缩小加拿大眼科学会之间的性别差距。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Seminars in Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-16 DOI:10.1080/08820538.2023.2253898
Mahraz Parvand, Maryam Eslami, Natalie Doughty, Sonia N Yeung, Femida Kherani
{"title":"缩小加拿大眼科学会之间的性别差距。","authors":"Mahraz Parvand, Maryam Eslami, Natalie Doughty, Sonia N Yeung, Femida Kherani","doi":"10.1080/08820538.2023.2253898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate gender distribution in Canadian ophthalmology societies' leadership and to determine associations between gender, academic productivity, and institutional rank.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified members and assessed their gender composition using publicly available updated webpages. SCOPUS database was used to gather research metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, data was collected from 12 Canadian ophthalmology societies, which included 277 executive committee members. Of these, 70.5% (196) were male and 29.1% (81) were female (<i>p</i> < .0001). Males were significantly more prevalent in presidential leadership roles (39 males vs. 23 females, <i>p</i> = .02), while females were more represented in other leadership categories (77 females vs. 61 males, <i>p</i> = .03). The Canadian Ophthalmological Society (COS) showed an upward trend in female representation from 19.2% in 2016 to 42.3% in 2021. Research productivity showed a positive correlation with society leadership rank, with a correlation coefficient of 0.732 for the m-index (<i>p</i> < .001) and 0.356 for the h-index (<i>p</i> < .05). Academic rank was also positively correlated with society leadership rank, with a correlation coefficient of 0.536 (<i>p</i> < .001). There was no significant difference in h-index (12.7 ± 1.0 for males vs. 13.8 ± 1.5 for females, <i>p</i> = .85) or number of publications (48.6 ± 5.1 for males vs. 60.0 ± 11.3 for females, <i>p</i> = .83) between male and female executive members, but females had a higher m-index (0.67 ± 0.05) compared to males (0.58 ± 0.03, <i>p</i> < .05). In academic rank, males were more likely to be associate professors (25% vs. 5% for females, <i>p</i> = .0001) or instructors (14.8% vs. 6.3% for females, <i>p</i> = .05), while a higher proportion of females held assistant professor positions (47.5% for females vs. 30.1% for males, <i>p</i> = .006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, we found that males were more prevalent in executive positions, particularly in presidential roles among Canadian ophthalmology societies. The gender distribution in leadership reflected the gender composition of practicing ophthalmologists in Canada. There was a positive correlation between research productivity and society rank, as well as academic position and society rank. Male and female executive members had similar h-index and number of publications, but females had a higher m-index. These findings highlight the need for continued efforts to address gender disparities in ophthalmology leadership.</p>","PeriodicalId":21702,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Closing the Gender Gap Among Canadian Ophthalmology Societies.\",\"authors\":\"Mahraz Parvand, Maryam Eslami, Natalie Doughty, Sonia N Yeung, Femida Kherani\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08820538.2023.2253898\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate gender distribution in Canadian ophthalmology societies' leadership and to determine associations between gender, academic productivity, and institutional rank.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified members and assessed their gender composition using publicly available updated webpages. SCOPUS database was used to gather research metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, data was collected from 12 Canadian ophthalmology societies, which included 277 executive committee members. Of these, 70.5% (196) were male and 29.1% (81) were female (<i>p</i> < .0001). Males were significantly more prevalent in presidential leadership roles (39 males vs. 23 females, <i>p</i> = .02), while females were more represented in other leadership categories (77 females vs. 61 males, <i>p</i> = .03). The Canadian Ophthalmological Society (COS) showed an upward trend in female representation from 19.2% in 2016 to 42.3% in 2021. Research productivity showed a positive correlation with society leadership rank, with a correlation coefficient of 0.732 for the m-index (<i>p</i> < .001) and 0.356 for the h-index (<i>p</i> < .05). Academic rank was also positively correlated with society leadership rank, with a correlation coefficient of 0.536 (<i>p</i> < .001). There was no significant difference in h-index (12.7 ± 1.0 for males vs. 13.8 ± 1.5 for females, <i>p</i> = .85) or number of publications (48.6 ± 5.1 for males vs. 60.0 ± 11.3 for females, <i>p</i> = .83) between male and female executive members, but females had a higher m-index (0.67 ± 0.05) compared to males (0.58 ± 0.03, <i>p</i> < .05). In academic rank, males were more likely to be associate professors (25% vs. 5% for females, <i>p</i> = .0001) or instructors (14.8% vs. 6.3% for females, <i>p</i> = .05), while a higher proportion of females held assistant professor positions (47.5% for females vs. 30.1% for males, <i>p</i> = .006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, we found that males were more prevalent in executive positions, particularly in presidential roles among Canadian ophthalmology societies. The gender distribution in leadership reflected the gender composition of practicing ophthalmologists in Canada. There was a positive correlation between research productivity and society rank, as well as academic position and society rank. Male and female executive members had similar h-index and number of publications, but females had a higher m-index. These findings highlight the need for continued efforts to address gender disparities in ophthalmology leadership.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2023.2253898\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2023.2253898","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估加拿大眼科学会领导层的性别分布,并确定性别、学术生产力和机构级别之间的关系。方法:我们使用公开更新的网页确定成员并评估他们的性别构成。SCOPUS数据库用于收集研究指标。结果:在这项研究中,数据来自12个加拿大眼科学会,其中包括277名执行委员会成员。其中,70.5%(196)为男性,29.1%(81)为女性(p p = .02),而女性在其他领导类别中的代表性更高(77名女性对61名男性,p = .03)。加拿大眼科学会(COS)显示,女性比例呈上升趋势,从2016年的19.2%上升到2021年的42.3%。研究生产力与社会领导地位呈正相关,m指数的相关系数为0.732(p p p p = .85)或出版物数量(48.6 ± 男性5.1对60.0 ± 11.3女性,p = .83),但女性的m指数较高(0.67 ± 0.05)与男性(0.58 ± 0.03,p p = .0001)或教员(14.8%对6.3%,女性,p = .05),而担任助理教授职位的女性比例更高(女性47.5%,男性30.1%,p = .006)。结论:在这项研究中,我们发现,在加拿大眼科学会中,男性在高管职位上更为普遍,尤其是在总统职位上。领导层中的性别分布反映了加拿大执业眼科医生的性别构成。研究生产力与社会等级、学术地位与社会等级呈正相关。男性和女性执行成员的h指数和出版物数量相似,但女性的m指数更高。这些发现强调了继续努力解决眼科领导层性别差异的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Closing the Gender Gap Among Canadian Ophthalmology Societies.

Objective: To evaluate gender distribution in Canadian ophthalmology societies' leadership and to determine associations between gender, academic productivity, and institutional rank.

Methods: We identified members and assessed their gender composition using publicly available updated webpages. SCOPUS database was used to gather research metrics.

Results: In this study, data was collected from 12 Canadian ophthalmology societies, which included 277 executive committee members. Of these, 70.5% (196) were male and 29.1% (81) were female (p < .0001). Males were significantly more prevalent in presidential leadership roles (39 males vs. 23 females, p = .02), while females were more represented in other leadership categories (77 females vs. 61 males, p = .03). The Canadian Ophthalmological Society (COS) showed an upward trend in female representation from 19.2% in 2016 to 42.3% in 2021. Research productivity showed a positive correlation with society leadership rank, with a correlation coefficient of 0.732 for the m-index (p < .001) and 0.356 for the h-index (p < .05). Academic rank was also positively correlated with society leadership rank, with a correlation coefficient of 0.536 (p < .001). There was no significant difference in h-index (12.7 ± 1.0 for males vs. 13.8 ± 1.5 for females, p = .85) or number of publications (48.6 ± 5.1 for males vs. 60.0 ± 11.3 for females, p = .83) between male and female executive members, but females had a higher m-index (0.67 ± 0.05) compared to males (0.58 ± 0.03, p < .05). In academic rank, males were more likely to be associate professors (25% vs. 5% for females, p = .0001) or instructors (14.8% vs. 6.3% for females, p = .05), while a higher proportion of females held assistant professor positions (47.5% for females vs. 30.1% for males, p = .006).

Conclusion: In this study, we found that males were more prevalent in executive positions, particularly in presidential roles among Canadian ophthalmology societies. The gender distribution in leadership reflected the gender composition of practicing ophthalmologists in Canada. There was a positive correlation between research productivity and society rank, as well as academic position and society rank. Male and female executive members had similar h-index and number of publications, but females had a higher m-index. These findings highlight the need for continued efforts to address gender disparities in ophthalmology leadership.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Ophthalmology
Seminars in Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Ophthalmology offers current, clinically oriented reviews on the diagnosis and treatment of ophthalmic disorders. Each issue focuses on a single topic, with a primary emphasis on appropriate surgical techniques.
期刊最新文献
Diagnosing Cataracts in the Digital Age: A Survey on AI, Metaverse, and Digital Twin Applications. Lacrimal History - Part VIII: Doyens of Dacryology Series - Lorenz Heister (1683-1758) and His Surgical Treatise. Evaluation of Early Accommodation Outcomes Following Femtosecond Laser-Assisted in situ Keratomileusis and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction. Concurrent Suprachoroidal & Vitreous Haemorrhage : A Rare Ocular Manifestation of Severe Dengue Fever. The Light Switch and the Dimmer: Qualitative Observations to Improve Diagnostic Lacrimal Irrigation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1