乌干达社区卫生工作者一般自我效能量表的文化适应和验证。

Rachel Hennein, Leah M Nanziri, Johnson Musinguzi, Joseph M Ggita, Patricia Turimumahoro, Emmanuel Ochom, Amanda J Gupta, Anushka Halder, Achilles Katamba, Marney A White, Robert H Pietrzak, Mari Armstrong-Hough, J Lucian Davis
{"title":"乌干达社区卫生工作者一般自我效能量表的文化适应和验证。","authors":"Rachel Hennein, Leah M Nanziri, Johnson Musinguzi, Joseph M Ggita, Patricia Turimumahoro, Emmanuel Ochom, Amanda J Gupta, Anushka Halder, Achilles Katamba, Marney A White, Robert H Pietrzak, Mari Armstrong-Hough, J Lucian Davis","doi":"10.1007/s43477-022-00064-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Self-efficacy is central to community health workers' capacity and motivation to deliver evidence-based care; thus, validated measures of self-efficacy are needed to assess the effectiveness of community health worker programs. In this study, we culturally adapted and evaluated the General Self-Efficacy Scale among community health workers in Uganda using multiple methods. We adapted the ten-item General Self-Efficacy Scale through cross-cultural discussions within our multidisciplinary research team, translation from English into Luganda and back-translation into English, and six cognitive interviews with community health workers. We administered the adapted scale in a staged, two-part cross-sectional study, including a total of 147 community health workers. Exploratory factor analysis yielded three factors, which we labeled problem-solving, persistence, and resourcefulness. This three-factor solution had good model fit (standardized root mean square residual = 0.07) and explained 53.4% of the variance. We found evidence of convergent validity, as scores for the total scale were positively correlated with years of experience (<i>r</i> = 0.48; <i>p</i> < .001) and perceived social support (<i>r</i> = 0.39, <i>p</i> < .001). Scores were also higher among those with higher educational attainment in one-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni-corrected post hoc tests [<i>F</i> (2,72) = 9.16, <i>p</i> < .001]. We also found evidence of discriminant validity, as scores for the total scale were not correlated with age (<i>r</i> = - 0.07, <i>p</i> = .55), in agreement with literature showing that general self-efficacy is an age-independent construct. The internal consistency of the adapted scale was within the acceptable range for a pilot study (Cronbach's <i>α</i> = 0.61). This evaluation of a Uganda-adapted General Self-Efficacy Scale demonstrated promising psychometric properties; however, larger studies with repeated measures are warranted to further assess the adapted scale's factor structure, validity, reliability, and stability over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":73165,"journal":{"name":"Global implementation research and applications","volume":"2 4","pages":"371-383"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10512428/pdf/nihms-1909082.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the General Self-Efficacy Scale in Ugandan Community Health Workers.\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Hennein, Leah M Nanziri, Johnson Musinguzi, Joseph M Ggita, Patricia Turimumahoro, Emmanuel Ochom, Amanda J Gupta, Anushka Halder, Achilles Katamba, Marney A White, Robert H Pietrzak, Mari Armstrong-Hough, J Lucian Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43477-022-00064-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Self-efficacy is central to community health workers' capacity and motivation to deliver evidence-based care; thus, validated measures of self-efficacy are needed to assess the effectiveness of community health worker programs. In this study, we culturally adapted and evaluated the General Self-Efficacy Scale among community health workers in Uganda using multiple methods. We adapted the ten-item General Self-Efficacy Scale through cross-cultural discussions within our multidisciplinary research team, translation from English into Luganda and back-translation into English, and six cognitive interviews with community health workers. We administered the adapted scale in a staged, two-part cross-sectional study, including a total of 147 community health workers. Exploratory factor analysis yielded three factors, which we labeled problem-solving, persistence, and resourcefulness. This three-factor solution had good model fit (standardized root mean square residual = 0.07) and explained 53.4% of the variance. We found evidence of convergent validity, as scores for the total scale were positively correlated with years of experience (<i>r</i> = 0.48; <i>p</i> < .001) and perceived social support (<i>r</i> = 0.39, <i>p</i> < .001). Scores were also higher among those with higher educational attainment in one-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni-corrected post hoc tests [<i>F</i> (2,72) = 9.16, <i>p</i> < .001]. We also found evidence of discriminant validity, as scores for the total scale were not correlated with age (<i>r</i> = - 0.07, <i>p</i> = .55), in agreement with literature showing that general self-efficacy is an age-independent construct. The internal consistency of the adapted scale was within the acceptable range for a pilot study (Cronbach's <i>α</i> = 0.61). This evaluation of a Uganda-adapted General Self-Efficacy Scale demonstrated promising psychometric properties; however, larger studies with repeated measures are warranted to further assess the adapted scale's factor structure, validity, reliability, and stability over time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global implementation research and applications\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"371-383\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10512428/pdf/nihms-1909082.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global implementation research and applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43477-022-00064-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/11/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global implementation research and applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43477-022-00064-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自我效能是社区卫生工作者提供循证护理的能力和动机的核心;因此,需要有效的自我效能测量来评估社区卫生工作者计划的有效性。在这项研究中,我们使用多种方法对乌干达社区卫生工作者的一般自我效能感量表进行了文化调整和评估。我们通过多学科研究团队内的跨文化讨论、将英语翻译成卢甘达语和反译成英语,以及对社区卫生工作者的六次认知访谈,调整了十项通用自我效能感量表。我们在一项分阶段、分两部分的横断面研究中使用了适应量表,共包括147名社区卫生工作者。探索性因素分析产生了三个因素,我们将其标记为解决问题、持久性和足智多谋。该三因素解具有良好的模型拟合(标准化均方根残差=0.07),并解释了53.4%的方差。我们发现了收敛有效性的证据,因为总量表的得分与经验年限(r=0.48;p<.001)和感知社会支持(r=0.39,p<.001,由于总分与年龄无关(r=-0.07,p=.55),这与文献表明一般自我效能感是一个与年龄无关的结构一致。适应量表的内部一致性在试点研究的可接受范围内(Cronbachα=0.61)。对乌干达适应的一般自我效能量表的评估显示了良好的心理测量特性;然而,有必要通过重复测量进行更大规模的研究,以进一步评估适应量表的因子结构、有效性、可靠性和随时间的稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the General Self-Efficacy Scale in Ugandan Community Health Workers.

Self-efficacy is central to community health workers' capacity and motivation to deliver evidence-based care; thus, validated measures of self-efficacy are needed to assess the effectiveness of community health worker programs. In this study, we culturally adapted and evaluated the General Self-Efficacy Scale among community health workers in Uganda using multiple methods. We adapted the ten-item General Self-Efficacy Scale through cross-cultural discussions within our multidisciplinary research team, translation from English into Luganda and back-translation into English, and six cognitive interviews with community health workers. We administered the adapted scale in a staged, two-part cross-sectional study, including a total of 147 community health workers. Exploratory factor analysis yielded three factors, which we labeled problem-solving, persistence, and resourcefulness. This three-factor solution had good model fit (standardized root mean square residual = 0.07) and explained 53.4% of the variance. We found evidence of convergent validity, as scores for the total scale were positively correlated with years of experience (r = 0.48; p < .001) and perceived social support (r = 0.39, p < .001). Scores were also higher among those with higher educational attainment in one-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni-corrected post hoc tests [F (2,72) = 9.16, p < .001]. We also found evidence of discriminant validity, as scores for the total scale were not correlated with age (r = - 0.07, p = .55), in agreement with literature showing that general self-efficacy is an age-independent construct. The internal consistency of the adapted scale was within the acceptable range for a pilot study (Cronbach's α = 0.61). This evaluation of a Uganda-adapted General Self-Efficacy Scale demonstrated promising psychometric properties; however, larger studies with repeated measures are warranted to further assess the adapted scale's factor structure, validity, reliability, and stability over time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conceptualisation of the SHIFT–SHARE: A New Strategic Healthcare Implementation Framework for Task Shifting, Sharing and Resource Enhancement Identifying and Prioritizing Factors to Improve Implementation of an Evidence-Based Program for Child Maltreatment Prevention in Rural Missouri Communities Implementation Determinants of Problem-Solving Therapy Delivered by Near-Peer Lay Counselors for Youth Living with HIV in Botswana: Lay Counsellor Perspectives Exploring Behaviour Change of Healthcare Professionals while Implementing a Complex Nursing Intervention: A Survey Study Usability Testing of a Web Tool for Dissemination and Implementation Science Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1