour of high-pressure LT-NIV, especially in patients with frequent AHRF.</p>","PeriodicalId":11872,"journal":{"name":"European Clinical Respiratory Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/85/02/ZECR_10_2257993.PMC10512815.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term non-invasive ventilation for COPD patients following an exacerbation with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Caroline Hedsund,&nbsp;Kasper Linde Ankjærgaard,&nbsp;Tine Peick Sonne,&nbsp;Philip Tønnesen,&nbsp;Ejvind Frausing Hansen,&nbsp;Helle Frost Andreassen,&nbsp;Ronan M G Berg,&nbsp;Jens-Ulrik Stæhr Jensen,&nbsp;Jon Torgny Wilcke\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20018525.2023.2257993\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>It remains unclear whether long-term non-invasive ventilation (LT-NIV) for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) improves survival and reduces admissions as results from randomized trials are inconsistent. We aim to determine whether LT-NIV initiated after an admission with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (AHRF) can affect survival and admission rate in COPD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled open-label trial, allocating patients with COPD to LT-NIV or standard of care immediately after an admission with AHRF treated with acute NIV. LT-NIV was aimed to normalize PaCO<sub>2</sub> using high-pressure NIV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study was discontinued before full sample size due to slow recruitment. 28 patients were randomized to LT-NIV and 27 patients to standard of care. 42% of patients had a history of ≥ 2 admissions with AHRF. Median IPAP was 24 cmH<sub>2</sub>O (IQR 20-28). The primary outcome, time to readmission with AHRF or death within 12 months, did not reach significance, hazard ratio 0.53 (95% CI 0.25-1.12) <i>p</i> = 0.097. In a competing risk analysis, adjusted for history of AHRF, the odds ratio for AHRF within 12 months was 0.30 (95% CI 0.11-0.87) <i>p</i> = 0.024. The LT-NIV group had less exacerbations (median 1 (0-1) vs 2 (1-4) <i>p</i> = 0.021) and readmissions with AHRF (median 0 (0-1) vs 1 (0-1) <i>p</i> = 0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The risk of the primary outcome, time to readmission with AHRF or death within 12 months was numerically smaller in the LT-NIV group, however, did not reach significance. Nevertheless, several secondary outcome analyses like risk of AHRF, number of episodes of AHRF and exacerbations were all significantly reduced in favour of high-pressure LT-NIV, especially in patients with frequent AHRF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Clinical Respiratory Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/85/02/ZECR_10_2257993.PMC10512815.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Clinical Respiratory Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2023.2257993\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Clinical Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2023.2257993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:由于随机试验的结果不一致,目前尚不清楚慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者的长期无创通气(LT-NIV)是否能提高生存率并减少入院人数。我们的目的是确定急性高碳酸血症呼吸衰竭(AHRF)患者入院后开始的LT-NIV是否会影响COPD患者的生存率和入院率。方法:一项随机对照开放标签试验,将COPD患者分配到LT-NIV或标准护理,在接受AHRF治疗后立即接受急性NIV治疗。LT-NIV旨在使用高压NIV使PaCO2标准化。结果:由于招募缓慢,该研究在完全样本量之前停止。28名患者随机接受LT-NIV治疗,27名患者接受标准护理。42%的患者有 ≥ 2例AHRF患者入院。IPAP中位数为24 cmH2O(IQR 20-28)。主要结果,AHRF再次入院时间或12年内死亡 月,未达到显著性,危险比0.53(95%CI 0.25-1.12)p = 0.097.在竞争性风险分析中,经AHRF病史调整后,AHRF的比值比在12以内 月为0.30(95%CI 0.11-0.87)p = 0.024.LT-NIV组的病情恶化较少(中位数1(0-1)vs 2(1-4)p = 0.021)和AHRF再次入院(中位数0(0-1)vs 1(0-1)p = 0.016)。结论:主要转归的风险、AHRF再次入院的时间或12年内死亡 LT-NIV组的月数较小,但没有达到显著性。然而,一些次要结果分析,如AHRF的风险、AHRF发作次数和恶化都显著降低,有利于高压LT-NIV,尤其是在频繁AHRF的患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long-term non-invasive ventilation for COPD patients following an exacerbation with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure: a randomized controlled trial.

Introduction: It remains unclear whether long-term non-invasive ventilation (LT-NIV) for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) improves survival and reduces admissions as results from randomized trials are inconsistent. We aim to determine whether LT-NIV initiated after an admission with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (AHRF) can affect survival and admission rate in COPD patients.

Methods: A randomized controlled open-label trial, allocating patients with COPD to LT-NIV or standard of care immediately after an admission with AHRF treated with acute NIV. LT-NIV was aimed to normalize PaCO2 using high-pressure NIV.

Results: The study was discontinued before full sample size due to slow recruitment. 28 patients were randomized to LT-NIV and 27 patients to standard of care. 42% of patients had a history of ≥ 2 admissions with AHRF. Median IPAP was 24 cmH2O (IQR 20-28). The primary outcome, time to readmission with AHRF or death within 12 months, did not reach significance, hazard ratio 0.53 (95% CI 0.25-1.12) p = 0.097. In a competing risk analysis, adjusted for history of AHRF, the odds ratio for AHRF within 12 months was 0.30 (95% CI 0.11-0.87) p = 0.024. The LT-NIV group had less exacerbations (median 1 (0-1) vs 2 (1-4) p = 0.021) and readmissions with AHRF (median 0 (0-1) vs 1 (0-1) p = 0.016).

Conclusion: The risk of the primary outcome, time to readmission with AHRF or death within 12 months was numerically smaller in the LT-NIV group, however, did not reach significance. Nevertheless, several secondary outcome analyses like risk of AHRF, number of episodes of AHRF and exacerbations were all significantly reduced in favour of high-pressure LT-NIV, especially in patients with frequent AHRF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comorbid allergy and rhinitis and patient-related outcomes in asthma and COPD: a cross-sectional study. Lung function measurements in the Greenlandic Inuit population: results from the Greenlandic health survey 2017-2019. Asthma severity: the patient's point of view. Comparison of lung volumes measured with computed tomography and whole-body plethysmography - a systematic review. Efficacy and safety of benralizumab in elderly patients with severe eosinophilic asthma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1