Rachel Hennein, Leah M Nanziri, Johnson Musinguzi, Joseph M Ggita, Patricia Turimumahoro, Emmanuel Ochom, Amanda J Gupta, Anushka Halder, Achilles Katamba, Marney A White, Robert H Pietrzak, Mari Armstrong-Hough, J Lucian Davis
{"title":"乌干达社区卫生工作者一般自我效能量表的文化适应和验证。","authors":"Rachel Hennein, Leah M Nanziri, Johnson Musinguzi, Joseph M Ggita, Patricia Turimumahoro, Emmanuel Ochom, Amanda J Gupta, Anushka Halder, Achilles Katamba, Marney A White, Robert H Pietrzak, Mari Armstrong-Hough, J Lucian Davis","doi":"10.1007/s43477-022-00064-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Self-efficacy is central to community health workers' capacity and motivation to deliver evidence-based care; thus, validated measures of self-efficacy are needed to assess the effectiveness of community health worker programs. In this study, we culturally adapted and evaluated the General Self-Efficacy Scale among community health workers in Uganda using multiple methods. We adapted the ten-item General Self-Efficacy Scale through cross-cultural discussions within our multidisciplinary research team, translation from English into Luganda and back-translation into English, and six cognitive interviews with community health workers. We administered the adapted scale in a staged, two-part cross-sectional study, including a total of 147 community health workers. Exploratory factor analysis yielded three factors, which we labeled problem-solving, persistence, and resourcefulness. This three-factor solution had good model fit (standardized root mean square residual = 0.07) and explained 53.4% of the variance. We found evidence of convergent validity, as scores for the total scale were positively correlated with years of experience (<i>r</i> = 0.48; <i>p</i> < .001) and perceived social support (<i>r</i> = 0.39, <i>p</i> < .001). Scores were also higher among those with higher educational attainment in one-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni-corrected post hoc tests [<i>F</i> (2,72) = 9.16, <i>p</i> < .001]. We also found evidence of discriminant validity, as scores for the total scale were not correlated with age (<i>r</i> = - 0.07, <i>p</i> = .55), in agreement with literature showing that general self-efficacy is an age-independent construct. The internal consistency of the adapted scale was within the acceptable range for a pilot study (Cronbach's <i>α</i> = 0.61). This evaluation of a Uganda-adapted General Self-Efficacy Scale demonstrated promising psychometric properties; however, larger studies with repeated measures are warranted to further assess the adapted scale's factor structure, validity, reliability, and stability over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":73165,"journal":{"name":"Global implementation research and applications","volume":"2 4","pages":"371-383"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10512428/pdf/nihms-1909082.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the General Self-Efficacy Scale in Ugandan Community Health Workers.\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Hennein, Leah M Nanziri, Johnson Musinguzi, Joseph M Ggita, Patricia Turimumahoro, Emmanuel Ochom, Amanda J Gupta, Anushka Halder, Achilles Katamba, Marney A White, Robert H Pietrzak, Mari Armstrong-Hough, J Lucian Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43477-022-00064-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Self-efficacy is central to community health workers' capacity and motivation to deliver evidence-based care; thus, validated measures of self-efficacy are needed to assess the effectiveness of community health worker programs. In this study, we culturally adapted and evaluated the General Self-Efficacy Scale among community health workers in Uganda using multiple methods. We adapted the ten-item General Self-Efficacy Scale through cross-cultural discussions within our multidisciplinary research team, translation from English into Luganda and back-translation into English, and six cognitive interviews with community health workers. We administered the adapted scale in a staged, two-part cross-sectional study, including a total of 147 community health workers. Exploratory factor analysis yielded three factors, which we labeled problem-solving, persistence, and resourcefulness. This three-factor solution had good model fit (standardized root mean square residual = 0.07) and explained 53.4% of the variance. We found evidence of convergent validity, as scores for the total scale were positively correlated with years of experience (<i>r</i> = 0.48; <i>p</i> < .001) and perceived social support (<i>r</i> = 0.39, <i>p</i> < .001). Scores were also higher among those with higher educational attainment in one-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni-corrected post hoc tests [<i>F</i> (2,72) = 9.16, <i>p</i> < .001]. We also found evidence of discriminant validity, as scores for the total scale were not correlated with age (<i>r</i> = - 0.07, <i>p</i> = .55), in agreement with literature showing that general self-efficacy is an age-independent construct. The internal consistency of the adapted scale was within the acceptable range for a pilot study (Cronbach's <i>α</i> = 0.61). This evaluation of a Uganda-adapted General Self-Efficacy Scale demonstrated promising psychometric properties; however, larger studies with repeated measures are warranted to further assess the adapted scale's factor structure, validity, reliability, and stability over time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global implementation research and applications\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"371-383\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10512428/pdf/nihms-1909082.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global implementation research and applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43477-022-00064-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/11/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global implementation research and applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43477-022-00064-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the General Self-Efficacy Scale in Ugandan Community Health Workers.
Self-efficacy is central to community health workers' capacity and motivation to deliver evidence-based care; thus, validated measures of self-efficacy are needed to assess the effectiveness of community health worker programs. In this study, we culturally adapted and evaluated the General Self-Efficacy Scale among community health workers in Uganda using multiple methods. We adapted the ten-item General Self-Efficacy Scale through cross-cultural discussions within our multidisciplinary research team, translation from English into Luganda and back-translation into English, and six cognitive interviews with community health workers. We administered the adapted scale in a staged, two-part cross-sectional study, including a total of 147 community health workers. Exploratory factor analysis yielded three factors, which we labeled problem-solving, persistence, and resourcefulness. This three-factor solution had good model fit (standardized root mean square residual = 0.07) and explained 53.4% of the variance. We found evidence of convergent validity, as scores for the total scale were positively correlated with years of experience (r = 0.48; p < .001) and perceived social support (r = 0.39, p < .001). Scores were also higher among those with higher educational attainment in one-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni-corrected post hoc tests [F (2,72) = 9.16, p < .001]. We also found evidence of discriminant validity, as scores for the total scale were not correlated with age (r = - 0.07, p = .55), in agreement with literature showing that general self-efficacy is an age-independent construct. The internal consistency of the adapted scale was within the acceptable range for a pilot study (Cronbach's α = 0.61). This evaluation of a Uganda-adapted General Self-Efficacy Scale demonstrated promising psychometric properties; however, larger studies with repeated measures are warranted to further assess the adapted scale's factor structure, validity, reliability, and stability over time.