本期11月

IF 4.9 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Medical Education Pub Date : 2023-10-16 DOI:10.1111/medu.15240
{"title":"本期11月","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/medu.15240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates how surgical and intensive care trainees come to understand the quality of their performance and the role of feedback conversations. Trainees reported some commonalities between specialty, but they also indicated highly divergent experiences. They had to ‘patch together’ performance information into an evolving picture of overall progress; this was particularly challenging in intensive care, which was a more ambiguous and emotional clinical context. Attending to how, when and where trainee meaning making takes place may allow for effective conversations within specialty feedback cultures.</p><p>Bearman, M, Ajjawi, R, Castanelli, D, et al Meaning making about performance: A comparison of two specialty feedback cultures. <i>Med Educ</i>. 2023;57(11):1010–1019. doi:10.1111/medu.15118</p><p>The authors confirm that interprofessional identity is a source of intrinsic motivation towards interprofessional collaboration related to wider group membership. Their study provides additional evidence for the extended professional identity theory that combines two psychological identity approaches - identity theory and social identity theory - applied to interprofessional group membership. The findings imply that interprofessional identity can affect interprofessional collaboration apart from an established team or network.</p><p>Reinders, J-J, Krijnen, W. Interprofessional identity and motivation towards interprofessional collaboration. <i>Med Educ</i>. 2023;57(11):1068–1078. doi:10.1111/medu.15096</p><p>This study explores how mentorship relationships in surgery initiate, persist, and evolve. Interviews with mentors and mentees revealed key themes: success begins with a good fit, continues through timely communication, and deepens via mutual investment and learning. Addressing tensions, balancing formality and friendship, recognising transitions, and identifying areas of contribution are essential. The study underscores that successful mentorship is dynamic, demanding active engagement and shared responsibility from both mentors and mentees. Co-regulation and mutual investment play crucial roles in nurturing growth and learning within these relationships.</p><p>Louridas M, Enani GN, Brydges R, MacRae HM. Exploring Mentorship in Surgery: An Interview Study on How People Stick Together. <i>Med Educ</i>. 2023;57(11):1028-1035. doi:10.1111/medu.15157</p><p>This study examines how physicians address social determinants of health that are beyond their control, aiming to improve trainee preparedness. ‘Helplessness’ stories reveal emotional distress when unable to support patients, while ‘Shortcoming’ and ‘Transformation’ narratives show how realisations about shortcomings lead to personal transformation. ‘Doctor-patient relationship’ stories emphasise its importance, and ‘System advocacy’ stories stress the need for advocacy to change broken systems. The study suggests that current approaches focusing solely on altering social circumstances may lead to distress and burnout, advocating for alternative coping strategies such as self-improvement, patient connection, and advocacy efforts.</p><p>Peebles ER, Pack R, Goldszmidt M. From Helplessness to Transformation: An Analysis of Clinician Narratives about the Social Determinants of Health and their Implications for Training and Practice. <i>Med Educ.</i> 2023;57(11):1054-1067. doi:10.1111/medu.15184</p>","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":"57 11","pages":"993"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/medu.15240","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"November in this issue\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/medu.15240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study investigates how surgical and intensive care trainees come to understand the quality of their performance and the role of feedback conversations. Trainees reported some commonalities between specialty, but they also indicated highly divergent experiences. They had to ‘patch together’ performance information into an evolving picture of overall progress; this was particularly challenging in intensive care, which was a more ambiguous and emotional clinical context. Attending to how, when and where trainee meaning making takes place may allow for effective conversations within specialty feedback cultures.</p><p>Bearman, M, Ajjawi, R, Castanelli, D, et al Meaning making about performance: A comparison of two specialty feedback cultures. <i>Med Educ</i>. 2023;57(11):1010–1019. doi:10.1111/medu.15118</p><p>The authors confirm that interprofessional identity is a source of intrinsic motivation towards interprofessional collaboration related to wider group membership. Their study provides additional evidence for the extended professional identity theory that combines two psychological identity approaches - identity theory and social identity theory - applied to interprofessional group membership. The findings imply that interprofessional identity can affect interprofessional collaboration apart from an established team or network.</p><p>Reinders, J-J, Krijnen, W. Interprofessional identity and motivation towards interprofessional collaboration. <i>Med Educ</i>. 2023;57(11):1068–1078. doi:10.1111/medu.15096</p><p>This study explores how mentorship relationships in surgery initiate, persist, and evolve. Interviews with mentors and mentees revealed key themes: success begins with a good fit, continues through timely communication, and deepens via mutual investment and learning. Addressing tensions, balancing formality and friendship, recognising transitions, and identifying areas of contribution are essential. The study underscores that successful mentorship is dynamic, demanding active engagement and shared responsibility from both mentors and mentees. Co-regulation and mutual investment play crucial roles in nurturing growth and learning within these relationships.</p><p>Louridas M, Enani GN, Brydges R, MacRae HM. Exploring Mentorship in Surgery: An Interview Study on How People Stick Together. <i>Med Educ</i>. 2023;57(11):1028-1035. doi:10.1111/medu.15157</p><p>This study examines how physicians address social determinants of health that are beyond their control, aiming to improve trainee preparedness. ‘Helplessness’ stories reveal emotional distress when unable to support patients, while ‘Shortcoming’ and ‘Transformation’ narratives show how realisations about shortcomings lead to personal transformation. ‘Doctor-patient relationship’ stories emphasise its importance, and ‘System advocacy’ stories stress the need for advocacy to change broken systems. The study suggests that current approaches focusing solely on altering social circumstances may lead to distress and burnout, advocating for alternative coping strategies such as self-improvement, patient connection, and advocacy efforts.</p><p>Peebles ER, Pack R, Goldszmidt M. From Helplessness to Transformation: An Analysis of Clinician Narratives about the Social Determinants of Health and their Implications for Training and Practice. <i>Med Educ.</i> 2023;57(11):1054-1067. doi:10.1111/medu.15184</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"57 11\",\"pages\":\"993\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/medu.15240\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/medu.15240\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/medu.15240","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了外科和重症监护培训生如何理解他们的表现质量和反馈对话的作用。学员们报告了不同专业之间的一些共性,但他们也表示了高度不同的经历。他们必须将业绩信息“拼凑”成整体进展的不断变化的图景;这在重症监护中尤其具有挑战性,因为重症监护是一个更加模糊和情绪化的临床环境。关注培训生如何、何时、何地进行意义生成,可以在专业反馈文化中进行有效的对话。Bearman, M, Ajjawi, R, Castanelli, D,等。绩效意义建构:两种专业反馈文化的比较。中华医学杂志,2009;37(11):1010-1019。doi: 10.1111 / medu。15118 .作者证实,跨专业认同是与更广泛的群体成员关系相关的跨专业合作的内在动机来源。他们的研究为扩展职业认同理论提供了额外的证据,该理论结合了两种心理认同理论-认同理论和社会认同理论-适用于跨专业群体成员。研究结果表明,跨专业认同可以影响跨专业合作,而不是建立团队或网络。李建军,李建军。跨专业认同与跨专业合作动机。中华医学杂志,2009;37(11):1068-1078。doi: 10.1111 / medu。[15096]本研究探讨外科中师徒关系如何开始、持续和发展。对导师和学员的采访揭示了关键主题:成功始于良好的契合,持续于及时的沟通,并通过相互投资和学习而加深。处理紧张关系,平衡形式和友谊,认识到过渡,并确定贡献领域是必不可少的。该研究强调,成功的师徒关系是动态的,需要导师和学员双方的积极参与和共同承担责任。共同监管和相互投资在促进这些关系中的成长和学习方面发挥着至关重要的作用。Louridas M, Enani GN, bridges R, MacRae HM。探索外科指导:一项关于人们如何团结在一起的访谈研究。中华医学杂志,2009;37(11):1028-1035。doi: 10.1111 / medu。15157 .本研究探讨了医生如何处理他们无法控制的健康社会决定因素,旨在提高见习生的准备程度。“无助”的故事揭示了当无法支持病人时的情绪困扰,而“缺点”和“转变”的故事展示了对缺点的认识如何导致个人转变。“医患关系”的故事强调它的重要性,而“系统倡导”的故事强调需要倡导改变破碎的系统。该研究表明,目前的方法只关注改变社会环境可能会导致痛苦和倦怠,提倡其他应对策略,如自我完善、与患者联系和倡导努力。Peebles ER, Pack R, Goldszmidt M.从无助到转变:临床医生关于健康的社会决定因素及其对培训和实践的影响的分析。中华医学杂志,2009;37(11):1054-1067。doi: 10.1111 / medu.15184
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
November in this issue

This study investigates how surgical and intensive care trainees come to understand the quality of their performance and the role of feedback conversations. Trainees reported some commonalities between specialty, but they also indicated highly divergent experiences. They had to ‘patch together’ performance information into an evolving picture of overall progress; this was particularly challenging in intensive care, which was a more ambiguous and emotional clinical context. Attending to how, when and where trainee meaning making takes place may allow for effective conversations within specialty feedback cultures.

Bearman, M, Ajjawi, R, Castanelli, D, et al Meaning making about performance: A comparison of two specialty feedback cultures. Med Educ. 2023;57(11):1010–1019. doi:10.1111/medu.15118

The authors confirm that interprofessional identity is a source of intrinsic motivation towards interprofessional collaboration related to wider group membership. Their study provides additional evidence for the extended professional identity theory that combines two psychological identity approaches - identity theory and social identity theory - applied to interprofessional group membership. The findings imply that interprofessional identity can affect interprofessional collaboration apart from an established team or network.

Reinders, J-J, Krijnen, W. Interprofessional identity and motivation towards interprofessional collaboration. Med Educ. 2023;57(11):1068–1078. doi:10.1111/medu.15096

This study explores how mentorship relationships in surgery initiate, persist, and evolve. Interviews with mentors and mentees revealed key themes: success begins with a good fit, continues through timely communication, and deepens via mutual investment and learning. Addressing tensions, balancing formality and friendship, recognising transitions, and identifying areas of contribution are essential. The study underscores that successful mentorship is dynamic, demanding active engagement and shared responsibility from both mentors and mentees. Co-regulation and mutual investment play crucial roles in nurturing growth and learning within these relationships.

Louridas M, Enani GN, Brydges R, MacRae HM. Exploring Mentorship in Surgery: An Interview Study on How People Stick Together. Med Educ. 2023;57(11):1028-1035. doi:10.1111/medu.15157

This study examines how physicians address social determinants of health that are beyond their control, aiming to improve trainee preparedness. ‘Helplessness’ stories reveal emotional distress when unable to support patients, while ‘Shortcoming’ and ‘Transformation’ narratives show how realisations about shortcomings lead to personal transformation. ‘Doctor-patient relationship’ stories emphasise its importance, and ‘System advocacy’ stories stress the need for advocacy to change broken systems. The study suggests that current approaches focusing solely on altering social circumstances may lead to distress and burnout, advocating for alternative coping strategies such as self-improvement, patient connection, and advocacy efforts.

Peebles ER, Pack R, Goldszmidt M. From Helplessness to Transformation: An Analysis of Clinician Narratives about the Social Determinants of Health and their Implications for Training and Practice. Med Educ. 2023;57(11):1054-1067. doi:10.1111/medu.15184

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Education
Medical Education 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
279
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education seeks to be the pre-eminent journal in the field of education for health care professionals, and publishes material of the highest quality, reflecting world wide or provocative issues and perspectives. The journal welcomes high quality papers on all aspects of health professional education including; -undergraduate education -postgraduate training -continuing professional development -interprofessional education
期刊最新文献
The need for critical and intersectional approaches to equity efforts in postgraduate medical education: A critical narrative review. When I say … neurodiversity paradigm. The transition to clerkshIps bootcamp: Innovative and flexible curriculum strategies post COVID-19 adaptation. Issue Information Empowering dental students' collaborative learning using peer assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1